this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
2259 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

5801 readers
2441 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 148 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

It didn't end that quick, but he stopped after 9 months due to health concerns. The goal was to earn $1 million in a year, he had earned $62k.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 124 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

And IIRC, he only did so through siphoning off the value of free facebook/craigslist furniture.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13332399/Millionaire-Mike-Black-homeless-broke-purpose-ends-bizarre-social-experiment.html

It sucks that the only reporting on this is shitty tabloids.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 124 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Don't forget he accepted charity in the form of free housing and donations that were likely only available to him through existing connections.

Also this:

Despite failing to make the million dollars he had aimed for, Black says it was still a successful experiment after demonstrating how it was possible to rebuild his life through the power of determination.

So this dipshit learned nothing. He failed, and would probably have died in the gutter, but instead he pulled the ripcord and bailed on poverty in a way that isn't available to 99% of humans on earth.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 76 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

He had knowledge and connections to the upper echelons and he couldn't make it, and when health concerns arose he went back to his money because it sucks to be working poor and in need of medical assistance.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 5 months ago (4 children)

He also didn’t have the stress that would come from actual failure with no money.

Bankruptcy, homelessness and real poverty fuck up your ability to succeed in a vastly underrated way.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. The calculus for taking risks is vastly different when there's a safety net. You can treat it as a game and go all in.

On the other hand if there's even a small chance of losing housing or getting in legal trouble or your family being destitute you take no risks - if you are a person with a sense of responsibility that is.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yup, or you take maybe a couple risks in a lifetime, but if they don't pan out you suffer from them for years as you go back to stability and try to regain what little of a toehold on a good life you might have had.

The very real lesson for the poor is "don't try," especially if you have dependents. You'll be knocked back harder than you can imagine.

These mfs don't know what it's like to see loved ones start losing teeth because you made a failed push and now you're paying it back with interest.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

You can see how this structure favours the most sociopathic members of society, as they are the ones that will take more risks without regard for others.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

His father got cancer during the experiment. He considered ending it then, but he continued with the experiment.

Imagine having that sort of choice. He didn't have to skip work to take his dad to appointments. He didn't have to eat ramen to afford chemo. It was only when his own health was at risk that he pulled the plug.

Imagine a world where everybody had that sort of safety net. Just like, "Nope, shit's too hard."

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For most people, it's easier to become homeless than it is for the homeless to extricate themselves from it.

[–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Even the stress of worrying about money. Yeah you can take out a loan for your risky business venture when you know you won't have to worry about paying it back. Yeah, you can couch surf for a while when you aren't staring down the next few decades of your life.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 months ago

Right, those 62k he did earn would have been gone and him probably homeless as soon as his health issues got worse. It's a reality for a lot of Americans. Also those 62k he earned were thanks to all the education and experience he was able to get thanks to his privilege. Most people aren't fortunate enough to have his level of education and experience to help them even get to 62k. I make 25 percent less than that and still feel fortunate of where I got to since I came from absolutely nothing.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 40 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yea, he flipped free furniture off of Facebook. Only a rich asshole would come up with an idea like that

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago

"If I can be a parasite, you can too*"

* just ignore that I didn't again become a millionaire like I said I would. And just ignore all the experience and schooling I started with that others don't.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 109 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

This video was such absolute bull crap lol. He randomly found some dude on like his SECOND night homeless that let him stay in a spare room for free.

Then he flipped free stuff on Craigslist and Facebook for cash which is... fine I guess. A little sleazy but whatever. Magically found transportation and the ability to store and haul this stuff all over town but never explained any of that.

Then he majestically found someone to cosign and provide initial payments to rent like a four bedroom house that he sublet to 3 other tenants... So he found some random guy to COSIGN for him which is crazy knowing how much liability that puts on you while ALSO finding a landlord that is allowing a guy with no job, no income, no credit, no prior residences, and no money to not only rent from him with a random co signer but also allowing him to sublet to three other random ass people the landlord will never even meet. This is possible... But EXTREMELY unlikely. Also, the fact that this dude tries to do a homeless challenge by immediately becoming a landlord is pretty funny ngl. Also it's worth noting that his final number ($64k or whatever) was revenue not profit. He said himself he was making about 50% profit so he made closer to around $30k on the year.

And on top of all that, the fact that he cites health issues as this unforeseen unfortunate issue that got in the way of his inevitable success is kinda rich. That's... kinda the deal with poverty. You fall on hard times. Health often falls apart. Unexpected expenses destroy you. It can and often does completely tear your world apart. Thems the breaks man lol. Dude just experienced life a little and quit.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It sounds like he wasn't using his money directly but might have used his ability to access his money to build "credit" with others.

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Used his existing social credit too. All his random business successes during those 9 months were from "I know a guy that might want in on this" kind of crap.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or scammed someone really hard which is worse.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I mean, it's possible but unless he specifically said that he wouldn't use his identity during the experiment, just proving who he was would be enough to trivialize the risk of even a significant loan for most people. A lender would know that whatever happens, either they'll get paid back by him from within the experiment or he'll pay them back as the billionaire after the experiment, maybe even rounding up to the next significant digit or something crazy like that (but still trivial for him).

Also, "I was doing an experiment" isn't a defense against fraud. Though him being a billionaire probably means that the only penalty would be paying back the victim with maybe a little extra plus legal fees or hush money.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

Nitpicking, but that's also not like a sustainable way to conduct oneself in a society. Like his only "service" was inserting himself as an unnecessary middleman.

If everyone did that you'd have nothing but grifters making money moves on eachother, and nothing would ever get actually made. Basically, it's not the kind of work which produces new value through labour.

Which maybe if the point idk, I'm not a total parasite

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Ah, so despite having tons of advantages, they were able to find themselves right smack dab at an average income. Nice.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I could be wrong but isn't that more than most people make in 12 months?

So it might not be possible to make millions, but for someone who has the loose ethics of millionaires it's still possible to make significant money starting from scratch. The issue being the unethical/exploitative behavior needed to get there.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He didn't really start from scratch, though. He used connections and training he had from before he embarked on this "experiment".

[–] Blum0108@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (3 children)

That, and getting free stuff online and selling it for profit is kind of shitty.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

That's what I mean by loose ethics and exploitation.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Eh, that's a common hustle among people who need money.

[–] Blum0108@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not really something to be held up as an example of success. Not everyone can do that, or it wouldn't work. Plus there are people who could use that free stuff that he's essentially stealing from. Just goes to show that this guy has no ethics.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Honestly, I would argue at least a portion of those items would get thrown away if he hadn't gotten them. When someone wants something gone, and when a different person wants to acquire that particular thing don't always align. It's tweaker arbitrage, but it's not that big a deal IMHO.

The real moral failing from my perspective is not recognizing how much help he got, and how 'lucky' he was.

[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

But the kind of thing rich people do. Also, why does lemmy say that you answered @Zorque@lemmy.world before they even wrote their comment?

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Sure, without any debt plus free housing and donations from folks you already know.

[–] MacNCheezus -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In the middle of a pandemic, no less.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Using a free car that "magically" fell into his lap, whats more.