149

The president often had a weak, raspy voice during his first debate against Trump, in what Democrats had hoped would be a turning point in the race.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 114 points 4 days ago

I'm not in a panic. I knew this. Should he have run again? Hell no. I wish he would have had the courage to call it a day.

That being said, I'm fully willing to endure 4 years of Weekend at Bernie's if it means I won't have to go through the embarrassment of having the orange moron at the helm.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 4 days ago

Now I'm sad because I remember wishing Bernie had won.

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

You and me both, man. He was my guy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

But it was Hilary's turn! /s

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Now I’m sad because I remember wishing Bernie had won.

We all are dude. Or so I am guessing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Are you willing to let Trump win though than have Biden step aside? That is what the DNC should be asking themselves. The polls are way to close for Biden to have that poor of a performance. If Democrats are seriously worried about Trump being the end of Democracy then they would not be okay with Biden being the DNC's best choice.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago

I think it's to late to change things up. That's the problem, everyone told the DNC this was going to happen and yet they all just kept with Biden.

That being said, I don't think either Trump or Biden are in a state to actually run the country. Their cabinets are going to hold all the power, and I trust Bidens cabinet over Trumps any day.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 days ago

Any change no matter if is too late or too inconvenient would be a better change for the DNC than to allow Biden at the top position. Seriously, any other DNC politician would be better than Biden even if they changed right now or in the next few months. All you need is some politician who is about 50 years old to fight Trump every day until the election and the orange menace would suffer a heart attack trying to keep up.

This is insane .... it's almost as if the powers that be want Trump to win and the only way they can ensure that is to put him up against an 80 year old competitor because it is the only candidate he could possibly beat.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

I agree. I'll vote for Biden if I have to, but if Trump wins I'm not blaming RFK Jr like they blamed Bernie and Jill Stein in 2016. I'll blame them and likely never vote for a majority political party again.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

and likely never vote for a majority political party again.

If Trump wins you will never get to vote in a free and fair election ever again.

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Which will be the fault of Democrats.

[-] BReel@lemmy.one 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This line of thought always amuses me. “It’s democrats faults for not stopping republicans from being horrible people”

Oooooorrrrr maybe it’s republicans fault… for being horrible people?

“It’s the fire departments fault my house burned down, not the guy who lit it on fire.”

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

That’s the problem, everyone told the DNC this was going to happen and yet they all just kept with Biden.

i think that's only the tip of the iceberg; we're going to vote for them anyways so they literally have no reason to bother listening, ever.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago

That's the real danger of Donny. If you care at all about the country you have to vote for the Democrat. It gives the Dems too much power.

If this strategy allows them to win elections while putting forth the most donor friendly and least citizen friendly candidate, they're not going to stop on their own. Go vote Biden sure but in 4 year if you don't have a plan to ensure the next Dem candidate isn't the least liked person whos technically better than a Republican then you're responsible for the regression of the country.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

At the end of the day, that's the main takeaway here. It's not so much the men themselves, but the people they intend to appoint to positions of authority. Biden will appoint experts and professionals to run the country for him. Trump will appoint sycophants and yes-men to do whatever he wants to do, even if it flies in the face of reason or standard procedure, and unlike last time he won't allow anyone who isn't 100% loyal to him to work in his administration.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

While I agree, it's way too late in the game to change up now. There's no strong candidate waiting in the wings. It's not about willing, it's about alternatives.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Gretchen Whitmer would run away with the election. Plus, we get Michigan (swing state) and the suburban moms. I really can’t see a downside.

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

There are so many better options at this point. I can't help but shake that the two party system is doing exactly what it was designed to do. Make people think that mediocrity is the best we can get if we're lucky.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

There doesn't have to be a strong candidate, just anyone stronger than Biden who's basically zombie-crawling across the floor.

He absolutely can be replaced at this stage, and by nearly anyone.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

AOC would be a really strong candidate. The right would freak out and she'd end up getting more press coverage than Trump. I imagine she'd make several Republican's embolisms pop.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

The party would rather lose democracy forever than nominate AOC.

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Yes, she's probably the only one with enough name recognition and veracity to take on the orange moron in my opinion. Problem is corporate Democrats wouldn't back her because she's too progressive and that goes against their corporate masters.

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

True... However if Trump gets elected and our government is able to prevent a dictatorship, in 4 years progressives will hopefully realize the DNC needs them more than they need need the DNC.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

We'll need to see the polling in about a week but I haven't seen a performance this bad since Palin. The Democrats may need to go to an open convention.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 days ago

I’m fully willing to endure 4 years of Weekend at Bernie’s if it means I won’t have to go through the embarrassment of having the orange moron at the helm.

DEAR PLEASE GOD someone turn this into comedic satire before the election!!!

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I would. You would. But there are millions of voters who aren’t as informed. And what they saw last night was an ancient, out of touch candidate channeling Walter Mondale. Many will probably still vote for him, but this performance will depress voter turnout.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
149 points (76.1% liked)

politics

18062 readers
5130 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS