In England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of the landed proprietors would be insecure. An agrarian law would soon take place. If these observations be just, our government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation. Landholders ought to have a share in the government, to support these invaluable interests and to balance and check the other. They ought to be so constituted as to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority. The senate, therefore, ought to be this body; and to answer these purposes, they ought to have permanency and stability.

—James Madison

[–] allthetimesivedied@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shocker there what “tyranny of the majority” actually meant.

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, it makes much more sense when taken in the context of them all being wealthy landowners, many of whom owned slaves