300
submitted 9 months ago by deconstruct@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

One of three active-duty Marines who stormed the U.S. Capitol together was sentenced on Monday to probation and 279 hours of community service — one hour for every Marine who was killed or wounded fighting in the Civil War.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes said she can’t fathom why Dodge Hellonen violated his oath to protect the Constitution “against all enemies, foreign and domestic” — and risked his career — by joining the Jan. 6, 2021, riot that disrupted Congress from certifying President Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory.

“I really urge you to think about why it happened so you can address it and ensure it never happens again,” Reyes said.

Dodge Hellonen, now 24, was the first of the three Marines to be punished for participating in the Capitol siege. Reyes also is scheduled to sentence co-defendants Micah Coomer on Tuesday and Joshua Abate on Wednesday.

The three Marines — friends from the same unit — drove together from a military post in Virginia to Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, when then-President Donald Trump spoke at his “Stop the Steal” rally near the White House. They joined the crowd that stormed the Capitol after Trump urged his supporters to “fight like hell.”

Before imposing Hellonen’s sentence, Reyes described how Marines fought and died in some of the fiercest battles in American history. She recited the number of casualties from some of the bloodiest wars.

After walking to the Rotunda, they placed a red “Make America Great Again” hat on a statute and took photos of it. They remained inside the Capitol for nearly an hour, joining other rioters in chanting “Stop the Steal!” and “Four More Years!”

None of them are accused of engaging in any violence or destruction on Jan. 6. But prosecutors said none of them have expressed sincere remorse for their crimes.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 145 points 9 months ago

All three Marines are expected to be discharged on "Other than Honorable" conditions which means they receive no benefits. They do not qualify for Veteran status either. They will be treated the same as a Felon on job interviews and for loans.

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 43 points 9 months ago

Their punishment is just 35 days of unpaid labor, plus the threat of poverty, discrimination and incarceration?

For millions of average Americans, that's just a regular day, and they didn't participate on the front lines of a coup.

That is fucking messed up

[-] grue@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They deserve "dishonorable" and a prolonged visit to Leavenworth. They are traitors who violated their military oaths by participating in a fucking insurrection, for crying out loud!

[-] Backspacecentury@kbin.social 30 points 9 months ago

Finally, some good news.

[-] devil_d0c@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

OTH doesn't show up on a regular background check, and you are not required to disclose it. Not sure about bad conduct or dishonorable discharges, though.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

They aren't getting a court martial? damn

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[-] czarrie@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

No, they can still get some, look up "Honorable for VA Purposes".

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

They won't, that's for those with combat injuries.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 92 points 9 months ago

279 days would be considered a joke of a sentence, let alone 279 hours!

This is absolutely infuriating. Their punishment should be more severe being that they were military, not lighter.

We are literally asking these traitors to try this again what with these pathetic punishments.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

I could see some PUBLIC community service being layered on TOP of a long stretch in the clink, so that people get to see these people, and know who they are.

But only community service for these terrorists? WTAF.

[-] NixDev@programming.dev 13 points 9 months ago

I agree that this is way too light. Hopefully the rest of the active duty Marines makes their lives a living hell.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 87 points 9 months ago

None of them are accused of engaging in any violence or destruction on Jan. 6. But prosecutors said none of them have expressed sincere remorse for their crimes.

And none of them will if judges hand out flimsy sentences like community service for participating in an attempted insurrection.

I assume court martials are also up and coming for these three and hopefully there the proverbial book will be thrown at them. Hard.

[-] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago

Traitorous, every one of them. They should be given a dishonorable discharge, barred from reenlistment, and forfeiture of all VA benefits.

They have taken it up on themselves to disgrace what it represents to be a defender of this nation and its ideals. The oath they took was nothing more than words to them. I am very disappointed in my military brothers and hope they can find a better path going forward.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

UCMJ can still have its say.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Already happening. From the article:

As of Friday, all three Marines were still on active-duty status, according to the Marine Corps. But all three could be separated from the Marine Corps “on less than honorable conditions,” prosecutors said.

Hellonen received separation paperwork in July, while Coomer awaited a decision last Friday on his possible separation, according to prosecutors. They said Abate was still enlisted in the Marine Corps as of Sept. 1

[-] III@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

They said "throw the book at 'em". Sadly, the book was the 3-page leaflet detailing conduct becoming of a marine, apparently.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago

That's a bullshit sentence. He needs to be in prison!

[-] TheaoneAndOnly27@kbin.social 17 points 9 months ago

I still hold that if you entered the capital on January 6th, it's treason and should be given the punishment for treason. All of them.

[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

There's something poetically appropriate about 279 hours, and this isn't a poetic moment. It a moment where a serious judge would call this treason, or sedition and sentence the convicted person as such. SMH Every single one of them, those that entered the capitol, those that planned for the attack and then let others carry it out, and those that have supported them all along in elected offices in congress and elsewhere should all be treated appropriately.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago
[-] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

No, literally treason. Attacking the Capitol is levying war, and supporting Trump is giving aid and comfort to an enemy (as Trump made himself an enemy of the United States by attempting to overthrow it).

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago

It honestly should have been 279 days in the brig, with a brief written essay on every single one of those civil war marines.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 19 points 9 months ago

They are likely going to get it from the military side as well. No double jeopardy protection exists between military/civilain courts.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

Yeah, the USMC needs to throw the book at this chucklefuck.

[-] TheOtherThyme@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

All he got was a demotion.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, he got temporarily reassigned to a shit detail and served his Other than honorable or dishonorable discharge papers. OTH can refer to either, so its not clear which. The other two likely have the same papers coming. Its near the end of the article.

Either discharge would prevent them from accessing any military benefits like the VA home loan/GI bill/VA healthcare/etc.

They would also not be eligible for security clearances/government work/etc. If they were in SIGINT like the article implies, they just lost all of the lucrative defense and government jobs for that rating. Say goodbye to 6 figure cybersecurity jobs in the civilan world too.

They fucked their lives up big.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

Wait, aside from this case, OTH disqualifies you from the VA? That’s… fucked up given the cycle of PTSD, substance abuse, and lashing out that can be caused by military service and can easily lead to an OTH discharge.

I don’t know why I’m surprised anymore.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 9 months ago

He's been fired right or at least on permanent desk duty. Tell me this idiot isn't a marine anymore.

Why isn't he in prison, not only he did he break the law and try and overthrow the legitimate government of the United States but he did so while being military personnel.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes said she can’t fathom why Dodge Hellonen violated his oath to protect the Constitution “against all enemies, foreign and domestic” — and risked his career — by joining the Jan. 6, 2021, riot that disrupted Congress from certifying President Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory.

The three Marines — friends from the same unit — drove together from a military post in Virginia to Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, when then-President Donald Trump spoke at his “Stop the Steal” rally near the White House.

Reyes said it “carried a great deal of weight” to learn that Hellonen maintained a positive attitude and stellar work ethic when he was effectively demoted after the Jan. 6 attack.

Hellonen, Coomer and Abate pleaded guilty earlier this year to parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building, a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum of six months behind bars.

Coomer bragged on social media about taking part in “history,” called for a “fresh start” and said he was “waiting for the boogaloo,” a slang term for a second civil war in the U.S.

He worked at the Marine Corps Information Operations Center as a signals intelligence analyst and was promoted to the rank of sergeant in August 2021, said his attorney, Halerie Costello.


The original article contains 902 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

If he was working in signals analysis he was likely cleared at the secret or top secret levels and could have very easily leveraged his experience into a super lucrative job in intelligence work or communications after his military service. This sentence and the discharge from service has probably eliminated the chances of that.

[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Insufficient. He should be in the slammer until his grandkids are old enough to be ashamed; if not executed

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

All three need to be blanket partied 279 times.

[-] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Military courts will fuck these guys up.

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
300 points (98.1% liked)

politics

18059 readers
3089 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS