this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
681 points (98.0% liked)

Memes

8016 readers
675 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 109 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are pixels like super valuable that far into the future?

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It takes a lot of energy to send them back in time

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Verison charges an arm and a leg to time-bandwidth

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It probably won't be that long before some organism evolves the ability to digest plastic.

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 69 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Already exists, actually. Just not widespread yet

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Cool, didn't know that. Now just hope they don't make us sick or we're really screwed. With all the microplastics in our bodies they're going to be everywhere.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The waste is toxic. Because the input is toxic, but locked into relatively stable polymers, until something breaks it down.

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Toxicity isn't as simple as "toxic = toxic + toxic." While some byproducts of plastic breakdown are toxic, the bacteria are further dissolving those as well, going until they get glucose, as they wouldn't be able to eat it if that wasn't the end product. There are probably still some toxic byproducts that get excreted rather than broken down, but plastic breakdown already releases toxins under normal conditions, so that's already a problem we're going to have to tackle. If these bacteria can get past the first issue of breaking it down in the first place, then that's a net positive.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, if “toxic + toxic = toxic” made sense then table salt would be extremely dangerous.

Sodium = extremely volatile and usually explosive metal when interacting with water (more than half of what makes us)

Chlorine = gas at room temperature that can kill you in minutes at concentrations of 1000ppm or more

Sodium + Chlorine = Sodium Chloride = delicious table salt that makes food yummy and helps power our neurons

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thinking about it, we work on a whole bunch of highly volatile chemicals bound to a bit less volatile ones for stability.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago

We’re biochemical foundries. It’s pretty damn cool.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's a part of a potential solution, but right now if you dump a bunch of plastivores in a trash pit instead of a bunch of plastic in a hole that won't break down from a thousand years you get a toxic slurry capable of entering groundwater supplies.

Of course, micro plastics are also doing that, so pick your poison I suppose.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 months ago
[–] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Y'all aren't crabbing-out yet?

[–] meleethecat@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Long days and pleasant nights

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's enough time for us to evolve into carbon dioxide plastic eating beings, isn't it?

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago

For something completely new like that 50k years is not all that much.

Perhaps enough time for the existing plastic eating bacteria to spread across the world, tho a lot of plastics are buried deep in soil already, so artefacts might survive. Same as with wood, before the wood/cellulose eating bacteria got all over the place, dead trees just for buried. So at high pressure plastic might turn once again into oil.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] SlothMama@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

First artifical pop idol some 15 years ago.

[–] AscendantSquid@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago
[–] fin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

My innate otaku sensor says it isn't.

Cirno

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Weebs are eternal

[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It would probably just be microplastics by then?

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

Those crabs will probably just be microplastic by then, at least if our trajectory as a species has anything to say about it.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Always has been.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think 50k years is a bit too short for major evolution to happen*. And 5 million years too long for plastic figures.

* We needed about 100k to adapt our body hair to clothes.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

curious what reference they use for year 0.
any theories?

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Such a stupid system. AD and BC are the same amount of letters. CE and BCE don't line up when written. Drives me crazy!

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

And they could've just said "BC" stands for "before the common era." Fuck it, why not? And make up some other meaning for AD, so we can just hand-wave a non-problem.

This is the date system we use. We're not switching. It's rooted in a religiously-venerated dead guy. Get over it. It's not even accurate to that specific guy. They already fudged it all over the place a thousand years ago.

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

I believe it's used in the scientific community to avoid the religion. I'm not sure in what way it needs to line up when written.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Why would crabs use the same reference dates as humans

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I just assumed since the crab was speaking English

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

oh that's funny because i assumed it was speaking crab language