this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
310 points (93.8% liked)

Frugal

5697 readers
1 users here now

Discuss how to save money.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want this chart, but add the third Z axis of "environmental cost" whether it be just CO2 emissions or a "total" impact score.

I imagine those legumes get even stronger, while the meats lose ranking.

[–] Mountain_Mike_420@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] tar@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

this is such a great resource to understand why footprints are ridiculous metrics and how interconnected our industrial agriculture systems are.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] tar@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why does cottonseed, which would otherwise go to waste, get counted against cattle, when that is a conservative of resources?

according to this, cattle mostly graze or are fed things that otherwise would be wasted.

[–] 1800doctorb@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

I like this scatter plot. If you really want to get freaky with it, you should take into account the “protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores.” Things like eggs and whey are 100%, beans are usually in the high 70’s, and peanuts are actually down at near 50%.

So for nutrition’s sake, not all protein sources are created equal, and it makes sense that if you are trying to get adequate protein at the lowest price, you also want to get sources where you can eat the least of it to satisfy the protein requirements of your body.

[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Curious where tofu would be at on this chart.

[–] Bolt@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Probably somewhere around the legume cluster. They're really pulling their weight there, as expected, though peanuts are quite the dark horse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OlPatchy2Eyes@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Great post!

I wanted to add that this isn't quite how proteins work. Those protein-rich legumes aren't what you would call 'complete proteins.' There's a number of amino acids our bodies use as proteins and while legumes are a good source of many of them, there's a couple proteins you won't get enough of from just the beans. Fortunately, brown rice- while not as rich in protein- gives you the proteins that the beans are lacking. That's why beans and rice are a match made in heaven.

Herbivorous animals are just better at metabolising proteins from plants and of course they're capable of eating much more than us. That's why they're able to live off of grass.

This just stuff I read up on a few years ago so if I've gotten something wrong please say so

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's extremely unlikely that anyone with an even vaguely normal diet isn't getting all the essential amino acids as those complementary to legumes are found not just in rice but in all grains and seeds. So it's not just rice, any kind of bread, pasta, oats, barley/spelt/etc. or nuts will do. And soy is pretty much a complete protein.

[–] OlPatchy2Eyes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yours and other comments have been insightful and have made me reconsider some assumptions I did not realize I had made, so thank you.

I'll concede that a sedentary person of normal weight doesn't need to worry much about getting all their essential amino acids. If I was interested in gaining muscle on a plant-based diet, would you say that I would still be wasting energy by stressing about eating all the proteins? Wouldn't that make my only issue getting the right amount of calories?

I'll look for some literature when I have the time but if you have any off-hand knowledge you could share then I would appreciate it.

[–] boomzilla@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's very much possible. Look up Noah Hannibal, Nimai Delgado, John Thomas, Brian Turner, Lifting Vegan Logic, Lakshay Naidu, Patrik Baboumian.

They all eat Tofu and other soy products like edamame regularily, often for decades and can't exactly be called feminized.

So tofu is really your friend. Many benifits like high calcium content, isoflavones preventing specific cancers and the most complete protein in the plant world, IIRC. Quinoa and hempseeds have a pretty good amino acid profile too but are more cumbersome to consume than tofu. It tastes bland on itself but it can transform into many delicious dishes if prepared right.

If you want to learn more about the body building aspects you find a ton of information on the respectice YT channels of above mentioned body builders.

I'd refer to these channels if you want to learn how to cook good whole food plant based dishes:

https://www.youtube.com/@thenarddogcooks https://youtube.com/@pickuplimes https://youtube.com/@healthyveganeating https://www.youtube.com/@RainbowPlantLife https://www.youtube.com/@YEUNGMANCOOKING https://youtube.com/@cheaplazyvegan

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The infos in your comment aren't wrong, but it's missing a crucial point: If you live in a developed country, you're likely eating 2-4 times as much protein as you actually need.

Even when a certain legume has only 70% as much content of a certain amino acid, if you eat double than what you need, you still reach 140%.

[–] OlPatchy2Eyes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not sure what the implication of living in a developed country is. People can have vastly different diets in developed countries and people may have different protein needs. Just because you live in a developed country doesn't make you immune to malnutrition.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it's just something that has to be considered in a wider context and people are bad at that in general.

See my friend who is quite obese and suffering from diabetes including kidney issues and bad liver enzymes, because he was obsessed with being big and lifting heavy things and obsessing about cramming as much 'protein' as he could thinking that weight lifting would burn off all the 'bad stuff'. He got way more protein than even any body builder could possibly need but was still always making a big show at gatherings of eating so much stuff to maintain his physique (which didn't look muscular, he always looked fat, but said his muscles weren't for show and that's why he looked fat not muscular).

So when some post seeks to help folks by indicating good sources of protein, it can trigger people that have no protein issues to make worse decisions, and it's worth pointing out that most people concerned about getting lots of protein almost certainly already have plenty of protein.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

See the following on the concept of complete proteins: https://youtu.be/psAlJtgeQsY

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Explains how elephants are able to get so jacked without consistent income, they just poppin' them peanuts for days!

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Peanut butter is the secret to success

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This would be cool with ratio of protein to calories as well, in the same format.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah protein vs calories would be way more useful than protein vs weight.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Probably should also be noted that you're almost certainly eating more than plenty protein, no matter what you do.
As in, for medical reasons, when people have a dodgy liver, it's helpful to reduce protein intake to what they actually need, but with how much protein our usual diet contains, it's really difficult to get there.

Interesting podcast/video on the topic: https://zoe.com/learn/podcast-should-i-eat-more-protein

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] diablexical@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This may be helpful from a cost / gram of protein but its a bit misleading on the grams protein/ 100 g axis for beans - those are the dry bean numbers.

[–] Bolt@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That seems reasonable, given they presumably use the price for dried beans as well. When you care about price (and therefore about about a price/protein graph) you buy beans dried.

[–] Mountain_Mike_420@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Using a smart pot (like the ninja foodie) makes preparing dried beans a piece of cake. I’ve been making pintos, white beans, and chickpeas (for hummus) on the regular now. Really brought my costs down, especially when buying beans out of the bulk section. Thank god for winco.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Comparing liquid to dry foods on the same chart is completely disingenuous. Also look at any label. Cows milk always has more protein than soy milk.

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I don't see what you mean. The left axis is a measurement of cost per gram of protein. The bottom gives you a measurement of density. So anything lower on the chart is cheap for what you get and then the further right you go the smaller the portion required to consume to get that amount of protein.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This data seems way off - steak has 24-30g of protein per 100g, for example

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would be nice to see cholesterol counts on here as well. Good work though.

[–] EGG_CREAM@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why? I thought dietary cholesterol had little to nothing to do with blood cholesterol levels? That’s what it seems to me like this source is saying, but I’m not an expert by any means.

Source

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sirloin steak needs to be added to this. It's not only cheaper than other steak but it's significantly higher in protein too at 27g per 100g.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

how legumes have more protein per weight than ground beef?

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

80% ground beef is 20% fat

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

80/20 ground beef has 17g of protein per 100g, lentils have 9g per 100g

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

maybe its per dry solids? yeah something doesnt seem right though.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, that's what it is, which is a useless metric.

Cooked Pinto beans are 9 grams of protein per 100 grams.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's dry weight. I just checked the labels on my beans at home. They all approximately 7g protein per 35g beans (i.e. 20g protein per 100g beans).

Most likely dried legumes vs uncooked meat that is full of water.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

What, no grubs?

load more comments
view more: next ›