613
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 220 points 1 week ago

As an organization, they are actively and intentionally interfering with electoral politics. Their lifetime appointments were designed to remove them from that dynamic, but they have decided to bypass that principle. The structure of our federal government is designed to deal with problems like this by having the other branches check them when they step out of line like this. Unfortunately, neither of the other branches have shown any desire to take action. As a result we are currently caught in a self-reinforcing death spiral of anti-democratic corruption that will eventually undo the union unless something changes. What a time to be alive.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago

I think we are supposed to be that something that changes it.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

Peaceful protesting only works for so long.

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 46 points 1 week ago

That's where the second amendment actually does come in for once

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 25 points 1 week ago

If you don't have enough people to win the war by picking up pens and voting, you definitely don't have enough to win by picking up guns and shooting.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Depends. You might not even need to shoot. Those anti mask fuckers got what they wanted by protesting while armed to the teeth.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

It’s the literal reason for the 2nd amendment, there is no arguing that fact.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cmoney@lemmy.world 126 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How can we word this so tRump gets his way but also so Biden doesn't get immunity and when will I get another luxury vacation or motorhome?

Clarence Thomas probably.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] Andonyx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Obligatory: Uncle Tom was actually a good guy. The idea that he was some kind of traitor or such comes from a crappy adaptation of the book. In the actual book he dies to save some other slaves.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

Stephen from Django

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Oh no it's just straight delaying his trial until after the election. They have no problem writing a 100 percent ironclad opinion on presidential immunity and then denying that immunity to Biden for reasons pulled out of a fever dream.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago

I don't know why anyone is surprised. All of the court watchers who aren't MAGA told us SCOTUS would sit on this as long as they possibly could. Which, assuming they're still coloring inside the rules, means the last ruling of the season. And they'll drag out all the other cases too so it doesn't look weird. In fact on Strict Scrutiny they've been warning that the court is dropping a bunch of no contest decisions because they're expecting one big drop with shitty partisan decisions that have no logic beyond the personal politics of the majority.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

That the charges weren't made until late last year is also a failure, the whole process has been unreasonable long.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

That was part of the game though. If any part of that process was sped up for him the Republicans would have ammo in their accusations about the trial. And rich people have long made sure the justice system goes slowly.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

I mean the reasons exist but if the system cannot rapidly respond to attempts to destroy it then those attempts will succeed.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 69 points 1 week ago

MAGA SCOTUS justices in this case, MAGA judge in the classified docs case, MAGA prosecutor in the Georgia case ... good thing we hit him with four cases at the same time.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 55 points 1 week ago

Fucking seriously. How stupid are we that people would see exactly what you laid out and just say "hmmm, oh well the justice system is just slow or something." Except its only with his cases that are in front of Republican appointed "judges."

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

In the case of the supreme court it is painfully obvious. It's because Thomas likes to live like a billionaire and Alito hates gays.

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 week ago

Lula's Brazil had Bolsonaro handled within six months. Banned him from running until 2030 over his January 8th coup attempt in 2023.

The failure to respond in 2021 doomed us all.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago

Subpoena them one by one and confront them about specific issues. For instance Thomas and all those billionaire friends who keep dropping money in his lap. Congress committees have the power to do this.

Let sunlight into the dirty little acts of corruption and impeach. Hit them instead of just complaining all the damn time. Also, six or seven year term limits. Then every single president will get a chance to appoint a couple and the bench makeup will be more balanced.

[-] eric5949@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Congressional subpoenas mean absolutely nothing after Trump's term though. They'll just ignore then and what, you expect Merrick Garland to arrest a Supreme Court Justice for contempt of Congress? If it even gets that far.

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Not so, I believe that Steve Bannon is going to the lockup for ignoring his in a week or so. I don't fancy that the supremes will want to risk that. It just takes will to apply the law. That's it.

Of course, the Dems will huff and puff and do nothing.

[-] eric5949@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Of course, the Dems will huff and puff and do nothing

That's my point, Merrick Garland of all people, Mr I don't want to appear political so I'll slow walk trump, isnt going to arrest a Supreme Court Justice mere months before an election if he ever would in the first place.

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I think that arresting a Supreme isn't going to happen. For a start the legal machinations and appeals will take at least two years. But, a subpoena is at least fighting back, and a threat. What is the alternative? Hand wringing?

The Conservatives wake up each and every day actively trying to destroy the American republic. Do you think that overturning Roe was just luck? That was a 25 year process. I'm not advocating violence, but just not taking it when your balls get stomped. There are shocking things that can be done. Boosting the bench to overcome the current bias, bringing in terms limits, and subpoenas for corruption. The subpoena won't necessarily lead to impeachment or arrest, but it will bring out every little dirty detail in public. Do you think that's not a threat to a dirty bench?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

If Gym Jordan doesn't have to comply with a congressional subpoena, what makes you think Clarence Thomas will?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

Instead of "rotten", the title should use "completely predictable".

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

Like leaving a mayonnaise container to age in the sun.

[-] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[-] aniki@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

This country will not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Cause the coup has not ended yet.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 24 points 1 week ago

It won't end until they succeed. This isn't stopping with trump they will continue until they have permanent control. They can see the writing on the wall and that the numbers don't look good for their future in government so they need to solidify that control.

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah, typical fascists.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

The “hand is not hidden”. It’s out in public with a raised middle finger to democracy and our way of life.

[-] Kaput@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Please USA, don't go full Nazi. That would be quite inconvenient for your neighbors, and the world probably.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

You have been permanently banned from c/Conservative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it's a real mystery.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 14 points 1 week ago

Why should we be surprised? As a nation, we've shown the justices that there are no consequences. It seems they are not beholden to anybody.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

It’s intentional specifically to buy the orange turd as much time as they possibly can, maybe delay the trial until after the election.

Which is incredibly stupid.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 1 week ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


For those looking for the hidden hand of politics in what the Supreme Court does, there’s plenty of reason for suspicion on Donald Trump’s as-yet-undecided immunity case given its urgency.

But it’s considerably more drawn out than the schedule the court established earlier this year on a challenge from Colorado after that state took Mr. Trump off its presidential primary ballot.

The court is a busy place, though the justices are completing decisions at the second slowest rate since the 1946 term, according to a recent article in The Wall Street Journal.

And yet Mr. Trump’s lawyers continued to take the untenable position, in response to questioning, that a president who orders the assassination of a political rival could not face criminal charges (absent impeachment by the House and conviction in the Senate).

In 1974, the Watergate special prosecutor squared off against President Richard Nixon over his refusal to release Oval Office tape recordings of his conversations with aides.

Even if presidents enjoy some immunity for official acts, plotting to remain in office while continuing to question the results of an election they clearly lost isn’t one of them.


The original article contains 1,151 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
613 points (98.1% liked)

politics

18042 readers
3045 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS