403
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 141 points 1 week ago
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 35 points 1 week ago

Funny how we so easily mistake one cataclysm for another

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Its like school shootings, they all blur together and its hard to keep them all straightened out.

[-] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Once, as a teenager, I switched channels on the TV, and there was a movie. A caption appeared on screen: "Rhode Island".

"Nice!" I thought. "I always like movies set in cultures that are very foreign to mine."

As the movie went on, I was increasingly confused, as those Greeks, or Turks, seemed very similar to US Americans, and the setting appeared to be the USA. (It was dubbed in French, so I couldn't tell from the language)

I soon figured that it must be a location in the USA named after an Old World location.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

New England has two types of place names. Old English colonial names and Native ones. Like a river called Woonasquatucket from the very same state you mentioned, Rhode Island.

[-] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Interesting.

Here in Québec, most towns and villages either have a native name, or saint's name.

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

From Columbus to the see

load more comments (41 replies)
[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 62 points 1 week ago

I'm so glad that Norfolk Southern is going to pay for all of the necessary remediation. Really a very considerate, and socially/ enviromentally conscious company. Bravo!

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 week ago

What are you talking about? Some politician grimaced as he took a sip of water and another one put it to his lips without actually taking a sip. Everything is fine!

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 9 points 1 week ago

Just hoping to shame Norfolk Southern into action. It was worth inconveniencing a few electrons/ photons, dammit.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

It took me a minute to remember that this happened in Ohio and not the Middle East.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

It would be a shame if all those states sued the train company for damages.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

It’s 2024. Why are trains still derailing? Surely there’s a better engineering design than this.

[-] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Rail workers do not have the proper time to fully inspect cars and arrange them in the proper order due to understaffing and the high volume created by maximized rail schedules that prioritize profits over safety.

That's a huge reason why rail workers wanted to go on strike before there was bipartisan cooperation led by Biden to take away their labor rights.

[-] dumbluck@midwest.social 12 points 1 week ago

It's cheaper to pay the fines when accidents happen than it is to run the trains safely. Just the cost of doing business.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

The engineering is fine, great even. Executives have demanded that the trains run at the red line, for maximum profit. With no safety margin, when something goes wrong it goes really really wrong. That's why it was so important to hold them accountable and so fucked that we didn't. It's just a matter of time until the next accident.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

It's effectively impossible to engineer around knowingly unsafe operation. The trains are fine, it's the railroads operating them unsafely and the state and federal governments refusing to maintain infrastructure that is the problem.

[-] jake_jake_jake_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

i wish the govt was in charge of maintaining the infrastructure, and i wish the govt owned the infrastructure then prioritized passenger traffic over freight so we could get some semblance of a working regional rail system.

[-] brenstar@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago

prioritized passenger traffic over freight

Technically that’s already the law. But freight lines don’t care because the law isn’t enforced

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

They often do prioritize passenger trains, but if it's single track already occupied by a long, slow freight train, the passenger train is going to have to wait anyway.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I dunno. You never hear about high speed rail in Japan derailing, or the monorail at DisneyWorld going off the track. There was some crazy invention ages ago where a train with a gyroscope actually traveled on a single rail. We’ve got to do better than this.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah, because they actually care about safety and put money into maintenance.

Most derailments happen due to operational error such as too much speed for the track (preventable with ATC), equipment failure (preventable with better inspection and maintenance) or external factors like a car on the tracks (not really preventable without major gate upgrades).

The only real technological innovations are automated train systems, but that technology already exists, we just don't use it in the US because the private rail operators make more money by cutting corners, not spending on upgrades.

[-] gramie@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It does happen in Japan.

In 2005, 106 passengers were killed and more than 500 injured.

[-] Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

That’s almost 20 years ago…

[-] Steve@startrek.website 12 points 1 week ago

Thats line saying why are bridges still collapsing

Because zero effort has been put into maintenance!

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Boats still sink, planes and cars still crash. Fundamentally, transportation will fail. The question is are these failures within an acceptable rate due to unforseen issues, or is this a problem with the system that operates and profits off of these devices, letting safety slip to maximize profit?

[-] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe have a transportation secretary who has experience in transportation, as opposed to being a consultant and focusing on ticket refunds instrad of aircraft doors coming off and trains exploding...or would that hurt profitability?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
403 points (98.8% liked)

News

21687 readers
3182 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS