99
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 47 points 5 days ago

“I took away all funding for the arts. Don’t worry, I have a plan. You can now shoot bears. There, everyone is happy.”

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 31 points 5 days ago

Huh, Florida has bears, I didn't even think that bears lived that far south.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 25 points 5 days ago

There's a bunch of black bears in NW Florida. During the hell years I lived there 911 would get calls about them in yards and the advice was to leave them alone unless they are hurting someone. Animal control wouldn't come out if there wasn't a threat. They were usually just meandering between forest patches. And it was illegal to shoot them in most circumstances; especially since most of this was in subdivisions.

This would effectively allow cowboys to start blasting in your neighborhoods. Probably leaving rotting corpses of young black bears on the corner or in the streets.

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 5 points 5 days ago

They're in central Florida, too. Probably all over the state.

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Where the fuck do you think Gentle Ben lived riding around on his fan boat?

[-] HWK_290@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Ah yes, Gentle Ben, the cultural highlight of... checks notes... 1967

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 7 points 5 days ago

Who the fuck is Gentle Ben?

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

A fucking bear tv show where the bear lived with Clint Howard whose dad was a forest ranger in the everglades. Just like Lassie and Flipper except with a bear.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I had one cruise in my dog door.

[-] invertedspear@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

Bigger than the average bear, booboo

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Had one cruise in my dog door when a friend was house sitting. So I learned a lot about black bears after that.

"imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury"

You could always shoot them in that case. In any case, what problem are they trying to solve here?

And as to the, "shoot first ask questions later", you could already do that. If I wanted to hunt or kill a black bear, I'd simply say it was attacking me. And who would say different?

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Ahhh, but if you read the article, this is different. This redefines it to "if you PERCEIVE there to be a threat of death or injury" - meaning that any suburban cowboy can just blast the bear wandering through their backyard and not hurting anyone because "well I figured it would hurt my kids if it came towards the house". Kinda like how Wyoming relaxed hunting laws to allow farmers to kill pretty much whatever wolves they came across.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Thank God he's protecting us from black bears The only bear that we can scare away. If a grizzly is coming at you unless you got a really powerful weapon you're done and if a polar bear notices you you're done. Black bear wave your arms and run at it and it's scared away.. there's a video of two old people walking out of their house with a black bear on the porch.... They don't see the black bear but it sees them and turns around running scared as hell....

[-] SilverFlame@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I don't think there are grizzlies and polar bears in Florida. Maybe in a zoo?

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Shit.... you know those bears aren't excluded from the law right?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 5 days ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed a controversial bill into law on Friday that allows residents to shoot bears if they perceive a threat, sparking debate and concern among wildlife advocates and others.

The new law, which goes into effect on July 1, permits individuals to use lethal force against bears if they believe there is an "imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury" to a person, pet, or substantial damage to a dwelling.

Elizabeth Fleming, senior Florida representative with Defenders of Wildlife, told Politico on Friday that the bill signing was "very unfortunate" and suggested that legal challenges may be forthcoming.

The bill's sponsor, Florida state Representative Jason Shoaf, a Republican, faced some lighthearted criticism during the legislative process for his colorful language describing the need for the law.

This viral comment led to a humorous exchange in the Legislature, including a reference to the 2023 movie Cocaine Bear by Eskamani who playfully questioned whether Shoaf was aware that the film was not a documentary.

As the law takes effect next month, state wildlife officials will likely face the challenge of balancing public safety concerns with the need to protect Florida's bear population.


The original article contains 579 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Which kind of bear is best?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I always favored the Kamchatka Grizzly my self.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Lookin' straight up Grrrizzlay

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

It's a Good Thing Republicans don't pass laws that allow you to do the SAME THING to a Human!

Give you three guesses what color the bears are.

[-] Blackout@kbin.run 3 points 5 days ago
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
99 points (94.6% liked)

politics

18042 readers
3614 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS