64
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Latimer pulled in the endorsement of former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Holy shit just fuck off to obscurity you POS. Nobody wants to hear from you. All the power you've wielded and you've done NOTHING good with it. Americas marge thatcher

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Americas marge thatcher

Wasn’t that Reagan?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

Ok, so she's America's FEMALE Maggie and should go to her farm and stay there.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Hey now Margret Thatcher did at least two good things, protected the Falklands from Argentina and died. Hillary Clinton has done neither.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Just another example of how, if you're even marginally out of the mainstream of politics, you will be perpetually disappointed with our government.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s political action committee spent nearly $15 million on the primary, filling airwaves and mailboxes with negative ads in an effort to unseat Bowman, who has accused the influential pro-Israel lobbying group of trying to buy the race.

“The outcome in this race once again shows that the pro-Israel position is both good policy and good politics — for both parties,” the American Israel Public Affairs Committee said in a statement.

15 fucking million dollars, and AIPAC claims this primary shows voters support Israel...

Fuck any politician who takes a dime in bribes from a foreign country. I'm never voting for anyone that takes AIPAC money, regardless of what letter is by their name.

It's a big tent, but it doesn't have room for genocide.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

It's a big tent, but it doesn't have room for genocide.

Evidently, it doesn't have room for opposition to genocide.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Foreign interference in US elections works.

Congratulations to all pro-genocide centrists. Netanyahu bought you a candidate.

EDIT: three articles about this so far. When anti-genocide candidates lose, this community is where the party's at.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

~~Pro-Israel Centrist~~ genocide-denying conservative sponsored by the fascist apartheid regime currently committing genocide

There, fixed it for them

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Once again Democrats back and push for a conservative in the primary. Really fucking sad and why I'll never donate to the party ever again.

Dem leadership silently smiling and counting their money.

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Are there odds this guy flips to being an R if he wins the general?

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Doubtful. He’s very far left of the modern GOP on almost all other issues. Third line on his website is his gender pronouns.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Anyone with a functional brain in far left of the modern MAGA pro-fascist pro-grifter GOP.

Wouldn't be the first time we've been duped by a "leftist" as soon as the $5 bills come out

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Nothing centrist about that lazy eye amirite

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Bowman should run as an independent.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

It's a 17 point spread. Unless he can get an entire section of voters to flip it's wasted money and effort. In the general election the republicans there would be easily convinced to vote for the Dem's guy.

[-] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 2 points 2 days ago

Or worse yet, they split the vote and a solid blue seat sends a Republican to Congress with 35-40% of the vote. I just love FPTP!

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's why the Dems let AIPAC pick the most racist conservative candidate they could find willing to run blue. In a general election red voters might actually struggle there.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 3 days ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


George Latimer, a pro-Israel centrist, defeated U.S. Rep. Jamaal Bowman on Tuesday in a Democratic primary in suburban New York that highlighted the party’s deep divisions over the war in Gaza.

Most current members of Congress have been able to repel challenges from within their party, though GOP Rep. Bob Good is in a tight contest with a rival backed by Donald Trump in a race that is too close to call.

In the final stretch of the race, he rallied with liberals Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders, while Latimer pulled in the endorsement of former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Also on Tuesday, Democratic voters on Long Island picked former CNN anchor John Avlon as the candidate who will challenge incumbent Republican Rep. Nick LaLota in a district that’s been controlled by the GOP for a decade.

The Long Island congressional district has become a priority for Democrats as the party tries to flip suburban seats in New York as part of a strategy to win a House majority.

In central New York, two other Democrats are vying to become the party’s nominee to take on U.S. Rep. Brandon Williams, a Republican who represents a recently reconfigured congressional district where President Joe Biden beat Trump by 11 points in the 2020 election.


The original article contains 1,096 words, the summary contains 214 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago

Latimer claimed, on CNN, that over 50% of his funding was from people in the district, while over 90% of Bowman's was from outside. Couldn't get Bowman's response to that because he declined CNN's invite to appear. Is that what Dems need - pols who can't be bothered to appear on major cable networks?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Latimer claimed, on CNN, that over 50% of his funding was from people in the district

Local headquarters or not, AIPAC represents Israel, NOT Bronx.

while over 90% of Bowman's was from outside.

Gonna need a source on that. The ass of a conservative Zionist genocide enabler doesn't count.

Couldn't get Bowman's response to that because he declined CNN's invite to appear.

Probably has better things to with his time than fend off the bad faith questions of billionaire-owned media

Is that what Dems need - pols who can't be bothered to appear on major cable networks?

Much better than a corrupt genocide enabler at any rate.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If you screech genocide or Zionist enough times you don't win, but in fact you lose.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

If you ~~screech~~ protect genocide ~~or Zionist~~ and Zionism enough times you don't win. ~~8n fact you~~ In fact we all lose.

There, fixed it for you. You want another boot to lick or have you had your fill for the day?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

As the previous, pretty weak.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Whatever you need to tell yourself to downplay your complicity 🤷

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

While totally ignoring your own complicity. Well done.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

How the fuck am I complicit in a genocide I roundly condemn at every opportunity??

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Your agnst drives stupidity. So you take a totally valid criticism of a candidate who lost and make it all about your current Cause célèbre, one which you are aware of only on a surface level. Why you think I would have any interest in that I do not know, yet here we are.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Your agnst drives stupidity

Bold words from someone too worked up and/or stupid to do even cursory proofreading on his reflexive insistence on alternative facts 🙄

totally valid criticism of a candidate who lost

Based on what, other than the word of an unregistered foreign agent trying to overcorrect with the "I'm for the locals!" demagoguery?

your current Cause célèbre one which you are aware of only on a surface level.

Says a lot about you that you automatically assume that people only care about the most heinous of crimes against humanity because it's "trending right now" and are utterly ignorant if they don't agree with the right wing establishment orthodoxy.

I've been advocating for Palestine independence since before the Oslo Accords, dumbass.

Why you think I would have any interest in that I do not know, yet here we are.

Now that you mention it, you DO strike me as extremely incurious and thus susceptible to deep seated confirmation bias. Better not waste any more time on your willfully ignorant ass.

Have the day you deserve.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Again, I'm really not interested in your jabber. You can repeat as many times as you wish, but that will not improve that fact.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
64 points (91.0% liked)

politics

18042 readers
3045 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS