273

This is what the decision by the Republican justices to allow "gratuities" for public officials creates an incentive for.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 134 points 2 days ago

The republicans finally got what they wanted. They’ve basically killed the government’s ability to regulate.

Get ready to be fucked by corporations and billionaires in lots of new ways.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago

Nope, the social contract is broken. Organize immediately, protest everywhere. They want savages we can provide.

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

I'd argue protest and organization is part of the social contract as well. So if we're past the social contract them...

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

You still need to organize. One dude throwing Molotovs doesn't get much done besides getting arrested. A crowd of people? We know they're terrified of those.

Either way, no scary big protests, no going back to a sane reality. Shit, it might take pulling them from their seats if we dont want Christofascism setting in.

Doing what we are now? This country is lost. Those debates were embarrassing. Its up to the people now.

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ahahahaha this is a settler colonial nation. The colonized are too weak to do anything and settlers have proven for centuries they won't do anything until they absolutely positively have to.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Thinking through this: it will swamp Congress with every minor little detail, bringing progress to a standstill. There's just too much stuff, that's partly why agencies are set up.

AND Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, and Senate) to pass anything (any of these details). Dems have had that for only 4 of the last 24 years. The GOP gets to block any of this when they have a single one of those (20 of the last 24 years). If you thought there was a lack of progress before, it's going to be tenfold going forward. VOTE (for Dems, not 3rd party).

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

What will happen is that no regulations will get passed, or they’ll continue ask their special interest to write laws for themselves because Congress is too busy to do law making. Ugh.

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

What will happen is not enough people voting for a dem party that doesn’t magically grant wishes hence they get no votes…

All while Fox News tells you what reality is…

When it comes to keeping up with politics… Policy is one thing, motivation is another, and rat fucking is something altogether different.

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago

Great. Awesome. This way our regulatory agencies can be hamstrung just like prosecutors going after crooked cops with qualified immunity. Unless the law specifically states what is to be regulated and how, then agencies can't do shit.

Just like how if the law doesn't specifically state that a police officer can't do a thing, it's fair game!

This is such a disastrously stupid ruling, further curtailing our ability to combat climate change and all but dismisses any authority the EPA and other agencies were once afforded.

conservatives have such a boner for the vagaries of the second amendment, squeezing in as many assault rifles as they can into something original drawn up with fucking muzzle loaded muskets in mind. But as soon as anything vague in law is used to do good, they'd rather throw out democracy than risk doing the right thing.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

"honestly this whole democracy thing has gotten out of control"

-The GOP, probably

[-] Evrala@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

A concerning number of republicans have been running on a public platform of eliminating democracy.

Qualified immunity only protects cops from civil suits, not criminal charges.

Prosecution doesn't go after them because they're on the same team.

[-] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Theoretically could congress pass laws stating that the EPA has the right to regulate all chemicals if they do choose? I'm sure it would also have ramifications I suppose

[-] Happywop@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Curse the democrats for " taking the high road " with these terrorists when Moscow mitch was playing his fuckery

[-] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

Does no one else see that Clarence Thomas (who has been accused [with proof] that he took millions in "gifts") is sitting on a court that just overturned a rule the would hold him accountable to receiving those gifts?

What the actual fuck?

[-] knova@infosec.pub 11 points 2 days ago

Yeah we see it but we are talking about a different thing here

[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago

This fucking sucks. Why is it that the right thinks science and expertise is an opinion? I'm so fucking sick of these fascist cunts.

This right wing bullshit is starting to happen all over the western world. Seriously, what can we do about this? What can we realistically do to stop the right? Because everything is being completely fucked.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Why is it that the right thinks science and expertise is an opinion?

They work off belief and faith, that's what religion is. So they project that everyone else thinks and works the same way, aka they think science is a belief and faith. It's always projection.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's never been about belief or faith. This goes back to the tobacco lobby when progressives were considered progressive because they followed the advice and research of experts. Conservatives couldn't get away with doing whatever they wanted to do because progressives had facts and evidence to back up their platforms. While progressives were relying on input from third-party think tanks, conservatives invented their own think tanks by buying off professors from prestigious universities who needed more money and were willing to write bad-faith research.

Conservatives don't believe in anything other than money, power, and self-indulgence—they just muddied the waters enough to make facts and research look questionable. Finally, when people point to facts and figures, conservatives can point to their own tainted research and pretend like they believe their own lies.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's a bit simpler. Those facts, evidence, research, and experts? The religious right thinks that's all faith and belief, because that's how they work. That's really what they think. It's mind boggling but that's what they think.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

We're going to have to start organizing at the grassroots level. Folks will need to develop a class consciousness that transcends cultural boundaries and harnesses the power of the internet. The major eras of civil rights expansion and reversal of the otherwise upward mobilization of wealth only came with significant grassroots organization, public protest, political activism, and sadly, bloodshed.

Rights aren't granted. They're taken.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 days ago

If you're in the US, the basic answer looks like this:

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Protest every day until they collapse or the system does.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Well we are fucked. The fix is in. Who else has an escape plan?

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

My last ditch escape plan, thankfully, is perfectly legal and encouraged thanks to the Republicans. In fact there's three stories that facilitate it within walking distance of me. Plus a few liquor stores to calm the nerves first. So I'm good.

[-] Happywop@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Your goals and aim would be appreciated by all

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

Anyone needing a refresher:

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test for when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency's interpretation of a law or statute.

[-] pubquiz@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

One step closer to the abyss.

The United States of America used to be thought of as an ideal, an aspiration. Now? It's a shithole backwater filled with toothless grins and guns that anyone with a sane mind wants to avoid like the plague. The USA is the punchline to the joke: "What happens when you give an AK-47 to a chimp?"

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Don't insult a chimps intelligence like that. Not cool.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

What is the punchline?

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

The United States of America used to be thought of as an ideal, an aspiration.

For white ppl and select immigrants. For everyone else this country has always been a shithole

[-] Spazz@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 2 days ago

Republikkklowns

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Haha the facade liberalism's "law and order" has completely collapsed.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
273 points (99.6% liked)

politics

18059 readers
3532 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS