this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
631 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3813 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bashbeerbash@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Welp. The Supreme Clergy that now rules what used to be the US has established King Trump as the leader of the Christian Caliphate that's coming. Conservatives are gonma love living in the white version of Iran.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Biden can now legally shoot Trump on stage during the next debate. Gotcha.

I don't think having a raspy voice will be the biggest talking point in the aftermath this time.

And if anyone raises a stink and somehow manages to prove that this was illegal anyway, I'm sure it's the same people who have claimed that he's senile, ergo not fit to stand trial.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Biden could, but he won't. We're just going to get more finger wagging and muttering at him about being a scoundrel and shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

Last person out, please turn out the lights.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Surely if something he does is unconstitutional, it is not within his official capacity or power!?
But somehow I have a feeling I'm being extremely naive just thinking that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 20 points 4 months ago

The SCOTUS can lick my fucking SCROTUS.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (8 children)

If anyone ever doubted that the DNC and the GOP weren't on the same team, just watch as the DNC let this opportunity slip right through their fingers. Access to the greatest political, strategical, minds and they will let this opening wash away into a river of fascism.

It's a play, we are watching theatre. Meant to keep you distracted. Meant to keep you oppressed.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

As an official act, dissolve the current supreme court and reverse every terrible decision they made.

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (7 children)

The big thing everyone is missing here is the ruling says the president cannot be prosecuted for actions that are constitutional. So this does not mean the end of democracy or whatever people are saying. The president can't stay in office after his term expires. The president cannot order his political opponents killed- in fact, the Supreme Court issued a statement on that just this year.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-939/303384/20240319133828340_AFPI%20Amici%20Brief%203.19.24.pdf

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 28 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Amici curae aren't Supreme Court decisions. "Amici curae" means "friend of the court". It's an argument from third parties submitted for a pending case. The dissents by the actual Supreme Court justices explicitly reference the assassination potential.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ech@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago

You say that like it's a defined thing that will keep a president in check. SCOTUS rules on constitutionality. Are you really that confident that they'll keep Trump in line if he gets another term and starts really getting to work? The road to fascism isn't paved with goods intentions, it's paved with mealy mouthed, two faced decisions like this that give more and more leeway until it's too late to take back.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Democracy in the USA ended today. It will be in the history books about the end of democracy.

[–] bashbeerbash@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

for reference this same move of getting immunity from a fixed court was also huge for cementing the Chavez and Putin regimes in Venezuela and Russia.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›