this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
94 points (100.0% liked)

games

20446 readers
448 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Frank@hexbear.net 43 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"The origin of that idea is actually due to a personal experience where a car suddenly stopped on a hillside after some heavy snow and started to slip," says Miyazaki. "The car following me also got stuck, and then the one behind it spontaneously bumped into it and started pushing it up the hill... That's it! That's how everyone can get home! Then it was my turn and everyone started pushing my car up the hill, and I managed to get home safely."

"But I couldn't stop the car to say thanks to the people who gave me a shove. I'd have just got stuck again if I'd stopped. On the way back home I wondered whether the last person in the line had made it home, and thought that I would probably never meet the people who had helped me. I thought that maybe if we'd met in another place we'd become friends, or maybe we'd just fight..."

"You could probably call it a connection of mutual assistance between transient people. Oddly, that incident will probably linger in my heart for a long time. Simply because it's fleeting, I think it stays with you a lot longer... like the cherry blossoms we Japanese love so much."

Miyazaki describing his inspiration for the cooperative summoning system. He's not all gloom and doom. The multiplayer is kind strangers finding each other in adversity and choosing mutual aid.

[–] Rojo27@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago

Yeah. Like the grind was cool for me since it was the first time I really poured some effort into a Fromsoft game, but I think the best moments were when I teamed up with other players to beat some of the tougher bosses. It kind of sucks that a lot of Souls-likes don't have this sort of feature, and really its one of the things that separates the original from many of those that strive to be like them. Lies of P felt a bit like that where it was missing that element. I eventually gave up on it, which sucks because I thought the story was good enough, but I just got tired.

[–] Darthsenio_Mall@hexbear.net 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Werner Herzog: [On the jungle] Kinski always says it's full of erotic elements. I don't see it so much erotic. I see it more full of obscenity. It's just - Nature here is vile and base. I wouldn't see anything erotical here. I would see fornication and asphyxiation and choking and fighting for survival and... growing and... just rotting away. Of course, there's a lot of misery. But it is the same misery that is all around us. The trees here are in misery, and the birds are in misery. I don't think they - they sing. They just screech in pain. It's an unfinished country. It's still prehistorical. The only thing that is lacking is - is the dinosaurs here. It's like a curse weighing on an entire landscape. And whoever... goes too deep into this has his share of this curse. So we are cursed with what we are doing here. It's a land that God, if he exists has - has created in anger. It's the only land where - where creation is unfinished yet. Taking a close look at - at what's around us there - there is some sort of a harmony. It is the harmony of... overwhelming and collective murder. And we in comparison to the articulate vileness and baseness and obscenity of all this jungle - Uh, we in comparison to that enormous articulation - we only sound and look like badly pronounced and half-finished sentences out of a stupid suburban... novel... a cheap novel. We have to become humble in front of this overwhelming misery and overwhelming fornication... overwhelming growth and overwhelming lack of order. Even the - the stars up here in the - in the sky look like a mess. There is no harmony in the universe. We have to get acquainted to this idea that there is no real harmony as we have conceived it. But when I say this, I say this all full of admiration for the jungle. It is not that I hate it, I love it. I love it very much. But I love it against my better judgment.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is the kind of person I would want as a drinking buddy.

[–] motherofmonsters@hexbear.net 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I have a friend who had a meeting with him. He told stories like this the whole time. He’s just like this 100% of the time

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If I could pay him to, I'd love for him to narrate some episodes of Jackass with his own script

[–] Darthsenio_Mall@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

lmao agreed. definitely not anywhere near as good but here's a website i just found of ai herzog and ai zizek having an endless conversation that amused me for several minutes.

[–] Nacarbac@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

One of the Comedy Bang Bang regulars does a good Werner Herzog.

[–] AndJusticeForAll@hexbear.net 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Also, how do I stop getting my friend, whomst I'm playing Dark Souls 1 with, from saying "hit the bonny" as in "before I let you play just let me hit the bonny real quick and level up."

I hate it and when I bring it up he pretends he hasn't heard what I said. He also removes the pants portion of the character's armour whenever he plays for some reason, saying it probably gives him more i-frames. I put the pants back on when I play.

[–] booty@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago

Nah I'm on his side you can't be mid rolling in dark souls smh

[–] Goadstool@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

*less cool friend

[–] magi@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh the boney agony-shivering They Irish or Scottish?

[–] AndJusticeForAll@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] magi@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

Ah I see, common to call them boneys where I'm from. I wasn't aware that any Aussies used the slang ^^

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

the romans would frequently talk about how going beyond the mediterranean is a folly, dead and foreign gods dwell in the seas, elements become fickle and nonstatic, the world begins to unwind after a certain point so you may as well forget what you know, you are not as adapted to new climates as the humans there are and it felt like nature knew this. deadly animals and diseases were far more numerous and the technology was much poorer and you didnt have the logistics to fix or replace what breaks.

honestly, strong agree. theres a few pockets of oasis that we have all dug ourselves into and tamed. the world itself is dangerous as hell without modern technology.

[–] Barx@hexbear.net 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The world is dangerous but we should also not forget people who live and lived without what we call modern technology and they did so pretty well. Many people have repeatedly chosen a lifestyle that is closer to hunter-gathering than anything else, even when agriculture and infrastructure were available as alternatives. They used and use different technologies, in their own ways highly sophisticated and with a form of social organization that is arguably more sustainable (it's not capitalism, for one thing). This is/was much more feasible in areas where there were lower populations and very large amounts of natural resources so that finding food and shelter and building tools etc was not particularly challenging. We live in a world we have damaged significantly. Far fewer fish, plants, frogs, etc. The bison massacred for genocide. The bedouin forced into factories and fields. Entire landscapes left to go fallow when they had been curated by humans despite Western impressions of "the wild".

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Reading old texts is a little hobby of mine and my book club. It's really fascinating how teeming with life the world used to be. Some fishers would talk about being able to almost walk on water from all the Fish off the new england coast

[–] Barx@hexbear.net 14 points 3 months ago

Yes and imagine how you could live if getting a fish meant just waking over to a pool and grabbing one. Obviously we can do that now by going to a store and handing over cash, but the convenience was surprisingly not that massively different when ecosystems were healthier and you didn't have to go get that cash by working an hour or two somewhere first.

Not that it's all perfect or is/was monolithic. Many fishing cultures had slaves and such. Humans have organized themselves in many different ways. But there are also ways in which are modern lifestyles and technologies don't represent a massive improvement in our lives. Mostly due to capitalism, of course, which claws back our gains in different ways. If we organized ourselves around human need we could all be living qualitatively better lives.

[–] ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

With where we are at as a species technologically, everyone could be living better in terms of quality of life than any ruler did a millennia ago. Turns out disease and a variety of produce is pretty cool.

[–] T34_69@hexbear.net 19 points 3 months ago

could be

Found it, there's your problem right there, this load-bearing strut is totally compromised!

[–] Gorb@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So bloodborne really was based on England after all