this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
313 points (96.4% liked)

Science Memes

10897 readers
962 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 59 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We've been through some rough times [4-7]

What the heck would those citations be‽

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 26 points 4 months ago

Later in the article he mentions that [7] was a study of her mood swings.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

[4] Broman, Chad 2015 Why is Valentine's Day so Important? A Time Analysis of Tiffany’s Relationship Expectations :: Journal of Psychological Machine Learning

[5] Broman, Chad 2016 A Play by Play Analysis of Purchasing a Luxury Speedboat during an out of Wedlock Pregnancy Scare :: Journal of Psychological Machine Learning

[6] Broman, Chad 2016 The Mood Metric Equivalent Measurement: How to Get Away with a 150$ Bar Tab :: Journal of Psychological Machine Learning

[7] Broman, Chad 2021 A Time Series Analysis of My Girlfriend’s Mood Swings :: Journal of Astrological Big Data Ecology

[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago

Chad Broman

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is there more? I kind of want to know more

[–] voicesarefree@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 32 points 4 months ago

As discovered from [4], she will not continue to love me if I do not share an equal love for the workplace based drama.

My favorite line

[–] haerrii@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago

Thanks for letting me find that hilarious journal

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I legit would love to discuss sub-Nyquist sampling. I worked in the field for a few years.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Nyquist theorem, in very simple terms, describes the minimum measurements you need to take to capture all the information in a signal. It turns out, if you have special information about what signal you expect to see, you can still figure it out using fewer measurements.

Generally speaking, it tells you how many measurements you need to take to capture the whole signal.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Or in terms of practical applications, it explains why CDs are "good enough" and audiophile stuff is very often bullshit.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Instead of actually explaining it, here's how I like to remember it: If you are measuring something that produces a perfect sine wave, and you can't take measurements faster than 30 Hz, then you can't definitively prove that the sine wave repeats faster than that. No matter how many data points you collect, the actual frequency could always be double what your measurements suggest.

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

This is so deliciously nerdy

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 5 points 4 months ago

this is hilarious!! 😂😂

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Try to*

Get peer reviewed/edited, nerd!

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Very well put together but

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wtf? If your girlfriend is annoying you by just talking then why don't you break up? This whole thing screams sexist tropes about women! Don't care if some of it is funny play on scientific terms but the underlying assumptions of gender roles are disgusting...

[–] OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah was rather hard to see past the generic sexism