Do not start a headline with "Darkness reigns over Wikipedia"!!!
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
864 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
59211 readers
2519 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What's wrong with Darkness?
At last, I won’t get blinded whenever I open Wikipedia
These are dark times
Indeed.
No, thats the job hunting website. Wikipedia is the one anyone can edit historical facts.
(Which is apparently a workspace AI company)
The year is 2024, hacker news stands strong as only remaining website to not offer darkmode.
Thou art forbidden to peruse our content in the dead of night; verily, our content is for the light of day alone.
GG
Get on my level.
How long were you searching for “worse than Comic Sans” before you landed on that one?
That purp though, fully behind it
load more comments
(3 replies)
If you are on desktop and you aren't sure how it works, try out this Wiki page and in the top right corner you can see an "eyeglasses" looking icon. Click that and set it to Automatic or Dark.
Wikipedia is such a beauty and I'm so glad and grateful it exists. Surely it's not perfect, but it's so inspiring and hopeful to see a collective effort be so successful. I sometimes wonder, what new projects we've seen since that are equally inspiring. The Fediverse certainly is beautiful but it's also still a little bit fringe. I personally really like MusicBrainz, but that started 24 years ago What new collective projects has the internet brought us in recent years? And what collective projects could the future bring us?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Very happy to see it come to wikipedia!!
But I think it also needs some polish. The contrast is too high and the blue on black of the hyperlinks is too garish for sure.
Hello DarkReader my old friend...
~~Which you still need for mobile~~. Edit: Nope.
Nope, its available on mobile too. Just go to
Sidebar>Settings>Colour
(Options to choose from)
-
Light
-
Dark
-
Automatic
load more comments
(5 replies)
The Wikipedia app has had dark mode for a while. Plus dark mode in Firefox works fine with no extensions.
load more comments
(2 replies)
The Washington Post: "Democracy dies in darkness"
Wikipedia: "Knowledge that is shared in torchlight is fucking awesome"
Democracy dies in darkness
From what I've seen, it dies in plain sight to standing ovations
load more comments
(1 replies)
I thought this was gonna be about Wikipedia finally shutting down because nobody donates
They are actually getting too many donations, many times more than they need to run wikipedia. There was and is a big conflict about the unsustainable growth of donations to the foundation and its questionable use of those funds.
Wikimedia Foundation (the org behind the Wikipedia and similar projects) does get more donations than their operational cost, but that's expected. The idea is that they'll invest the extra fund^1 and some day the return alone will be able to sustain Wikipedia forever.
Although, some have criticized that the actual situation is not clearly conveyed in their asking for donation message. It gives people an impression that Wikipedia is going under if you don't donate.
Others also criticized that the feature development is slow compared to the funding, or that not enough portion is allocated to the feature development. See how many years it takes to get dark mode! I don't know how it's decided or what's their target, so I can't really comment on this.
They publish their annual financial auditions^2 and you can have a read if you're interested. There are some interesting things. For example, in 2022-2023, processing donations actually costs twice as much as internet hosting, which one would expect to be the major expense.
Similar to Mozilla (but not from donations but instead of its millions paid to it by Google)
Huh, now that is a truly interesting bit of information.
load more comments
(16 replies)
Finally I don’t need to have an account just to have dark mode
finnaly I'll use wikipedia on my laptop more
Finally the l33t hax0rz from Anonymous can browse Wikipedia in peace
Dark mode, night mode, light-on-dark design, or whatever you want to call the version of computer content that doesn't feel blindingly bright at night...
Don't wanna be that guy, but these template news-article openings always make my brain hurt. Come on, as if everyone has ever called it anything else than "Dark mode".
All jokes aside, I might imagine it wasn't all easy to do it correctly. Great job!
I can’t be the only one who doesn’t see well with dark mode.
You're not, but having both is awesoooooome!
Isn't this like one of the signs of the end times?
Or the start of a new age of enlightment and the spread of ideas online with ease.
load more comments
(1 replies)
A long time coming, but because of their recent changes in the past couple of months if I have JS disabled on Wikipedia I either have an obnoxiously large blank margin on the right, or I get pop-up annoyed by this dark mode announcement with JS enabled and private tab browsing.
load more comments
(2 replies)
democracy dies in dark mode
It doesn't seem to work on the German Wikipedia. Super weird decision to tie display settings to a language.
load more comments
(2 replies)
LOL took 'em long enough.
view more: next ›