this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
1353 points (97.6% liked)

Comic Strips

12725 readers
3019 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 120 points 3 months ago (14 children)

Do people really do that? I can't stand big, or any, logo on my clothing to be honest. I'd rather be solid colors or prints with better quality fabric than a specific brand. IDK if it's the ADHD or the autism, but I hate logos on clothes.

The only "apparel" item I have with branding I have is a backpack with a Supreme look alike fake logo that just says Pretentious.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 59 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Do people really do that?

My dude, all fancy, expensive brand have their logo plaster on their product. Uniqlo sell BRAND printed on their shirt, depend on who they work with at the time. People also wear shirt with band or pop culture printed on it as well. People pay premium price for bags like chanel or lv just for that logo. Ford have their stupid name displayed in ultra large size on their stupid truck front grille. It's all brand ads.

[–] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Uniqlo is not luxury tho? I have some of their air up shirts without logos and they weren't expensive afair

[–] amotio@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

All the "luxury" clothes with big logos are low tier variants and the really luxury ones have more decent design.

At least that's what I've heard, I don't buy "luxury" brands, I like my clothes clean and brand free.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 11 points 3 months ago

I wear band t-shirts, but I feel like wearing a T-shirt the bassist handed to you at a show is s different category

[–] arken@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

IDK if it's the ADHD or the autism, but I hate logos on clothes.

It's neither; you are just a person of some integrity and intelligence. Nothing wrong with paying more for quality and durability, but if you're paying more to be a walking ad, well... let's just say it's not flattering look. (I get that not everyone are sensitive to these things though, and that unbranded clothes are hard to find.)

I refuse to buy anything with a visible brand - I even remove the neck and washing labels inside of garments. When I bought it, it's mine, it's not [brand name]s anymore. Sneakers and similar shoes are harder to find unbranded, sometimes you can remove sown-on labels, sometimes I even tape over labels with black tape.

It actually makes wearing the clothes a much better experience as well. Instead of thinking that I'm wearing a shirt from [expensive brand], I see the shirt for what it is.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not sure how it could possibly be related to ADHD.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 106 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If your luxury brand has a giant logo you are purchasing regular goods at an increased price.

Actual luxury brand items are typically not heavily branded.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I've got some old polo shirts from my dad's closet that I still wear. The material is sturdy, easy to clean, and doesn't noticeably fade over time. Tiny little logo on the breast, but it's this shade of blue I swear you can't find in stores anymore. Looks good, fits good, feels good on my skin. This shirt is easily 20 years old.

I got to the store to buy a new polo and the logo is practically across my chest. The stitching is already fraying. Fades after the first wash. Paper thin and easily torn. It'll be in the rag pile inside two years.

They really don't make'm like they used to

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 50 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This pisses me off so hard, I refuse to buy apparel that has anything more than a logo on it. I am giving you my money for your design, I'm not paying you to be a walking billboard I'm paying you to have clothing on my body. It's becoming increasingly harder nowadays to buy clothing that doesn't have a quarter of the item taken up by some sort of brand name on it it's ugly as shit and annoying

I've recently had to forgo my favorite style because you can no longer find it without having it plastered with brand or logo, it's just a simple pair of sweatpants with a racing stripe down the side it does not need a brand name that takes quarter of the leg

[–] JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If you like nice shirts with no design or logo, Kohl's has some really comfortable shirts in several colors and no logo at all. They're some of my favorite shirts right now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The cheaper the item, the bigger the brand.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 38 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Store brand tshirts from places like C&A are often entirely plain, meanwhile expensive brands like Gucci are all about plastering their logo everywhere. I'd be surprised if Gucci shirts actually had lower production costs than C&A shirts.

[–] dynamic_generals@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There’s a difference between consumer luxury goods and actual luxury goods which are typically unbranded and bespoke.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 10 points 3 months ago

My rule of thumb is, if I've heard of it (outside of my niches), it's not actually a high end brand

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even brands like gucci and their line up, their entry level will have bigger brand logos, because they know people who buy entry level gucci are people who want to show the world they have gucci. Real rich people will buy something more cleaner looking.

[–] 1stQ@feddit.org 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like rich people are paying to get the ads removed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Me in my fancy Kirkland Signature t-shirt:

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

An individual with refinement and culture

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Dude at least pick a cool brand that has unique designs and art for each shirt like O'Neil, quicksilver, Roxy etc. Fuck I think even Hollister and clones had cite branded shirts.

Now it's a red box that says Supreme. And apparently is lucrative because their website is closed? I'm too stoned for this shit

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 22 points 3 months ago

I work in a sportswear store and only buy things that are on sale so I get heavy discounts on Nike, Adidas, Puma, New Balance, etc.

These brands are pretty much ubiquitous anyway so I'm not particularly bothered about wearing their products. One thing is for sure though, I won't go around telling everyone how great big corporation is.

Certainly can't argue with the comic!

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's is truly fucked up how corporations figured out how to sell their own ads.

Time to mention Bill Hicks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHEOGrkhDp0

edit: wow, turning an image into a hyperlink is silly in Markdown

[–] mihnt@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ironic how that video is blocked in the US due to copyright.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

The obvious difference is, someone, somewhere out there will see you wearing/using that luxury brand and think "ooo, fancy", and thus will think you are more "refined" for it. Whether you agree with that or not, that's the reality.

nobody is going to think you're more refined for watching a YouTube ad.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Someone will think you're more refined if you don't watch a YouTube ad though, whether it's through ad blocker or premium, that's the comparison you should be making.

[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

True, but I do get irrationally mad if someone else wants to show me something and there are several ads before it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Be the ad you want to see in the world

[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 12 points 3 months ago

laughs in my white Kanye t-shirt.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You got me I pay to be an ad for a co-op i volunteer at

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

they pay me $13 an hour to be a walking Publix ad 😔

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I had to ask my mom to kindly not buy me Aeropostale, or other brands that are in your face and ugly like this. I don't even like those brands. I have always been the jeans and band t shirt guy, or just a plain tee. I'm 40 by the way but moms never stop buying us shirts.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My mother once convinced me to accept a Fender T-shirt from her (I'm more of an Ibanez guy, but still better than Gibson), otherwise unless people pay me I won't wear an "advertisement" T-shirt.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I don't mind wearing shirts with brands on em, just not clothing brands. I love wearing tshirts with old company logos or weird stuff like froot loops or a vintage coca cola shirt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›