this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
260 points (95.5% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2237 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bonifratz@lemm.ee 208 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Trump suggested that restraint would be unfair since his Democratic critics are “getting personal all night long.”

This shows why it was paramount that the Democrats left the "high road". Trump has no clue how to react when someone finally hits back at the bully.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 103 points 3 months ago

Baiting Trump to keep doing the thing that his voters are starting to hate because he can't shut his damn mouth is so funny I'm actually surprised the dems are doing it.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 81 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Seriously. When did "don't fight back" ever work against a bully?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 months ago (6 children)

It's all about principles and turning the other butt cheek like good people do, as if that was going to convince the bully that their way is wrong...

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 42 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It's not about convincing Trump, it's about getting the Independents to vote.

Dems won with Biden in 2020, so they figured that he'd be fine in 2024.

If something worked for a long time, people are reluctant to try something new.

I myself was leery of Biden dropping out, and I was shocked by the Kamala surge.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I hear ya. Turning the other cheek is important. But God also killed Jobs family.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm not sure that idiom is what you think it is.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's proper manners to sneak a cheek when you fart in public

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Makes me think the person that made up that rule was a bully themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] suction@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Also he will never be able to turn the tables and take the high road because he’s trash. Trash with enough money to impress Americans, but he’ll never be able to speak or act like a truly classy person.

[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 79 points 3 months ago (4 children)

He doesn't know who his opponent is, but he hates them.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 3 months ago

I'm still convinced he can't tell the difference between Kamala Harris and Nikki Haley

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

This, but unironically.

Trump is a toddler who never gets told no. He instinctively and compulsively hates anyone who opposes him, because they had the audacity to stand between him and something he wants. There's no deeper thought to it than that.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

Everyone but Dump has always known: his opponent is him.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Reading what he said in the article, that's pretty close to the truth. He wasn't saying that he hates Harris particularly, but that whomever his opponent is, he hates that person and he's going to be mean.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Of course Trump hates her. She's Black.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He’s also being walloped by a woman.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Thats probably why he hates it so much, being beaten by a woman is very much not his thing. If a woman's gonna do anything to him, he'd prefer something a little warmer, perhaps also golden even.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Now now. Trump hates people of every complexion.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

We knew he was a crybaby before, but outright proving he's a crybaby is weird

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Boy those articles about a "new Trump" aged like milk on a Phoenix sidewalk huh?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

About as well as all the many, many, many times the "liberal media" kept talking about how "Presidential" donnie was acting after he held in the crazy for 30 seconds that one time, and how he was going to "pivot" into the role, and so on.

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 31 points 3 months ago

I'm not even American and I'm keen to see what the debate will be like. I seriously doubt Trump has enough self-control to stop himself lashing out at Harris, let alone the presence of mind to listen to his advisers!

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

Good, good. We hate you too, but we’re not mentally defective.

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Shut the fuck up, nobody likes you. Nobody wants you. At least, nobody that matters. Read the god damn room.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He's so old, desperate and weird.... he's 100% going to call her that word that starts with C on stage at the debate and break another bigot republican glass ceiling.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

C, N or B. Maybe even a combination thereof!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fin@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You called me weird. I hate you.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 months ago (4 children)

it's hard to imagine someone over five being that sensitive and fragile

[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“When I look at myself in the first grade and I look at myself now, I’m basically the same. The temperament is not that different.” -Donald Trump https://www.cnn.com/2016/03/04/opinions/president-trump-six-year-old-with-nuclear-weapons-dantonio/index.html

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

How in the fuck does even the stupidest, most un-selfaware person on earth think that that line is somehow a flex.

Donnie...buddy...bubbala...being the same person you were at five is not something to admit to. It's a sign of a deep psychological short-circuit in how your fucking brain works...

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You've had several years with non-stop coverage of this specific exemplar (and decades of consistent wtf before that) to practice with, but it's still hard to imagine? 🤪

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i hope i never get to a point where i just accept that this is just something that happens

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

I'm with ya there, 100%, no contest. I was merely being glib about "hard to imagine". 🙇🏽‍♂️ In actuality, if the last several years were described to past me as the upcoming timeline, I would've genuinely asked that narrator if they were fuckin' high. 😵‍💫

[–] fin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Was he over 5? That’s why he looks so old.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

That's been donnie since at least the 80s - all in the public eye.

[–] ArugulaZ@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 months ago

Do you even know who your opponent is? Do you know what day it is? Point to the cow in this picture. No, that's a horse.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Goddamn he is so fuckin' old.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Of course he does. He's full of hate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

That's alright bias fact checker. The biologicals can suss this one out... True. Great share, OP, thanks!

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

He really hated Obama, but now there's a real fear that the entire nation will say they like a black woman better than him. And I just don't think he could handle that kind of rejection.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Let him do it. It will hurt him in the polls.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Well yeah, she's too old for his tastes, and much more independent and strong than he thinks women ought to be.

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

Get new material Donald.

Hate is out, hope is in.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

"Whoever they are, doesn't matter, I hate them. If they agree with everything I say, I hate them. If they are my own family, I hate them. Whoever they are, whatever problem that you personally have, it is actually their fault, the way I tell it at least. We actually wrote the "I hate..." statements first, and then we just insert the name eventually. We're making it all up you see, I have to be the president or else I go to jail or russia."

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Let him get mean and personal. So she can be ready and hit him back with "you're a felon and a sexual deviant" over and over. I would love for him to fall apart and call her mean and nasty after she snacks him around.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 3 months ago

Hate. From the T rump? Well I never. Lets look at both sides here though. given all the Disdain, Revulsion, Disgust, Loathing, Contempt, and even pity. Oh I guess theres hate to though.

load more comments
view more: next ›