this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18968 readers
3379 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hunter Biden’s lawyer filed an ethics complaint in the House of Representatives on Friday against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene for reaching a “new level of abhorrent behavior” after she displayed sexually explicit pictures of him during a hearing Wednesday.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bemenaker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Now file charges under DC revenge porn law

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately she's protected by congressional immunity. If only people in power didn't create special rules for themselves.

[–] DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Only when she says it on the floor as a congresswoman. She doesn't have carte blanche to say whatever she wants anywhere else.

And since she sent out his nudes in a mailer, he can sue

[–] Hnazant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then emailed it to non age verified people.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

So, she should be on the sexual offenders list?

[–] coffeekomrade@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s wild how unhinged our society has become in such a short time

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not everybody. just one, particular sector of society.

[–] Dankry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I believe a wise woman once aptly described them as "deplorables."

[–] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Again. What the fuck does Hunter Biden matter, and why is this Scarecrow looking scab insist on wasting our money on this garbage?

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

hunter biden matters to republicans because he's the only thing they can hang on joe biden, who has been honestly masterful in the way he's navigated the late and post-pandemic.

[–] Compactor9679@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea... Who cares of all the money he took? Fucking crack head good for nothing..... Doing coce at the white house... My God

[–] Cranakis@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You need to take another esl class.

Or go back for your GED. Whichever. Fucking moron.

[–] Compactor9679@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

Fucking retard

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This needs to be more than an ethics complaint. This was revenge porn.

[–] Compactor9679@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Hubter doing porn and getting out.... Doing drugs from the crack of a prostitute that he paied with your money... Hahahh

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Alwaysfallingupyup@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is any of what she said correct? And dont give me the "it doesnt matter" bs

[–] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Which time? She keeps saying different things and changing her story.

[–] krzschlss@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One side uses a distraction. It gets full media attention. People get involved. People get angry. People start blaming each other. Then, the other side counters with a distraction. It gets even more heated. This time it's personal. There might even be consequences. Maybe...

Why the fuck are you eating all this rotting shit those out of touch, self-absorbed, greedy, attention-seeking Partisans are serving you?

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they're the people that craft our laws? Why shouldn't we care?

[–] krzschlss@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yea, naked pictures of a politicant are vital to your legal wellbeing.

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And that's how you took that comment?

[–] krzschlss@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not a US citizen. I don't care for your celebrity obsessions and gossip. I just don't understand why shit like this is making news, let alone being part of your political life. Or lawcrafting... Let me remind you, we are not talking about making laws, we are talking about naked pictures of some dude...

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shown in the house floor by one of our representatives.

[–] krzschlss@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yes, and by giving it any kind of attention you're basically promoting this kind of behavior in your political institutions. And then, after few years you wonder why your political landscape is full of reality-tv-show clowns. It's "Keeping up with Kardassians" but with diplomatic immunity. And I'm talking about both of your political spectra, not just the one easy target.

[–] Umbra@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

These pictures... were in the publics interest... to see

[–] BarterClub@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We would like to see yours. For public interest.

[–] Umbra@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

I am lacking in crack cocaine and high class escorts so I can't produce any sadly

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What possible reason would the public need to see Hunter Biden naked? What relevance does it have to anything?

[–] Umbra@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

I was being sarcastic

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just wanted you to know, I knew you were being sarcastic, but I only have one upvote to normalize the situation.

[–] Umbra@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Haha, that's okay

[–] Perrin42@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While she ought to be tossed in jail, she is likely shielded by the Speech & Debate clause.

[–] exohuman@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Taking a private citizens’s nudes and sharing it against their will in congress may go against the spirit of that clause. I would love to see how this holds up in court.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Except he voluntary turned over the laptop with the photos.