this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
148 points (98.7% liked)

Business

378 readers
335 users here now

A place to share business news and insights.


Rules


  1. Follow lemmy.world rules
  2. Only post content related to business
  3. Do not use this community to promote your business

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Well, their business model of selling their stuff with "Tupperware Parties" was en vogue in the 70s, 80s. The world of businesses has changed since then. Tupperware has not. Go figure.

[–] CyberDine@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Another victim of Boston Consulting Group

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is this late-state enshittification? Didn't they super cheap-out on some/all of their products to appeal to the 'single' use crowd?

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

the 'single' use crowd

Oil and plastic producers?

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Gonna need RC here to save them. BCG is cancer.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 38 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

IMHO, they had a weird ass business model that was about selling direct to consumers through local reps and “Tupperware parties.”

Their competitors sold comparable products in stores and online waaaay before Tupperware woke up. And by the time they woke up, people had already had moved on to other brands.

They’re paying the price for dumb decisions made years ago. They basically handed their food container market dominance over to other companies.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Kinda similar to how Kodak went down.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 24 points 16 hours ago

Well, originally, they started in shops but it was failing miserably so they came up with the ~~pyramid scheme~~ Tupperware ambassadors.

But yeah it was a long time ago and they didn't think of changing the model until recently.

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 53 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

...facilitate a sale process for the business in order to protect its iconic brand and further advance Tupperware's transformation into a digital-first, technology-led company.

Wait, what?

[–] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 37 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Haven't you heard of containerization?

[–] Gingernate@programming.dev 11 points 9 hours ago

Next docker competitor, Tupperware

[–] h0rnman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago

Absolute most underrated comment in this thread

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 41 points 17 hours ago

Tupperware is a weird ass company and for the longest time you couldn’t buy their products in a store or online. You had to go to a “Tupperware party” and buy them from a local rep.

Eventually they started to sell in select stores and eventually online.

By “digital first, technology led,” they basically mean they’re playing catchup with e-commerce basics.

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 23 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Virtual food storage containers, now with TupperAI ©

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago

Will it be on the blockchain?

[–] ouRKaoS 4 points 15 hours ago

Official Tupperware© pack now available in The Sims for only $29.99!

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

AI, they probably mean AI.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

People are moving away from plastic containers for food. Cheap disposable Glad and Rubbermaid containers also made a huge dent in their business.

https://www.americastestkitchen.com/articles/7872-why-you-shouldnt-microwave-plastic

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Since PFAS and PFOS is basically in all food container packaging these days, I've switched to using glass containers for everything I can. Pyrex if I can manage it.

[–] Zess@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Rubbermaid makes better tupperware than Tupperware does.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 14 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

On some level their product is too good--sell it once, and that's it. You own it, and it lasts forever.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 35 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Products can break, people are born and grow up an eventually need to buy that kind of thing. Some of it can break or wear out even if most of it last decades.

The problem is expecting never ending exponential growth because of the pressures of capitalism instead of finding a stable level of production and making that profitable. Especially with buy it for life products.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 15 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

This makes room in the market for a company that makes subscription-based plastic containers that steal your data.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

That's a weird way to spell innovation

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

So does trying for exponential growth, or really selling anything at all.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago

IMHO, the bigger issue is that they refused to sell their stuff in stores and on the internet for a long long time. You had to buy from select retailers or a local rep that threw “tupper ware parties.”

A lot of use just moved to other brands that were easier to find, and when we wanted to replace stuff that never got returned by a neighbor, we bought more of the same stuff.

[–] BenM2023@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

The products also have/had a lifetime guarantee - providing you could find a rep and they still made the product... Got a jug replaced after 40 years of hard service.

It's also why the party model failed them - MLM for a product that never broke or wore out.

Newer tupperware was microwave safe.

Reps got a cut of party sales and if they made enough each month the could get other benefits as well (a company car, for example).

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

You've just realized why companies love planned obsolescence.