this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
84 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13541 readers
832 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Fucking finally, but realistically this will become a right wing talking point and ultimately reversed by the next Republican administration

[–] regul@hexbear.net 26 points 2 months ago

Or just NHTSA will get completely ignored in the wake of Chevron.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now they're coming for your SUVs! Can you believe that? It's true! The woke NTSB wants to make it so your truck can't kill whoever it hits! [crowd boos] ooh I know I know! Now what are good honest god fearing people supposed to do when some loony leftist fascist radical blocks the street, protesting, protesting to let Palestine kill more Israelis? You can't run 'em over! But we're gonna change that. Yes we are. SUVs and trucks are going to be MORE dangerous, hell on earth dangerous, GIVE 'EM HELL! [crowd cheering] a-little-trolling

[–] waluigiblunts@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They'll use some tonnage loophole to exempt their murder plow trucks by classing them as commercial vehicles and thereby increasing the size and deadliness as well as reducing fuel economy even more. Three birds with one stone!

agony-deep

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

Minivans being classed as "light trucks", there's precedent tbh.

[–] Rojo27@hexbear.net 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I want to be optimistic about this, but knowing how things are here manufacturers will drag their feet on this and the government will be happy to let them do so.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

I am very unoptimistic. I posted this because what I made my title was in a Bluesky post. At first when I saw it - I couldn't believe it. Then after about five seconds I had to laugh at myself. Recently literally about once a day at Hexbear I've been making fun of how regulations and laws about stuff like food safety are a joke. Why would similar stuff about cars be any different? That would make no sense! In fact - the lack of such testing by the federal government started to make sense to me.

Surely a firm like Volvo has done "outside of vehicles" testing but why would any typical American firm? That would just get in the way of profits. And once they saw a highly profitable market for ginormous obscene vehicles - they had a strong impetus not to test. If you don't test - you get no bad data. It's Trump logic but it works. If they did tests - even secret ones - eventually the public would learn about them and get mad. Also - I'm not a lawyer but there might be legal liability.

Sure - anybody involved in creating those cars could easily see they'd be a total nightmare to pedestrians and in particular to children but why let that gruesome and ugly reality get in the way of fat, juicy profits? Making as much money as possible is as American as it gets.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The quote in context

The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has now taken steps to address that issue, stunning safety advocates with proposed vehicle design rules that the regulatory agency says will help reduce pedestrian deaths.

For the first time ever, manufacturers would be required to study the impact of test dummies hit outside of vehicles. The rules would likely change the design of what America drives permanently.

“We have a crisis of roadway deaths, and it’s even worse among vulnerable road users like pedestrians,” Sophie Shulman, the agency’s deputy administrator, said in a statement announcing the proposed rule last week.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

manufacturers would be required to study the impact of test dummies hit outside of vehicles.

Okay so they're totally just going to say they passed their study with flying colors until they get caught juking the stats resulting in a $10,000 fee.

$10,000 is $10,000 I guess.

[–] Meh@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Damn, that kid got obliterated. Ship it!"

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The Child Killer Vengeance 2024 is gonna sell like hotcakes!

[–] pumpchilienthusiast@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

cool so assuming the nhtsa can actually enact and enforce meaningful improvements we will still only have to deal with today's toddlermasher vehicles on our roads for another 20 years or so

[–] chungusamonugs@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

I'm of the philosophy that anyone with an suv or pickup that isn't associate with a business should be able to pass a class C license test ( newsflash-asshole 90% of them could not) or have their death machine confiscated with zero reimbursement.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 month ago

Don't worry, thanks to planned obsoleted they're going to be out in 10 years or so.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm begging for manufacturers to bring back modern versions of their 90s subcompacts

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Edit I'm not a car guy. It seems the vid is a total lie and probably made with AI. [Redacted]. And I mean it.

---

I googled.

2025 Suzuki X-90 Revealed - 90s SUVs returning to their former glory? - YouTube

From 1995 until 1997, Suzuki produced and sold the X-90, a two-door, two-seater vehicle that could be equipped with front, rear, or four-wheel drive. Instead of the dangerous Samurai, Suzuki introduced the far more secure X-90, which included front and rear airbags as standard equipment. The good news is that the iconic Suzuki X90 from the '90s is making a triumphant return...

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] blame@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

maybe i cant read but the article says theyve made two rules but only talks about one of them. What's the other one?

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

They're reinstating Don't Ask, Don't Tell for car manufacturers to counter the allegations that car manufacturers are woke.