this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
87 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22841 readers
356 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 46 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

When you combine it with plants it's cool as shit. The Barbican district of London:

[–] Eco@hexbear.net 29 points 3 months ago

adding onto this with the alexandra road estate

[–] Gorb@hexbear.net 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Love walking through the barbican it makes me feel so smol, photos don't really do the scale justice those concrete pillars are huge

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago

Yea I don't know what to call it, green brutalism? Eco brutalism? Either way the combo of plants + all that blocky concrete looks so good to me

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 25 points 3 months ago

For me, it's a case-by-case thing. This KFC? Dope as hell. Cybertruck? Looks like shit.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 16 points 3 months ago

If the colonel had an official headquarters where he conducts operations from, that would be it.

[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Concrete is a material where small mistakes can cause lasting damage. Heavy use of concrete in hot climates requires a ton of air conditioning. In cold climates, small mistakes lead to a lot of cracks which makes heating hard. Old Soviet brutalist architecture had a lot of teeny tiny mistakes in the concrete which makes them difficult to live in and expensive to heat and cool.

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Concrete is also hugely polluting from a carbon emissions perspective

3rd largest emission source behind transportation and power gen iirc

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

The good thing is we're working on it. Concrete usage isn't going to slow down any time soon, but adjusting the chemistry to be less polluting or (ideally) carbon neutral would have massive benefits to ecology.

[–] TechnoUnionTypeBeat@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago

Brutalism is peak when it's done with actual care for aesthetics. Concrete can be poured into all sorts of interesting shapes and designs, and with added colour or plants you can get some really interesting building designs

But a lot of brutalism is just Block (tm) which obviously doesn't really work out

[–] Commiejones@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago

border-square This is brutal

mystery-emote border-bottom
border-diagonal-tr-bl border-diagonal-tr-bl This is not brutal
border-top

[–] GarfieldOfficial@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This building looks like how I imagine Fort Knox will after it’s privatized. Col Sanders presents the “Kentucky Fried Chicken Buillon” depository

[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

As far as evil buildings go it looks pretty evil

[–] HumanAnarchist@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago

I hate it. I understand it's occasional necessity (the US needs some commie blocks last century) but I strongly dislike it as an aesthetic. Cities should be beautiful to look at and be in, and brutalism is neither of those things.

[–] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago

It's cool and good, especially with a lot of natural greenery added. Shouldn't be the only style though, and the op pic is dog shit, capitalism ruins everything.

[–] rootsbreadandmakka@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago

I hate it. I know that’s an unpopular opinion here but whatever. Also I’ve seen all the “brutalism done right” examples people trot out when I express this opinion and they still suck.

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago

It can be very good and it can also be pretty bad.

[–] Alisu@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like the aesthetics, but it's boring if it's the only thing. Also, that shit will get way too hot way too fast in summer, put a lot of trees everywhere and we can talk about having brutalist buildings. My gold standard for urbanism is the public universities in Brazil, there are a lot of trees, buildings are mostly well planned, they are entirely walkable, it's like a degree or two colder inside the campus, it's crazy.

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When I lived in Juiz de Fora, the building I was in wasn't air-conditioned but you'd never know it because it was well planned and ended up acting like a giant chimney, funneling all the heat from the day upward, replacing it with cool air from the trees next door. It was like natural air conditioning.

[–] Alisu@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, you can minimize the need for air conditioning, or even completely ignore it if the building is well planned, well built and in an area with sufficient vegetation. The air carries the heat away, and the trees help cool the air too

[–] NoLeftLeftWhereILive@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago

I have lived a big part of my life in Soviet style concrete apartment buildings (khrushchevka) that are brutal architecture inspired afaik. Essentially various kinds of concrete blocks. When they are in the middle of a lot of greenery, trees and parks and the area is a bit older, they are pretty much what a suburb is understood as where I live. If they are kept well and maintained I think they are very cool.

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

very fitting in the grand scheme of captialism

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago
[–] khizuo@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago

I love it. Not all Brutalist buildings are winners, but that’s the case for every architecture style; and when it’s done well it’s some of the most beautiful stuff in the world to me.

[–] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago
[–] wtypstanaccount04@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

Brutalism can look absolutely amazing when paired with plants, and stands pretty decently on its own. Brutalism also does great when next to other architecture so it has a chance to stand out.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

KFC (Kreatively Formed Concrete)

[–] AndJusticeForAll@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

Wish we could get some brutalist design on this god damn website. Square off those corners, admin.

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Tabarnak! I hate that photo

[–] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Horrible when evil commies do it, wonderful and innovative and novel when capitalists copy it wholesale.

[–] wheresmysurplusvalue@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

There's the eastern bloc brutalism, but how about the kind of concrete constructions found in Brazil e.g. Niemeyer?