this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
216 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

16585 readers
4262 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz
fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
216
Equinunerous Sets (mander.xyz)
submitted 10 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (4 children)

consider two sets: set a and set b. both set a and b contain all horses, ane nothing else. they are always equivalent.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but does the set of all sets that don't include themselves include itself?

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Easy. If and only if the integer sequence A053169 contains the number 53169

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Yesn't.

[–] match@pawb.social 6 points 10 months ago

set a contains all horses. set b contains all ponysonas

[–] steventhedev@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Gotcha. So all horses are purple?

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

But how can set b contain all of the horses if they're already in set a???

[–] stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Where can I find that template?

[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

[–] degen@midwest.social 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Obviously there's the overall juxtaposition, but I really like the proportional dampness.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

Does that mean you cannot distinguish between the two?

[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not the same extent and also a jpeg. I'm sorry but I had to go through Instagram photo downloader hell for this

[–] stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

Don't be sorry, I appreciate the effort :)

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I wouldn't trust on category theorists discernment. They are patently bad at it.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 5 points 10 months ago

Category theorists 🤝 Topologists
Unable to distinguish 10 donuts from 10 mugs