this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
466 points (94.6% liked)

News

23387 readers
3326 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am not a teen.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 195 points 1 month ago (12 children)

If it does not serve a purpose for the plot, then it’s not needed. Simple as that.

[–] TwistedTurtle@monero.town 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

As I said here:

Why does it have to further the plot?! Why does sex/nudity have to justify itself when tons of movies have gratuitous action scenes and violence that add nothing to the plot? 90% of John Wick is gratuitous violence that added nothing to the story (but I still love it). Our culture celebrates violence and we’ll watch people get tortured to death without batting an eye - but if some tits show up on screen then suddenly everyone becomes a critic analyzing whether the story REALLY needed it or not.

It’s disturbing to me that we’re culturally encouraged to find fun in violence but sex needs to be cordoned off to a containment genre and excised from mainstream art. I’m not saying it needs to be in every movie - but its been obvious for a while they’re going out of their way to avoid it, even in places where it would make sense or be fun. I want art to stop awkwardly excluding a major part of life. I want out of this “Everyone is beautiful and no one is horny” Twilight Zone multiverse that all our modern movies seem to take place in.

Sex is too important to be left to porn.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 117 points 1 month ago (27 children)

Actual no holds barred sex of every sort you wish to see, as often as you wish to see it, a click away on the interwebz, the titillation found by past generations in R rated movies and late night Television, no longer computes, and is wholly unnecessary

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 35 points 1 month ago

Yea that was my thought too. When I was a teen we had one PC and it was in a shared room. Had to rely on the TV for jerk off material. These days everyone has the whole internet in their pocket. TV is for watching good stories, they can skip the sex scenes.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 105 points 1 month ago (13 children)

I'm not a teen (far from it), but I'm with the kids on this one. The vast majority of sex scenes in movies are awful. They're awkward and totally unrealistic. It completely takes you out of the movie. Most sex scenes are not engrossing or engaging, they don't immerse you in the story, they push you out of it.

Most every sex scene feels like it was made by someone who's never had sex. Every angle is the right angle, every thrust is ecstasy, it's nonsense. It's like someone who thinks the covers of romance novels are depictions of real life.

There are a lot of intimate moments that can be portrayed convincingly enough on film, but sex is rarely one of them. And it's just not necessary. Let the audience infer, let us use our imaginations.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have a friend who's dated a bit but has never really had a boyfriend. I think she gives up too soon because she expects a Hallmark movie where everything's perfect and every kiss is magical.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

C'mon, didn't you wanna see Oppenheimer reach criticality?

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

~~Soft core~~

~~Hard core~~

Demon core

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

I agree, every sex scene looks like something that is not how people have sex. Except for the guy in office space https://youtu.be/JNVqMgCAHmk. That sex was real.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And no one is laughing or having a good time. It's always some serious ass business.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 79 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's the stupid toxic "romance" that I want rid of. It gets so boring and tedious to watch. If it's important to the story, then fine. But otherwise can we just normalize friendship between opposite gendered people without the need for bad relationship drama, jealousy, and normalizing the idea that when someone says no, they're actually just "playing hard to get".

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (18 children)

can we just normalize friendship between opposite gendered people

Great idea. I would love a prominent TV show to have main characters of the opposite sex that are good friends and a romance is never shoehorned into it at any point.

Warehouse 13 got sooooo close.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TwistedTurtle@monero.town 56 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (16 children)

I have strong feelings about this because I miss horny comedies like American Pie, and sexy thrillers like Wild Things. I miss stuff like Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Boogie Nights, Office Space, Eyes Wide Shut, True Lies. They all had sex/nudity in a way that furthered the plot, or was just plain fun. All of the criticisms I see here sadden me:

• "It doesn't further the plot!!!"

It can absolutely be an important part of the story. See the examples above. Look at most of our ancient mythologies. On top of that I pose the question: Why does it have to further the plot?! Why does sex/nudity have to justify itself when tons of movies have gratuitous action scenes and violence that add nothing to the plot? 90% of John Wick is gratuitous violence that added nothing to the story (but I still love it). Our culture celebrates violence and we'll watch people get tortured to death without batting an eye - but if some tits show up on screen then suddenly everyone becomes a critic analyzing whether the story REALLY needed it or not.

• "I don't want to watch that with my kids/parents/coworkers/etc"

I agree. So don't. Some of my favorite movies are raunchy comedies or sexy thrillers that I would never want to watch in polite company. That doesn't mean they shouldn't exist! If art were constrained by what you wanted to display in front of your kids/parents/coworkers then our artistic & cultural landscape would be a much bleaker place.

• "We have easy access to porn, I don't need porn in my movies!"

The fact that you only equate sex/nudity to porn reveals a problem. Kids today can’t associate sex/nudity on a screen as art, or even just fun, anymore - because in their minds sex/nudity is inextricably tied to porn. The reality is sex/nudity can be fun, dramatic, scary, or funny depending on the context. It can have a place in many kinds of stories, and comparing it to porn is like saying "we have war documentaries so we don't need war movies." They are completely different things!!

• "It's usually cringey & not done well."

By that logic you could make arguments against a lot of different genres and classic story elements. I don't like the argument that because media these days sucks at doing something they should avoid it altogether. I think they should just do better. Movies in the 80s and 90s proved it can be done.


It’s disturbing to me that we’re culturally encouraged to find fun in violence but sex needs to be cordoned off to a containment genre and excised from mainstream art. I’m not saying it needs to be in every movie - but its been obvious for a while they’re going out of their way to avoid it, even in places where it would make sense or be fun. I want art to stop awkwardly excluding a major part of life. I want out of this "Everyone is beautiful and no one is horny" Twilight Zone multiverse that all our modern movies seem to take place in.

Sex is too important to be left to porn.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 month ago

If there's a 1 minute sex scene in a 90 minute movie, you're guaranteed to have your parents walk in during that one sex scene.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 55 points 1 month ago

Watching softcore porn with your friends and family is kind of undesirable.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 54 points 1 month ago (19 children)

I can't think of a single sex scene in a movie that added value to it. They're pointless and akward to both the audience and actors.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Other poster had a ~~good~~ only example.

Team America world police

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Any art house film trying to portray reality.

Basic instinct interview

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 44 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Most of the (supposed) younger generation people I interact with online seem even more prudish and conservative about sex than my very religious parents were growing up. It's super weird to be the older person who's ok with sexual content. I don't really get it.

And yes, I know people will claim it's because it's only when it's not done right or when it feels shoved in, but honestly from the way they talk about anything dealing with sex, it feels like that's just an acceptable excuse and they really just don't want the content to exist at all, even if 'done right'. It's like a huge chunk of the generation is asexual or something.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] figaro@lemdro.id 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well yeah, I think this is universal. No one wants to watch a sex scene with their parents

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not jusr sex. Most romance can be deleted from series and movies and they would not lose any plot. It is virtually always shoehorned in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The issue isn't sex itself. It's putting a sex scene in most movies meant for adult audiences. Imagine if there had to be a shootout or extended martial arts fight in every romance movie or Hollywood just wouldn't fund it.

Use it where it makes sense, and leave it in the tool box when it doesn't.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's fucking crazy to me that this is a hot take these days. I just want movies to be good. Throwing unnecessary sex scenes into a movie to drive ratings up usually does not achieve that.

Edit: And by unnecessary, I don't even mean just not plot relevant. Only that they should add to, not detract from, the characterization, tone, or plot/story. Fucking loved Challengers (check it out, it's great) and that had a sex scene like every 5 minutes. I just wanna watch some good fucking movies. If I wanted to watch good fucking-movies, I'd just find those online.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Lol, If someone puts a gun against my head and says guess the most lied about thing in human history, honest to god I would say, Teens lying About sex.

For some reason I question the validity of this study.

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (10 children)

There is porn now. Everyfuckingwhere. For free. So much porn. Niche porn. Hardcore porn. Fetish porn. You don't have to jerk off to a lingirie catalog like we did when we were kids. Or sneak National Geographic magazines to see boobs. Sex in movies is just sad, stupid, and often unnecessary tittilation.

It's this.

I remember walking to the video rental store in the 90s to hire VCR tapes. We always tried to get that ones rated 18+ because there would be some boob stuff. Usually the attendant wouldn't care.

Now, fuck. Filtering porn out of my social media feeds is a daily ordeal.

[–] Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

Yeah "sex sells" only works when society is not constantly exposed to more extreme content.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Shou@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Dunno. There are better sources too look for sex. Watching a movie with your mates is just awkward.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

The kids are right.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Team America World Police is the only movie that ever got the sex scene right.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have argued this a bunch of times at this point, but movies should choose a target demographic and then go for it:

  • Make family friendly movies without awkward implied sex under covers or while wearing underwear and such nonsense. Something that I can watch with family without it getting awkward

OR

  • make adult, explicit movies where the actors are actually, explicitly, visibly fucking during sex scenes. Doesnt have to be straight up porn, just make sex scenes sex scenes.

TLDR: Make actual family friendly movies without, and actually adult and explicit movies with. The middle of the road stuff makes it awkward and/or unsatisfying for everyone present

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sex scenes peaked when Tommy Wiseau passionately made love to a belly button and you can't tell me differently.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

21, century of the fantasy, watch out antique civilisations!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The number of sex scenes are down since 2000 of the movies coming out of Hollywood. But if you're willing to read subtitles, there's still a lot of horny videos coming out of Western Europe.

For me, make the sex relevant to the plot and make the sex they have congruent with the characters.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have noticed over the years sex scenes usually add no value to the movie. If the sex scene was removed completely it wouldn’t change the story at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sex, going to the bathroom, and puking.

All 3 can be easily inferred without actually showing it.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: showing the sex and the puking in graphic detail in Team America were both important parts of the movie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I remember watching the wolf of wall street on opening day with my parents when I was a teen.

Based on that experience, I agree, that was so awkward lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (22 children)

My issue is that it's almost always gratuitous now. I so rarely see a sex scene in a TV show or movie and think that it could have easily been skipped, but they felt the need to show an actress' breasts and have her simulate an orgasm.

I don't get titillated by it. I have porn if I need that.

I didn't get past the first episode of Game of Thrones because I found all the sex and nudity too gratuitous for my tastes.

I don't think I'm a prude. I have no problem with sex scenes and nudity in films where they make sense. Basic Instinct wouldn't make sense without them. Last Tango in Paris wouldn't make sense without them. They're both movies worth watching.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's because kids are staying home with mom and dad much later and you know how uncomfortable everyone in the room gets when there's a bang scene.

*The preceding statement was a joke, albeit a bad one. Any similarities to true events are purely coincidental and the author bears no responsibility for any implied or actual hurt feelings.

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I would have watched game of thrones without the porn.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I legit can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, because it perfectly encapsulates the weird way america is so blase about depictions of graphic, gleeful violence while simultaneously being horrified at seeing a nipple.on tv.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

What you didn't want to see a dude fuck his sister, a dude rape a teenager, or a little dude fuck a bunch of prostitutes?

For all the time GRRM spends describing sex, he really goes out of his way to make it as fucked up as possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›