this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
123 points (98.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers
768 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

That's the real issue this time," he said. "Beating Nixon. It's hard to even guess how much damage those bastards will do if they get in for another four years."

The argument was familiar, I had even made it myself, here and there, but I was beginning to sense something very depressing about it. How many more of these goddamn elections are we going to have to write off as lame, but "regrettably necessary" holding actions? And how many more of these stinking double-downer sideshows will we have to go through before we can get ourselves straight enough to put together some kind of national election that will give me and the at least 20 million people I tend to agree with a chance to vote for something, instead of always being faced with that old familiar choice between the lesser of two evils?

Now with another one of these big bogus showdowns looming down on us, I can already pick up the stench of another bummer. I understand, along with a lot of other people, that the big thing this year is Beating Nixon. But that was also the big thing, as I recall, twelve years ago in 1960 – and as far as I can tell, we've gone from bad to worse to rotten since then, and the outlook is for more of the same.

—Hunter S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail '72

When will we move on?

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 69 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] REgon@hexbear.net 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Lmao they were psychic

But actually, who were the democrats they were talking of back then?

[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 39 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

They were talking about the German petty bourgeoisie who they thought would betray the revolutionary proletariat once a bourgeois republic was established. 70 years later the Social Democrats put down the proletarian revolution in Germany to protect the Weimar Republic, inaugurating the reaction in Germany.

[–] REgon@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

70 years later the Social Democrats put down the proletarian revolution in Germany to protect the Weimar Republic, inaugurating the reaction in Germany.

Yeah I've just learned the details of the spartacist uprising sadness
I just was not aware that the SPD were around during Marx and that they were referred to as "democrats"

[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually, some of the people this address was given to would go on to create the SPD and Marx and Engels would support them. The SPD, though it contained a conservative wing, would remain the party of the German proletariat until it split over supporting the first World War and the Bolsheviks in Russia.

I'm not sure what specific names the German petty bourgeois were organizing under in 1850 but at the end of the Communist Manifesto they discuss a number of trends in German politics that would include the petty bourgeoisie.

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

I swear I saw a comment on german lemmy about how ebin antifascist SPD was fighting both nazis and tankies 🤮🤮🤮🤮

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's called immortal science for a reason.

[–] REgon@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

I just thought that was related to Immortal Technique

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 38 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Looking at all the music, media, articles, debates, theory, from 10 or 30 or 60 or 100 years ago that's still perfectly relevant, sometimes so on the nose you don't even have to change the names or update the lyrics, you could just sing it on tiktok and tell people you wrote it, it makes me feel some kind of war.

[–] REgon@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I use this quote a lot, not because I'm a big HST fan, but because it's just so fitting. The fact that even back then the argument was tired... It's maddening.

lyrics, you could just sing it on tiktok and tell people you wrote it, it makes me feel some kind of war.

"Love me, I'm a liberal" might need a few tweaks, but it's almost there.
"Buy a gun for your son" is already perfect.
"Napalm sticks to kids" is sadly still much too relevant.

I'd love to get recommendations for other articles, etc. that are still relevant!

[–] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

I've considered learning "Love me I'm a Liberal", but I'm far from living alone and that's a rough song for someone to walk by at the wrong time. Even in more modernized versions.

[–] frosty99c@midwest.social 15 points 3 weeks ago

I recently re read The Jungle and it is still super relevant. I just read Huasipongo for the first time last week - an oppressed/abused population lashes out against the owner/settler class because they have no other option, and the military is immediately called in to wipe them out. It's all familiar. And those were both written over 100 years ago

[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 32 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I hear the old political saw, that "we must take the least of two evils." My friend from Ohio [Mr. Giddings] has already riddled this excuse, so that I might well leave it untouched; but I cannot forbear a brief observation. It is admitted, then, that Cass and Taylor both are evils. For myself, if two evils are presented to me, I will take neither.

Abolitionist Charles Sumner, 1848 speech, on refusing to vote for a slaveowner

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

rust-darkness Time is a flat circle

[–] M68040@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

They say now's not the time to talk about this stuff, but one of the big recurring things i've had to contend with in terms of personal issues is that there's never a "better time". That magical point where there's nothing else to consider will never arrive, and the longer you wait to rip the band-aid off, the worse it'll get.

[–] Edie@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

https://letterfromjail.com/

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

I find myself quoting/posting this more often than I should have to. It was especially bad after George Floyd was murdered.

[–] REgon@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There is precisely 3 days where it is the time between now and midterms. These days are decreed by the high priests on the eve before they occur.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] miz@hexbear.net 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Edie@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Since I was twenty-one in 1889, I have in theory followed the voting plan strongly advocated by Sidney Lens in The Nation of August 4, i.e., voting for a third party even when its chances were hopeless, if the main parties were unsatisfactory; or, in absence of a third choice, voting for the lesser of two evils

It goes back to 1776 doesn't it?

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago