344
submitted 11 months ago by btaf45@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 69 points 11 months ago

Seriously though, Trump is conning his supporters but there can be a case made that doing so in such bad faith could lead to a lawsuit. Everyone who donated to his campaign can join a class action lawsuit to get their money back.

[-] Nomecks@kbin.social 31 points 11 months ago

Yeah, good luck suing the bankrupt campaign.

[-] LegendofDragoon@kbin.social 22 points 11 months ago

Good luck getting the marks to do anything that might hurt Trump Daddy

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

They can liquidate his assets.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I doubt the campaign actually has any assets. They're probably all leased from Not The Trump Campaign, LLC, which will probably long since have gone out of business by the time there's any judgement.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

I don't think that most of them would believe he lied to them if he told them to their faces. They'd come up with some brain bender about how he'd been blackmailed by the Deep State and was only saying ti to say some child in Iowa...

[-] cassetti@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Correct, because admitting that he's lied to them would rupture the very foundation of their beliefs. If he lied about that, what else has he lied about?

Instead they believe it's all a conspiracy. And that gives them power because it makes them feel "privileged" to know the "truth" as they want to believe it.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

not if each of them would do it again!

[-] iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

As they have... repeatedly and ad nauseam.

Edit: I remember, a few years ago, there was an infomercial for like a coin collection made featuring him and I think even a chess set. Everybody is capitalizing on that cult of personality.

[-] cassetti@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ever heard of "Trump Bucks"? People are literally paying real money with the belief that these are legal tender or will be in the near future. Retail workers have to deal with people trying to buy stuff with these fake bucks all the time and then argue with the employee when told it's not real money

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

I had not heard that, and it's freaking hilarious!

[-] cassetti@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

The more time that passes, the more I believe that the 2006 movie Idiocracy is absolutely a prophecy about the near future of our country.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It's lawsuits all the way down

[-] seSvxR3ull7LHaEZFIjM@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

I doubt any of them would sue him if they still donate to him at this point.

[-] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

Trump supporters are happy to donate to his defense. They truly believe he's innocent, the election was stolen from him, and he's their hero and savior who will reestablish justice.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

I always love to inform them that he was a lifetime card carrying democrat prior to 2016.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

"He only did that because he was in New York City and had to make deals with the dirty pols there?"

Why didn't me move to a town the Dems didn't control?

"Why do you hate America?"

[-] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Anyone who believes his lies at this point is a full-blown cultist and is beyond hope

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

Remember that scene in 'Aliens' where the corporate guy gets eaten?

[-] cunning_bolt@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

I will gladly watch a big chunk of GOP donor money go into his pocket.

[-] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

I think that goes without saying. The court case is nonstop free press for Trump leading up to the election, and unfortunately would probably net him some undecided votes if he wins it. It's basically just 24/7 advertising to his base.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 11 months ago

I fear we're seeing a repeat of 2016 in that regard. I wish the media would just stop talking about him until there's a verdict.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump did not have 6 court cases against him in 2016. He has already been found guilty of sexual assault by a jury but the Nazi affiliated media didn't report it.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

The court case is nonstop free press for Trump leading up to the election

More nonstop bad press for Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump.

and unfortunately would probably net him some undecided votes if he wins it.

Pretty doubtful. He has about 6 active court cases. Ridiculous to spin that as a good thing. He is not only going to be losing he is going to prison.

It’s basically just 24/7 advertising to his base.

Those idiots are already idiots. Imagine how depressing it will be on election day to vote for a candidate who is sitting in prison.

[-] jayrhacker@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

The court case is nonstop free press for Trump leading up to the election

Owning the press cycle is the Drumph Campaigns super power, just keep getting onto the front page and make sure you spell the name right…

[-] Plagiatus@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

He is not only going to be losing he is going to prison.

I believe it when it happens. Not yet.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

It's crazy. I think every rational person in the US knows that trump should be in jail for a long, long time. But there is zero chance of him going to jail. At best (which would still be something given my lack of expectations) he'll end up on house arrest. Which he'll violate and nothing will happen.

[-] Plagiatus@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I'd be grateful for a "can't be president anymore" for starters. Though I would prefer to also see him rot in jail for the rest of his life. Then again, even if he'll probably go to some cushy high profile jail.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

If it’s just on the merits, he can’t win it.

The entire process of them asking for documents back is heavily documented, and at the point you’ve got FBI agents with a warrant walking out with classified documents…. As incontrovertible proof he lied about not having them and was actively refusing to return them.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

It can do two things at once, it is bankrolled his defense and also trying to win election. Particularly since he would be shielded from prosecution while in office.

This is like writing an article titled "New signs campaign is designed to raise money" like yes it is doing that, but you're just deciding that's the main thing the campaign is doing.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

The article does say "partially" in the body, just not the title so they are acknowledging that it's both. But this is of course very old news, he's been doing it since his first campaign. Still, it's probably good to reiterate it as he does it further and for people who don't pay as much attention.

[-] vin@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 11 months ago

Democrats playing 4D chess to divert money from campaign?

[-] UnknownQuantity@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

You're funny!

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
344 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18073 readers
3556 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS