this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
521 points (98.2% liked)

Memes

45898 readers
1247 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 194 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This shit is absolutely atrocious and shows how far we've fallen.

Microsoft almost got broken up as a company over simply BUNDLING a browser. Now they're actively hijacking other installs to put big warnings up and redirecting to theirs. It's absolutely bonkers this is allowed.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Is this a real screenshot or just an out of context meme? I've never seen this prompt when installing other browsers on any of my PCs running Windows 10 over the last 7+ years of it being out.

Edit: It seems to be real. That is craziness. I also realized that all my licenses are Professional or Enterprise (those only on my work-issued devices), so I'm assuming that's why I've never seen it. Like the other comment pointed out, they had their feet put to the fire over simply bundling Internet Explorer in the late 90s, yet nowadays they get away with this shit.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes I've seen it before. Once Microsoft even updated their virus definitions to auto-delete the chrome installer when downloaded. Thankfully they reversed that one pretty quickly, but I had to completely disable all Windows virus protection to install chrome for a relative.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wondered why Chrome wasn’t “Microsoft verified“ anyway. Do they mean it’s not from their store?

Found someone’s screenshot in response to “How to install apps that are not Microsoft-verified”:

So I’m guessing they’re punishing those who don’t distribute through their store. (Where I wouldn’t be surprised they offered fewer features)

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Many new PCs (generally the cheaper priced ones) come in S mode now, where you can only install Microsoft store apps. You can turn this off to allow regular PC programs too, but they require you to set up the Microsoft store before you can disable it.

If you're trying to set up a new PC without a Microsoft account (which is getting increasingly hard), you can't disable S mode. There was a workaround that involved booting into recovery mode and running some commands/registry edits, but I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft has blocked that too by now.

This is also the biggest reason Valve supports Linux and ChromeOS. Microsoft really wants full control over what software people can use on Windows, and Valve is worried about getting pushed off the platform.

[–] Mushroomm@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And they actually wonder why tech literate people shit all over them every chance they get. This is some trash human behavior.

It'd be like if you sprayed fart spray all over your neighbors table at a flea market because they also have a few pokemon cards for sale but they're in better condition than yours.

"Rather than improve myself I'm going to block others from doing better than me" is the corporate worlds motto ATM. Race to the bottom

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Ive given Edge a shot before and it was pretty decent. Sucks for M$ this is how they behave when people don't chose them.

[–] Lyricism6055@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

When they first went to chromium it was decent. Then every update since they add more bloatware and popups saying to add their tracker so you can get discounts and shit.

Uninstalled windows and swapped to Firefox. Now I don't deal with any of that

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 106 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Y'all are installing malware to replace malware.

Firefox all the way!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

To be fair, non-malware OSs come with Firefox preinstalled.

[–] Stomata@buddyverse.one 7 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 88 points 1 month ago (3 children)

the chad "sudo apt install firefox" vs the virgin "noo dont install a different browser,use edge"

[–] tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 month ago

Ah damn, it’s the Ubuntu snap version.

sudo apt install firefox-esr
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 85 points 1 month ago

Microsoft.

MICROSOFT.

NOBODY IS GOING TO LISTEN TO YOUR "HEY MAYBE THIS IS A VIRUS" WARNING IF YOU HAVE TO CLICK THROUGH IT TO INSTALL CHROME.

[–] bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bro.... the demonification of non-manifacturer software has GOT to stop. On huawei its even worse, enabling third party installing forces you thru like three screens and u have to wait 10 FKN SECONDS before u can click thru each..

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

The very, VERY WORST thing about macOS Sequoia is how cunty they’ve become over software downloaded from the internet.

Downloaded an update for Freetube yesterday. Dragged it into the Apps folder, tried to open it.

“Nah bruv. Put it in the bin” said macOS. No other options. Ignore, or trash it.

I’m a canny user, so I know that I now have to open the Security settings and click a button to say I’m happy to use the app.

Return to the app to open it.

“Nah bruv. Put it in the bin. Or open it if you’re stupid. Whatever”

Only then will it open.

Some software, usually stuff downloaded from GitHub, requires me to run a command in Terminal before it’ll run. Tried to install Librewolf via Brew the other day, and had to use Terminal to remove and replace the signature because Finder couldn’t even recognise it as a usable app.

Stupid shit.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Don't forget that macOS literally contacts Apple server for every binary you execute. When there was an issue with those servers, only Apple software was launchable.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25074959

[–] LogicalAIs@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You’re telling me, maaan— they’ve been so up in their feelings lately. I bought a Mac OS X (old as fuck, I know) from some guy on Facebook and when I got home I reset it and set it up. Then Mac like —you can’t update this Model because *. Like— bruh… You won’t let me update this dinosaur to 2019? They have the ability because it is within its compatibility but they just don’t do it. It’ll start “Installing…” then it never starts or finishes. It just wastes my Internet running forever moving files back and forth forever then says “Update not allows for Mac OS X” like —WHAT THE FUCK?! How you going to act like I can update, then just give an error after a billion years wasting my internet then be like “Update not supported” or some shit? 🤦‍♂️ All these companies are freaking stupid.

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you’re trying to install a newer version of macOS than your Mac will allow, then Opencore Legacy Patcher is your friend.

[–] LogicalAIs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Thank you so much for that! I’ll try it as soon as possible. I’m stuck on, I think it’s the MacOS X 10.1.

[–] horse@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

It seems like it's still possible to disable Gatekeeper on macOS 15: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255759797

I haven't tried it though. It's so rare that I want to run something unsigned, I prefer leaving it enabled and then allowing whatever it is I want to run.

[–] bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You seem like a good dude so i woukdnt wanna poke fun at your choices, but why even use macos😭 is linux on mac not usable enough yet or do u just use mac cus u happen to have one

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ve used Macs since 2007, when Apple weren’t quite so shitty, and macOS wasn’t so irritating. I’d only ever used Windows until that point, so Linux wasn’t anywhere on my radar.

Linux on Intel Macs is solid. I have Mint on my old 2011 MacBook. Linux on M-series Macs is still, by all accounts, a work in progress. I’ve dipped my toes into Asahi, but I’d not really fucked with Linux at that point so got a bit overwhelmed and couldn’t work out whether the issues I was having were because of Linux in general, or because Asahi was still being smoothed out and optimised. But now I’m quite a bit more familiar with Linux, and have just been given an M1 mini so I’m going to dig back into it. If that works out for me, I’m going to do the same on my M2 MacBook.

[–] bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Fair enough, the fact people go so far to make the thing run on such a wide variety of hardware is incredible to me. Shoutout to the community fr

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It just seems like Microsoft desperately trying to get anyone to use Edge lol

I wouldn't be surprised if you clicked "install anyway" and another warning popped up that said "Please just use Edge? Just try it for a little bit? Pretty please? We'll be your best friend if you do"

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

IIRC, people have previously reported that Windows 11(?) switched their default browser back to Edge after installing an update.

[–] Takios@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 month ago

That's been going on since 10 already at least.

[–] PeroBasta@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hate them both and use neither. But probably I would use edge over chrome if I had to choose

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

They're the same, and one requires you to jump though hoops to install. OTOH Edge has rounded corners on the viewport which is weird as shit. And that dumb side bar...

[–] Ack@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well send Balmer to your house with a box of cookies! (Disclaimer: box may be empty depending on length of trip)

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

ballmer retired from microsoft over ten years ago.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Tim Microsoft?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mathias_freire@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My memory might be weak on this topic but Microsoft has already went through a lawsuit due to not allowing people to use other browsers. And that case made Bill Gates lose money.

Might be this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.?wprov=sfla1

[–] LogicalAIs@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Also, not trying to be smart or anything but Microsoft isn’t run by Bill Gates anymore. All these shady things started happening after he left. I think he allowed the Company to buy him out because he was getting too old. I’m not really sure on why he did/allowed that.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satya_Nadella

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 month ago

All these shady things started happening after he left.

Not really, they have a history of this kind of thing. They just calmed down a little between roughly 2005 and 2015.

The big antitrust case when they killed Netscape was in 1998. Bill Gate's deposition from that case is kind of interesting to watch as a historical document. It's on youtube here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL90W55zhFBOuZuhgxBsjpgDy0o3ll1PSz

In that lawsuit their "Embrace Extend Extinguish" strategy in which they tried to smother open standards became public too.

They tried with Java and their J++ language too, but failed luckily. And lost a lawsuit against Sun on the way.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Plenty of shady monopolistic things happened under Gates as well. The original Explorer antitrust lawsuit dates from the late 90s, the ACPI debacle, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Huschke@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

These lawsuits take a long time and cost a fraction of what it would cost them to not do that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 42 points 1 month ago

Microsoft's malware is just protecting you.

Game recognises game.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 38 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Should be installing Firefox anyway, otherwise why don't you just use Edge, it's also Chromium...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rolling_resistance@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Can't decide what's a better meme, this or installing Chrome over Edge 🤔🤔🤔

[–] Lennard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago

Google payed billions in fines for making chrome default on android and now has to ask which browser you want when you setup a device.

Microsoft on the other hand actively hinders the installation of other browsers. This is a huge lawsuit just waiting there.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

Stop, I can only switch to Linux so much

[–] MonkeMischief 9 points 1 month ago

Microsoft knows this has so much power with a certain computer user demographic and I hate it so much. It was the worst, having to teach people to install certain useful software while also directing them to override big scary warnings..."But just this time! Don't do it all the time!"

It made me look shady, it made the software look shady, for no good reason.

...And you just know, sadly they're the same kind of users that will probably repeat that pattern with a suspicious .exe they got in an email.

[–] tequinhu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›