261

OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta today issued a statement in response to Senate Bill 478 (SB 478), a bill that he sponsored, being signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom. Coauthored by Senator Bill Dodd (D-Napa) and Senator Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley), the legislation will prohibit hidden fees (also called ‘junk fees’) in California beginning on July 1, 2024. Hidden fees are fees in which a seller uses an artificially low headline price to attract a customer and usually either discloses additional required fees in smaller print, or reveals additional unavoidable charges later in the buying process.

“Today, California is eliminating hidden fees,” said Attorney General Rob Bonta. “These deceptive fees prevent us from knowing how much we will be charged at the outset. They are bad for consumers and bad for competition. They cost Americans tens of billions of dollars each year. They hit families who are just trying to make ends meet the hardest. And, because a growing list of websites, apps, and brick-and-mortar businesses are using them, they penalize companies that are upfront and transparent with their prices. With the signing of SB 478, California now has the most effective piece of legislation in the nation to tackle this problem. The price Californians see will be the price they pay. I am deeply grateful to Senators Dodd and Skinner, the authors of SB 478, for their commitment to protecting consumers.”

“With the governor’s signing of this historic bill, we can finally take aim at dishonest junk fees that are tacked onto seemingly everything – from online concert tickets to hotel reservations,” said Senator Bill Dodd. “Now we can put the consumer first and create a level playing field for those businesses that advertise the real price, up front. I appreciate everyone who worked to end these dishonest charges that boost corporate profits at the expense of those who can least afford it.”

“California sent a clear message today: The days of bait-and-switch pricing practices are over,” said Senator Nancy Skinner. “With Gov. Newsom’s signing of SB 478, Californians will know up front how much they’re being asked to pay, and no longer be surprised by hidden junk fees when buying a concert or sports ticket or booking hotel rooms for their family vacation.”

After announcing that he was sponsoring SB 478 in February 2023, Attorney General Bonta urged the California Legislature to approve the legislation in March 2023, heeding the call from the Biden-Harris Administration and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for states to better address the nationwide concern of hidden fees. In May 2023, he held a press conference in San Diego to highlight the bill’s importance.

Deceptive price advertising is a significant problem facing consumers that appears to be proliferating in more and more sectors of the economy. Hidden required fees are now charged for a variety of goods and services, such as lodging, tickets for live events, and restaurants and food delivery. These fees, when mandatory, are a deceptive way of hiding the true price of a good or service.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TryingToEscapeTarkov@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago
[-] J12@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

That industry is straight up garbage. My friend wanted to go to a concert so I figured I’d see what the prices are like before I committed to anything. So I check Ticketmaster, Vivid Seats and a couple other. They show you the base price, but won’t give you the actual total until you create an account. So once they get all of your info they finally show you that the price now doubles with all the fees and crap.

Also ticketmaster sells your information.

Good for california, this should be worldwide, these slimy corporations need some strict rules.

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago

All that changed is now they have to tell you precisely how they’re fucking you over.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 months ago

If it didn't negatively affect their bottom line they'd do it already. They only hide the real price because a non-zero portion of people will go through making an account, picking seats, get to the end screen with the real price, and say "fuck it I'm going anyway." If showing the real price upfront drives away even a small percentage of those people it's a huge amount of lost revenue for a company selling millions of tickets.

Which is why the law is a good thing, because you can't count on companies to do the right thing if it doesn't make them money.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

I await the flood of companies complaining about what is clearly an advantage for customers.

[-] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 13 points 8 months ago
[-] nocturne213@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

As a shop owner, yes please.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Booo! They should make all prices work like the US healthcare system where no one has any idea what the price will be at the point of sale and then you get a bill a few months later that’s based on if you have a good job, are a veteran, are old, indigent, etc.

It’ll be great. Instead of Ticketmaster, we’ll all have concert insurance provided by our boss. You get your tickets anytime you want and then a program written in COBOL will decide what you deserve to pay unless Congress has decided to favor you.

[-] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

a program written in COBOL will decide what you deserve to pay

omg lmaooo 🤣

[-] misterharbies@lemmy.nz 3 points 8 months ago

It's this end of tipping culture?

[-] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

That's a good point, I wonder if they'll work that in if it's forced on the bill. I guess they just have to disclose it at the beginning.

[-] littlecolt@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

If I'm reading this right, this means that cable TV companies will have to include the broadcast TV surcharge amount in the quoted price since it is a requirement of having a TV package that includes local stations. Can't wait to see if that's the case. I work in that field and I've always thought it was unfair that it is not disclosed in advertised prices despite having climbed to over $20 for many carriers. Your nice seeming $40 cable bill leaps to over $60 and that is not advertised on the website where you look at pricing.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
261 points (97.5% liked)

politics

18059 readers
3154 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS