this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
373 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2444 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

trumpf: “I’m going to end tax on overtime!”

me: probably just code for ending OT entirely…

today: jc

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You are trying to tell me, that Americans don't get paid for overtime? Not getting paid 3, 2 or at least 0.5 times more, like the civilised world, but nothing? So they are working for free. What's that called again?

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think the rich get overtime pay

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

The rich have their money working overtime.

[–] CritFail@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

I don't wish multiple gout-related limb amputations on many people, buuuut...

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 84 points 1 day ago (2 children)

get used to it, it's only going to get worse from here on out, as if that seems impossible, it isn't. now that trump has been re-elected, there's no surprise this time around, and after he was rightly targeted in criminal probes these last 4 years, he's going to take the gloves off, and come for owners, producers, and journalists of anything he deems disloyal. what we thought we were sure of about the united states and how it should operate is quickly coming to an end. this is what fascism means.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yup.

Fools think there's a magical reset button ever 4-8 years if we regret our decisions.

I implore those fools to pick up a history book and find out why that isn't a guarantee. But we know they never will.

By the end of whatever this is workers in America will have less power and our institutions will be weakened, if not destroyed.

Americans are about to find out what actual suffering is.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 13 points 18 hours ago

protip: no matter where you live, you're about to find out too. no fault of your own, completely our fault, but it's coming sure as night follows day. the inter-connectivity of the worlds only western superpower is about to be made abundantly clear to everyone thinking this is only an American problem.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A depressing take that I 100% share but wish I didn't.

The only way I'm going to be able to deal with this bullshit is to tune out or numb myself to it in some way

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The only way I’m going to be able to deal with this bullshit is to tune out or numb myself to it in some way

Yup.

Ignorance is bliss.

The next 4 years minimum are going to be a non-stop onslaught of depressing and outright embarrassing headlines. I plan on cutting all news pipelines out of my feeds at the end of this calendar year.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Yeah. I understand. I wish I could do that too but realistically I'm probably just going to pay half as much attention as I traditionally have

[–] remer@lemmy.world 112 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s almost as if corporate media is biased towards corporations over workers 🤔

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is why the right (and the Enlightened Centrists (TM) ) get so flummoxed if you ask them just where IS this supposed "liberal media" I hear so much about?

It definitely is not ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, New York Times, Washington Post, NPR, PBS....

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

where IS this supposed "liberal media" I hear so much about?

It definitely is not ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, New York Times, Washington Post, NPR, PBS....

Yeah, it is. Liberal ≠ Left wing

Neoliberalism (which is the kind of liberalism practiced in the US) is a center right to right wing ideology.

Just because something is to the left of literal fascism doesn't mean it's left of center.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Neoliberal ≠ Left wing

FTFY

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world -3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Same difference since today's liberals are Neoliberals.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Neoliberalism is a perversion of liberalism. It is not the evolution and certainly not the natural progression of liberal thought.

It is a excuse looking for a rationalization. An offshoot no normal liberal would approve of. They are like that weird stranger who thinks numbers will fix everything.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The liberties that original liberalism introduced are so basic that they're now taken for granted by all but the extreme Right.

The founding fathers were classic liberals and still most major them owned slaves and none of them would give them up during their own lifetime. While mostly very progressive for their time, they would be considered very conservative today.

You're right about one thing: Neoliberalism IS a perversion of liberalism and it's NOT natural. That doesn't change that it's the kind of liberalism that exists today and that "liberal" and "on the left" are objectively mutually exclusive.

It is a excuse looking for a rationalization. An offshoot no normal liberal would approve of. They are like that weird stranger who thinks numbers will fix everything.

That's how it was in the 80s/late 70s when Neoliberalism was pioneered by the likes of Reagan and Thatcher. Nowadays, both of them would be considered to the Left of most Democrats and yes, all liberals.

You're simply using the false definition of "anyone to the Left of Republicans" that billionaire-owned media have been drilling into your head in support of the false dichotomy of the two party system being absolute.

The biggest right wing party of Australia is called the Liberal Party and guess what? They're not the ones who are confused about what contemporary liberalism is.

Granted, the fact that Neoliberalism is inherently authoritarian, which is by definition illiberal on the other axis DOES add to the confusion, but on the left-right economic axis, Liberals are firmly to the right or they aren't liberals.

You might be thinking of social democrats rather than liberals tbh 🤷

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 12 minutes ago

Liberalism thought leads to concepts like social democracy. I get it is popular to shit on liberalism by the edge lords nowadays but it really doesn't makes sense. My personal opinion is the whole anti liberal thing is just Russian propaganda.

Other parties using words like liberal and perverting it doesn't prove anything. Need I remind you the Nazi called themselves Natural Socialist German Worker Party. So I guess we can't use socialist or worker rights anymore by this same logic.

You speak of falling for propaganda but the whole concept our country has been drifting right is an illusion. Our country was always right and designed to suppress liberalism from the start. It was always liberalism in name only and anti-liberal in practice.

Once you realize we have been gamed from the start and the country was designed by the rich for the rich the sooner you can drop the fantasy about our country drifting to the right.

In fact we have always been right and at moments in history paid lip service to the left. I totally get this frustrates you and it should. Shitting on liberalism doesn't solve anything as it is not the real problem.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not really sure why tankies are so bent on hammering liberal into a right wing tool. It is not

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I have a few ideas why liberals keep painting everyone who points out the fact that liberalism is a center right to right wing ideology as tankies 🙄

For the record, I'm an anti-authoritarian pacifist, meaning that only someone with an extremely superficial understanding of political ideology would ever confuse me for a tankie.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Neoliberals are rich and/or influential in higher echelon.

There are regular liberals. Who are definately left to far left of center. We're just more neutral to the economic system and more into preserving human rights.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There are regular liberals. Who are definately left to far left of center.

Those aren't liberals. You're conflating what the word means with the incorrect usage of the billionaire-owned media.

Here's Phil Ochs accurately describing liberals from a Left point of view

We're just more neutral to the economic system and more into preserving human rights.

That doesn't make any sense in a capitalist world where a lot if not MOST human rights violations are allowed to go unpunished because of economic considerations. It's just as bad as the "social liberal economic conservative" bullshit.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn't make any sense in a capitalist world where a lot if not MOST human rights violations are allowed to go unpunished because of economic considerations. It's just as bad as the "social liberal economic conservative" bullshit.

It makes perfect sense when the main economic system isn't changing anytime soon and that humans won't just magically become not shitty if changed to another one

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, I see. The "ignore the majority of the world's injustice because it's not easy to overcome" school of ethics. Never been an adherent of that particular dogma myself..

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

Not saying ignore it I'm saying be realistic. I'm saying work with whats possible now. Communism is what comes after you've already solved the world's problems

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

But....the price of eggs!

I thought everything donvict did was for the little guy!

[–] capital@piefed.social 14 points 23 hours ago

Obviously Biden's fault for not waiving his wand and enforcing this personally /s

[–] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 11 points 1 day ago

I’m becoming increasingly familiar with this photo. It should just come with the articles.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember the right-wing frenzy over “Rich Men North of Richmond”?

Oliver Anthony almost immediately clarified that Trump and Republicans were *also" the people he was talking about...

This is the danger of Dems moving "to the right". They're doing it on topics that lots of rural voters already hate that Republicans do.

The only people happy with the Dems move to the right is wealthy donors. It doesn't gain any ground with voters, just normalizes the shitty stuff republicans do and gives more credence to one of the most common reasons eligible voters don't vote:

Who am I supposed to vote for? The Republican who's blasting me in the ass or the Democrat who's blasting me in the ass?