this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
458 points (99.1% liked)

World News

39199 readers
2445 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A survey by the High Pay Centre found that 55% of respondents support capping CEO pay to maintain a fair balance between workers and bosses.

The thinktank also recommends giving workers the right to vote on company boards and increasing transparency about top pay.

The UK government is under pressure to address income inequality, which has grown by 1.3% in 2022, with the poorest 20% experiencing a 3.4% reduction in disposable income while the richest 20% saw a 3.3% increase.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lechatron 83 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pay gap between bosses and employees is totally fine, UK bosses say.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Shareholders: pay gap between bosses and employees must be increased!

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Nah, Shareholders would probably rather see that money come their way

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the world does not address the fact that companies no longer work for anything but next quarters shareholders meeting, china will eat everyone's lunch.

The fact china was able to work quietly and then make all the worlds car manufacturers technically obsolete in 5 years shows that long term planning and direction works wonders. Their models works.. just don't care about the harm you cause along the way.

There must be a middle ground that works.. I'd argue for a bigger government involved in directing the economy and countries more.. not less, profit caps and revenue taxation.. but people smarter than me might have better ideas.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think there needs to be a heavier tax on short term investment. This would disincentivize quarterly returns over multi year returns, and make investors prioritize longer term planning.

Right now you only pay taxes on stocks based on what you cash out every year, I think the length of an investment should ease its tax burden. Hold a stock for 1 year, you pay a high percentage when you sell. Hold it for years and that percentage drops every year until you hit a minimum. I think a 5 to 10 year period before it hits the tax minimum would be good for encouraging longer term investment.

It would also shift the focus away from companies being increasingly profitable over short terms periods. That’s simply not how any business works, and it’s ridiculous that it’s become the norm to expect that. It gives companies a chance to have bad quarters and years, without as much fear that their investment will dry up overnight.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I fear that will just cause the squeeze to focus on dividend payout, stock splits and buybacks.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a big difference between wanting something and doing something about it. Even if 90% of Britons wanted to cap CEO pay, if they vote for parties that don't legislate that or don't show up to the polls, it won't happen.

[–] Bogusmcfakester@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have two parties and the one with the highest chance to do this is in power cureently

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Bogusmcfakester@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

To be clear, yes we have more political parties but they don't have a hope in hell to get in and have any power unless it's in a coalition with either labor or the conservatives. They may gain seats in the commons but very little political sway.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

We have the same FPTP 2 party issue as the US.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

People who think they will be there, those who can possibly get there and those who support unfettered capitalism with or without fully understanding the concept.

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 15 points 1 week ago

The trouble is, people like my MD has an accountant, and accountants are really good at showing rich people how to save money. So my MD takes essentially no salary.

But he does take home in excess of £300k a year in dividends. As does his wife, who hasn’t worked for the firm for six years, but is still a director.

Then he gripes about pay rises for the 120 people who work for him.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

ITT:

  1. "No shit."
  2. People like the smell of Executive butthole