this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
170 points (95.2% liked)

News

23406 readers
4540 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Warren Buffett gave $1.1 billion in Berkshire Hathaway stock to family foundations and detailed plans for distributing his $147 billion fortune after his death.

His three children will oversee giving the remainder within 10 years, with designated successors in case they predecease him.

Buffett, 94, reaffirmed his belief in avoiding dynastic wealth, favoring philanthropy instead.

Over the years, he has donated $55 billion to the Gates Foundation but plans to shift focus to his family’s foundations.

Buffett continues leading Berkshire Hathaway while preparing Greg Abel as his successor.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 30 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Why wait? There is functionally no difference between $1b and $147b. He would get to see the fruits of his efforts if he spends it now.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Because if it takes 10 years to donate that much and the market stays at its 10 year average growth they stand to have something like 190b dollars left when they are done donating that 149b.

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

With that logic he should give it to Jeff Bezos so he can keep growing it after he's gone.

As long as the promise is on the horizon and they don't ever pay up then poor idiots will keep making excuses for them to not dump their ill gotten gains back into the system they stole it from!

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like you are inventing the concept of an endowment from first principles.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What do you mean?

[–] nanami@lemmy.world 93 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I once met a wealth manager for a billionaire whose entire job was to donate money as effectively as possible, focusing on infrastructure and education projects in Central and South America. She explained that the challenges are often unexpected.

For example, most smaller local organizations struggle to absorb large sums of money efficiently. Take, for instance, a group that builds homes for those in need. A sudden donation of millions of dollars can be too difficult to manage efficiently. So they try to be mindful of local needs, build trust, and build long-term partnerships.

So, why not just support many small communities? Well, a billion dollars could fund a thousand 1 million$ projects. That’s why this billionaire hired multiple wealth managers just to handle donations. That chat changed my perspective on how difficult it can be to give away large amounts of money.

Still, I’d rather them pay fair taxes.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 41 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I was about to say, they should just pay taxes, after all this is what government is for.

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

But if they donate enough then we will never force them to give up all their excess wealth.

And they like having excess wealth, a lot, like most rich people have hoarding mental disorders.

None of them really want to better society, they just want us to not rip all their skin off and redistribute their wealth so our economies benefit everyone again.

[–] trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 8 hours ago

It reminds me of this thing I read where countries would give all these donated designer clothes to some country, only for it to collapse their economy because making clothes was one of the only jobs available there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minimalfootprint@discuss.tchncs.de 61 points 10 hours ago (16 children)

"Dragon gives away hoard after death. That will fix all the lives he ruined, right?"

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 hours ago (7 children)

How did he ruin lives? Didn't he mostly make his money playing stocks and investing in stuff?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] PoopSpiderman@lemmy.world 50 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck Warren Buffett. He’s just another scumbag who has soaked up wealth by taking full advantage of neoliberal economics. There are no good billionaires.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 5 points 4 hours ago

People are so stupid, they look at that figure and go "147 billion. Huh"

That cunt is a fucking greedy evil bastard and is literally causing children to starve to death because people can't afford food. This evil shit has $18 for every man, woman and child on earth. Think about that.

I'm not some sort of reactionary but I'm astonished how people don't realise just how much suffering these evil fuckwits are causing.

Burn the cunt on a stake

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 29 points 11 hours ago

He’s entered the Rockefeller stage of his life. Build a bunch of community shelters or rebuild America’s railroad network or something useful, Warren.

[–] Phineaz@feddit.org 21 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

There comes a certain point where wealth ceases to be a blessing, and managing it becomes a full time occupation. I can respect this decision.

All the more reason to level the playing field, eh?

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 19 points 11 hours ago

I would respect it more if I wasn't so jaded, perhaps. But there's been just too many charity foundations involved in scandals of one type or another.

So, yes, let's level the playing field! I'm with you there...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Anyway I can email him asking for a couple hundred thousand? Drop in the bucket, he wouldn't even notice, yet my life would be changed forever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Buffett gives money to Bill Gates to avoid dynastic wealth. Hmm

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 10 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

Not Bill Gates, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. "The primary stated goals of the foundation are to enhance healthcare and reduce extreme poverty across the world, and to expand educational opportunities and access to information technology in the U.S.".

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Yes that is the goal they State and the propaganda they write.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

No shit. What else would he do with it? Cling on to his fortunes while descending into the particular pits of the underworld?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

That is Elon's plan.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›