this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
208 points (97.3% liked)

Linux

48719 readers
1105 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey fellow Linux enthusiasts! I'm curious to know if any of you use a less popular, obscure or exotic Linux distribution. What motivated you to choose that distribution over the more mainstream ones? I'd love to hear about your experiences and any unique features or benefits that drew you to your chosen distribution.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 152 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I use Ubuntu, which is apparently the least popular distro around.

[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I use Manjaro and based on the downvotes I received when mentioning it around here, I can assure that you are excused and you can give me this crown.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol same. When I installed Manjaro it was a popular choice, but in the past couple years sentiment has really turned against it. I haven't experienced any of the problems people claim it has, so I can't be arsed to distro hop again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I understand the criticisms of manjaro, and don't recommend it to people, but it seems to be the only distro to work with my hardware/software without issue. So for now, here I am.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Klaymore@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I switched to NixOS almost two years ago, and it's really nice being able to define my whole system in a single set of config files. If my hard drive dies or I switch computers, I can just reinstall NixOS using my config files and everything will be set up the exact same way. It's extremely solid and I don't need to baby my system because if it breaks I can just reinstall everything back to normal.

And I can share parts of the config between devices, so when I change my Neovim or VSCodium configs using Home-Manager it gets synced to my other devices, as well as being saved as part of my NixOS config files.

[–] jacob@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

+1 for Nix. In my case I switched from Opensuse Tumbleweed to NixOS about a year ago. Before NixOS I had spent years distro-hopping fairly regularly just in an effort to find something that was atleast moderately simple to setup/troubleshoot, (I'm no developer, and my Linux technical expertise really only covers the basics) and that would be resilient to the careless tinkering I tended to do in general.

Using NixOS on a daily basis has been a complete pleasure. After experiencing the sane-ness of a declarative system I'll never go back. As of late, NixOS seems to have been growing steadily in popularity, although most of its userbase are experienced developers, businesses, and almost no Linux beginners. This is understandable given its current state and reputation as an advanced distro, but I am of the opinion that--if a GUI software store for nixpkgs and a GUI program for editing the system's configuration options were developed--NixOS could quickly become one of the most desktop user-friendly distros available given its underlying immutability and unrivalled stability in general.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StrangeAstronomer@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 year ago (10 children)

voidlinux on my laptop (from Fedora) - why? I wanted to see what a systemd-less distro was like nowadays. I have used Linux since 1992 and Unix since 1984 so I'm used to SysVinit. What I find with voidlinux is a system I can understand easily - not that I struggle with systemd, but I felt there was just so much happening under the hood, just too clever by half. If I wanted MacOS, I'd have bought an Apple.

The packaging system on voidlinux is sooooo much faster than fedora. The really weird thing is that my battery life almost doubled. I can't explain it except to say that the laptop is much calmer than under fedora, which seems to run the fan constantly. Same workload, CPU governers, powertop tweaks etc etc - but battery life almost doubled.

The one downside is a smaller array of packages in the repositories. But since I'm happy installing from source for those few corner cases, it's no biggie.

I've left fedora on my media/file server for now as I still do some fedora packaging (mainly for sway related packages).

[–] gruf@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

i distrohopped a lot until i landed on Void, then i just stayed because it does everything i need, it's fast, understandable, easily tweakable, and rock solid

[–] onelikeandidie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I used Void with xfce for a year and I feel like it was the best "new" distro I've ever had my hands on. It was clean, efficient and I loved initd and xbps.

[–] Charlatan@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Void is just soo good.

  • Runit is super simple and makes sense to me. - I get to build the distro the way I want it.
  • I've learned a ton about the inner workings of Linux using Void for the last 3 years.
  • You're right about packages, but I've not had issues as I've found flatpacks or appimages for anything not offered.
  • Xbps has spoiled me. I HATE using almost every other package manager. They're all so slow and cumbersome.
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know if openSUSE Tumbleweed counts as a less popular distro but it's certainly underrated. I chose it with a roll of the dice and stayed because it's bloody good.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah btrfs and snapshots on TW is amazing. Also TW is rock solid even though it is a rolling distro.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I use Slackware, which is so unpopular it doesn't even show up in this thread, yet.
What made me choose it is the fact that it hardly ever changes, at all. It's a bit weird to set up at first, but all knowledge gained about it will stay relevant for a very long time. Also, it is a real general purpose distro, so I can use it on my gaming PC, laptop and server.

Debian would probably be a better choice when I just take practicability into account, but I like Slackware's philosophy, and running a system that forces me to learn it inside out. Arch is too bleeding edge for me.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Audacity9961@feddit.ch 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is Gentoo lacking enough popularity?

If so, I use it because it offers unrivalled flexibility, even compared to Arch, portage, which is an epic package manager, a dedicated security team, reasonably large community and developer base, source-based package distribution and fast package updates, which often outpace even arch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xyguy@startrek.website 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been running crunchbang++ on an older laptop since they updated to the latest Debian release.

I love how simple and speedy it is and since it's based on Debian 12 and GTK 4 I can still run all my software super easily.

It's also become my go-to live distro.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does Gentoo count?

It's not that unpopular. I chose it because it is very powerful. It really makes use of every Linux power there is. It makes solving problems yourself much easier, and customization is big.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nyl@lemmy.opensupply.space 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

NixOS for declarative system configuration.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nix is definitely gaining popularity quick too

[–] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I still have no idea what it actually is and at this point I'm afraid to ask, cause the answers usually contain the words "declarative", "atomic", "Haskell" "build environment" and "/nix/store/b6gvzjyb2pg0kjfwrjmg1vfhh54ad73z-firefox-118.0/"

[–] nyl@lemmy.opensupply.space 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

It all began with Nix software build system and package manager; they needee a way to build, compile software in a reproducible way. That is, if it builds on my machine, it should build on yours too given some constraints. Then they build a whole package repository for such sofware or package definitions, Nixpkgs, that can be build or retrieved using Nix package manager. Nixpkgs grew to be a repository for enabling runnig an GNU Linux OS on it: NixOS. It is declarative in the sense you write what it should contain like packages and behaves like system services. For example, see https://git.sr.ht/~misterio/nix-config.

Atomic in the sense that when you want to change system's configuration or state, everything should suceed in that update, otherwise fails; it is everything or nothing. This enables storing previous and current system revisions, so can rollback to previous state.

Nix plus things like flakes, nix shell, enables a build inviroment akin to containers, but much better, correct, and flexible.

Haskell is just an ecossytem Nixpkgs support.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] oshu@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I use Void Linux on my home servers and I really like it. Clean , small, and stable.

[–] Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Fedora Silverblue

I use Fedora Silverblue, I don't know if that (still) counts as "underground"-distro.

Reason I switched: I've been distrohopping/ desktophopping for the whole time I used Linux (~2-3 years) and always came back to Fedora. I really like it's sane (for me) defaults.

Problem: I broke pretty much any system I installed after a few weeks.
Knowing enough to change everything, but doing exactly that without knowing exactly what I do and how to fix stuff is really bad.
Instead of fixing a problem, I just reinstalled. That took me just an hour everytime, but still is a bad practice, even when it's quicker.

Also, everytime I was happy with Gnome, KDE got a shiny new feature I just wanted to have, and I switched the Fedora spin, since switching DE on a used system feels really dirty and buggy.


The last time I broke my (Tumbleweed) install without actually doing anything I just said "Fuck it, even if I loose some freedom, I will now only use immutable systems from now on!".

I decided for Fedora, and oh boy...


Actually, I didn't loose much freedom or functionality at all!

(Only exception: no VPN app, I have to use the menu from Gnome; and somehow, Boxes doesn't work atm, maybe that's just a bug).

I'm now using it for 2 months and couldn't be happier!!! Why?

  • Atomic updates + super quick and easy rollback support (already saved my butt) by rebooting and selecting another image.
  • Clear separation between "my" stuff and the OS, which is really intuitive.
  • Feels clean.
  • I can rebase anytime I want (switch to KDE, a WM, and so on) with one command and no residual data or bugs.
  • Self maintaining with automatic updates in the background.
  • Unlimited software: not an advantage of SB, but you have to use distrobox sometimes, and I would never discovered that tool without!
  • AND, a project called uBlue . You can create or download custom images, like a SteamOS/ Nobara-clone, Vanilla with QOL-changes, almost all DEs (e.g. XFCE, which is unsupported by default), and so on.

I'm really in love with Silverblue, everybody should check it out!

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] omginput@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

OpenMandriva. It is the official successor from Mandrake/Mandriva and has a rolling release edition called ROME which has brand new software. It is independent too and does not belong to a corporation.

We are looking for developers, packagers, translators, supporters. If you are interested come and join our Matrix chat :)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grimacefry@aussie.zone 16 points 1 year ago

Another for crunchbang++ a really good minimal Debian distro with no desktop environment, just Openbox window manager. Have been using since it picked up from the original crunchbang. Have built my own kinda desktop environment how I like it and I will never change.

[–] SVcross@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I use UWUntu

[–] Floey@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'd be more interested in what obscure text editors, window managers, etc people were using regardless of distro. Distro in my mind is about software release and install philosophy, any distribution that comes with a lot of preinstalled software is generally built on the back of a more skeletal distribution, and is interesting mostly for what software choices it makes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CountMonte@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I just installed Linux two nights ago! I tried Mint but it wouldn't install because of RST being enabled. I didn't feel comfortable trying to disable it, I was afraid I'd break something. I installed OpenSuse Tumbleweed and it went smoothly! It's been fun being on linux. I customized the theme, downloaded some updates and got Steam working. My only issue is booting into it. I have to boot into windows, restart holding shift and then boot to USB SSD from there. My next goal is getting a boot screen that will allow me to pick Linux or Windows drive.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've used alpine a lot on my laptop, though it's currently been relegated to my home server only. It's a great distro, if you can live with it's limitations. Stable, fast, compact and has a great package manage.

[–] PureTryOut@lemmy.kde.social 14 points 1 year ago

Alpine Linux. I started using it to dogfood my packages I was maintaining for postmarketOS but I've come to really like it. It does help that I can just fix packaging problems (or just missing packages entirely) myself.

Previously I used Gentoo which I still have a place in my heart for. If I'd ever move to anything else it would probably be Gentoo again.

[–] Mihuy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not sure if I will continue using Gentoo, but thats what I've been using for the past.

I was curious just to try to install it, but after I did it and learned about portage (package manager) and the USE flags and I really liked it beacause it gives you so much control. For example, dont want packages to have bluetooth because your motherboard doesn't support bluetooth? You can do it via USE flags per package or globally. Idk I just really like this.

But im hella busy rn in college so I might go back to arch or fedora.

Edit: Brain no worky meant to say for the past month.... mb

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wgs@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I've been a crux user for over 10 years now. I switched to it from Archlinux because it uses a port tree system for packages (think of it as the AUR but for everything) and because the package "recipes" are very simple and easy to write.

At the time I was packaging a lot of stuff on Arch and the PKGBUILD format felt too bulky, complex and constraining for my needs. I switch to crux and found one of the simplest distro out there, and sticked to it. It's also the Linux distro that feels the most like OpenBSD, which is neat as well.

Also the mascot.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Xenanthropy@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

I've been using Source Mage for about a year now! It's a source-based distro like Gentoo. It's magic themed, so instead of repositories we have grimoires, and instead of packages we have spells :) my main reason for using it is because I tried it out a few years ago and the magic themed intrigued me. Eventually I decided to write some of my own spells (some important programs were missing that I wanted) I found them a lot easier to parse than gentoos ebuilds personally. But after I'd been sending PRs for a few months, I got added to the team as an official maintainer!

it's a really fun distro to use, if not a bit hard to get up-and-running (only tarball-based install, we used to have ISOs but they're out of date for now) I've put a lot of work into getting it how i like it, i enjoy the tinkering aspect of it :) its fun

[–] bundes_sheep@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Bodhi Linux. I have an old System76 Starling netbook that stopped working after some updates left it in the dust. I think it had a netbook version of Ubuntu on it originally. Years later I installed Bodhi Linux on it (since it was supposed to be good for low spec machines) and I currently use it as an Angband terminal, a photo slideshow device, and occasionally surf the web with it just because I can :)

I'm amazed at how well it works with an Intel Atom processor, 2GB of ram, and a 250GB disk drive. Kudos to the Bodhi Linux team.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bbbhltz@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Does using Alpine for your desktop count? I don't do any server or container stuff, it works like any other distro and the packages are quite up-to-date so...

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Fedora Kinoite. Some time in the future this will only be Fedora KDE though. The future of well structured, versioned and controlled Linux Distros. So easy to service, I would never want to maintain a fleet of PCs with anything else

[–] SchrodingersPat@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use Void Linux. I switched from Arch btw because I liked their package manager, was curious about their init system runit, and still wanted a rolling release. I've used it for a little over a year now and overall I've been happy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gaael@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

CachyOS (arch-based) because I read somewhere it was good for gaming on recent rigs (supposedly pre-optimized stuff that I'll probably never learn about).

So far so good, it's been an almost "everything works out of the box" experience.

Had mainly used debian and arch before that.

[–] skillful_garbage@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

Open Media Vault (OMV)! I was given a used QNAP NAS, but didn't want to use their OS. TrueNAS has higher system requirements than what I had and Unraid is paid. OMV has been a dream! Having the flexibility of a full Debian OS, but also with the prepackaged software I need, it amazing. Plus, I love the web UI. At the time of writing this, I have 12TB of usable space with 3 months of uninterrupted uptime.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk if this counts but I found my home in a less popular distro, kind of.

I'd tried a few back in the early '00s. While my friends were experimenting with drugs and shit, I was experimenting with Linux distros and virtual machines lmao.

I started with Suse. I'm not too sure what made me switch or where I heard about this one from, but I eventually moved on to Mepis. It was originally rooted in Debian, then moved to Ubuntu before being discontinued.

My good friend at the time was big into Debian. I felt like pure Debian was too much for me to take on as a noob, but I wanted to be able to reach out to him for help now and again when I needed it. Switching to Mepis was pretty much a no-brainer. It was easy enough to get accustomed with. I was still mostly a Windows user, so the transition to KDE was simple. I'm old enough to remember the days of DOS so bumping around a CLI was also not that big of a deal.

The hardest parts were understanding how to install software (the concept of the repository was new to me), and the basic terminal commands. From there I was mostly good.

I remember when Mepis moved to Ubuntu, there were a lot of groans - myself included. But ironically, I've been a pretty much dedicated to Ubuntu for my linux stuff for ages. These days I'm running it with i3wm and I have no major complaints.

To be completely honest, though, I still don't really fully understand the standard file layout... I get it conceptually, but then stuff gets so fragmented - binary files in usr instead of bin, how to track where installed stuff ends up, etc.

I'll figure it out one day, when I really need to... But that time hasn't come yet. A quick find in the terminal always gets me what I need.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kyrinar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Idk how popular it is, especially since it's Arch based, but went with EndeavorOS after not running Linux for a few years -- work machine mandated Windows and gaming compatibility was kinda sketch at the time. Heard Gaming compatibility had improved (it has) so wanted to try it out again.

Not afraid of troubleshooting issues I cause, and bleeding edge shenanigans, but a proper Arch install from scratch was still a bit daunting. So it seemed like a good middle ground, and access to the AUR sounded nice.

Been running it with KDE Plasma for a while, been going great! Some issues with Nvidia drivers here and there but hopefully going to upgrade and swap to AMD at some point.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Opensuse micro, I also run Nixos but opensuse does a really good job at using containers easily with distrobox

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paperclip4465@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guix, because I love nix but love lisp even more

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grangle1@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure if KDE Neon counts as a "less popular" distro, but it's what I've been using for around the last half year. I appreciate the stability of being based on the latest Ubuntu LTS along with the package availability of a Ubuntu-based distro, while also getting all the latest updates to KDE software and enough updates to other software to keep me satisfied. Snap is installed but not default (my system uses very minimal numbers of snaps as a result) and Flatpak is installed so I can also easily install software that's not in the Ubuntu LTS repos as a binary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm a Slackware user, it does what I need without interfering and I can customize everything to my needs, no need to be forced to use systemd dbus pulseaudio and all those stuff.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›