this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
155 points (91.9% liked)

Science Memes

11597 readers
925 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz
155
A totally normal figure of cancer signaling pathways (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) by zlatiah@lemmy.world to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Reference (passed peer review btw):

Muhammad Salman Hameed, Hongxuan Cao, Li Guo, Lei Zeng, Yanliang Ren, Advancements, challenges, and future frontiers in covalent inhibitors and covalent drugs: A review, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Reports, Volume 12, 2024, 100217, ISSN 2772-4174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmcr.2024.100217

Try this link if the above doesn't work (not that it's worth visiting in the first place...): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277241742400089X?via=ihub

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

"I have lung cancer? How bad is it?"
"Well let's just say it's...non-small lung cancer."

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

I just want to see the tiny cars

[–] Katzenmann@feddit.org 2 points 9 hours ago

Looks like non-small lurrIb cancer to me

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

Actually that part is a legitimate classification and not part of the AI nonsense. Broadly, lung cancers are classified as either "small cell" cancers or "non small cell" cancers based on how the tumor appears microscopically. The "non small cell" cancers can be further subdivided into various types.

The reason for this distinction between the two is due to the significant difference in clinical management and prognosis. Having "small cell" lung cancer is effectively a death sentence, whereas the other types are a lot more treatable.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 14 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

What's up with this AI generated garbage? This post isn't even half a day old and the article is already down.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's still up, just remove trailing dot from DOI

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Ahh, a typo! Thank you! I wish it was down tho

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Its still there but the links goed trough like 3 proxys and sometimes fails.

Also new theory: auto generate ai slop on official platforms like science research to auto share those on social media as rage bait to then auto sell the “active” account in the furure.

It doesn’t need to be economically feasibly to be sure some people are trying something like it.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 14 hours ago

True true, AI slop sucks

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Where is Saddam?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

In the little car. :)

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's not little, it's normal-sized in a world where SUVs have become the norm.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 3 points 14 hours ago

Exactly. It's non-small!

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 4 points 16 hours ago

They're living up to the chinese stereotype unfortunately

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 21 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if they tested this on ridiculously well-endowed rats.

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 4 points 21 hours ago

If they did it would be nuts.

[–] friendlychemist@infosec.pub 78 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That image was generated by AI and edited over. They didn't even bother correcting all of it or erasing the parts that didn't make sense.

Ffs, this is blatant.

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 17 points 1 day ago

edited over

What did they edit?

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How in the fuck did this pass peer review?

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

what peer review? This is likely one of the many reviewless journals that solely exist to publish, for a generous fee, shit that wouldn't even pass as an undergrad homework. people then can write in their CVs for grant applications or position applications in low tier universities etc The name of the journal is usually chosen to look fancy and very international so it looks good on your CV. Honestly there are so many such journals now, no one person would be able to tell which is which, it's a complete mess. Humans find a way of fucking up everything for profit.

[–] neurospice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 21 hours ago

I'm wondering if the editors are actually just ChatGPT

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 day ago

Not even peer review, the problem doesn't go far enough to reach the level of checking the scientific methodology. Did nobody even read the article before publishing? They don't have editors in the journal this was published in?

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 16 hours ago

It didn't

[–] Laser@feddit.org 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Dang, is always the small cars.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only way to fight small cars is with COVEEENT INHIBTORS

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago

Despite the constant negative press covfefe

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Maybe c/FuckCars is on to something.

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Small cars are fine, it's the non-small ones that are cancerous

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Turn around, bright eyes.

EGFR and AFATINIB

And I need you now tonight.

And I need you more than ever.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago

Afatinib is real though

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 1 day ago

Non-small lung cancer: 🚙

Seems legit.

[–] ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago

Everything reminds me of HER2.

[–] Mitsu@pawb.social 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

NOOO GO AWAY, BIND/TORTURE/KILL KILLER DO NOT GIVE ME CANCER

[–] AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doi seems to be a dead link now?

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

I can still see it.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

text looks sus too