this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
804 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12792 readers
1103 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 40 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

There is nothing makes me leave a store quicker than having to wait on a worker for a basic item that shouldn't be locked away.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Deodorant at CVS/walgreens 🙄

[–] lemonSqueezy@lemm.ee 24 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (5 children)

Even if their claim of "organized theft" is true, that itself would be a self-correcting market force. Your price point should exist somewhere between the extreme of "lock it up so tight nobody can buy it" and "it's cheaper for people to shoplift it en masse". If you can't manage that, maybe you deserve to go out of business (also I think you'll find that it would also help to increase the number of staff to actually unlock the damn shelves). Perhaps in the long run the market will self correct, but this is absolutely idiotic right now. And the real consequences for people that have lost their local pharmacy are catastrophic.

[–] FPSXpert@discuss.online 3 points 13 hours ago

I view this as a self correction in itself as well. Walgreens is losing money because they skewed so far that they're annoying customers into leaving en masse for other options. Now their options are they can either go back to the old model that worked better, or they can keep playing hardball until more stores go out of business, and someone else can take over that corner and sell better.

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget that there is always online shopping out there as well.

[–] FPSXpert@discuss.online 3 points 13 hours ago

Delivery really is just much more convenient. I've been getting my groceries delivered like this from a certain big box retailer and it's been very nice. No more bullshit traffic, bullshit parking, bullshit walk in and out, bullshit aisle walking around slow people, bullshit searching, bullshit looking for an employee for 20 minutes to help get a $3 stick of deodorant, bullshit line at checkout, etc etc. Now it's just click add to cart and it shows up at my door the next day.

I'm sure it's partly by design because they charge a subscription for the service, but the convenience and money/time saved not having to drive makes it so worth it.

[–] prof_wafflez@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Some report said the claim of organized theft was not true or greatly exaggerated

[–] WagyuSneakers@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

It wasn't true. It was used to disguise crumbling profits as American shopping habits changed out of necessity.

[–] lemonSqueezy@lemm.ee 4 points 21 hours ago

that's my understanding as well

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I learned this from the "Black Market" episode of Battlestar Galactica

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Those are not two extremes of a "price point", you describe two scenarios on the high end with no sweet spot in between. Good job confusing me trying to read your sentence correctly :p

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago

Keep stealing then

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I honestly do not get how thick these people can be, yet get so well paid in these high up positions.

[–] TammyTobacco@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The corporate world doesn't promote people based on ability, it promotes based on how much ass you kiss and what college your parents could afford to send you.

[–] WagyuSneakers@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

If the CEO of Bob's Store hired Senator John's son then suddenly zoning issues disappear for his new space. The CEO of Bob's even donates to several fundraisers for Senator John and makes donations to charities he knows John is a part of. John uses this information to inform his decision on who gets a cushy position position at the charity and if Bob's competitor will be allowed to expand.

[–] schizolol9@lemy.lol 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No shit its so annoying having to ask a worker to unlock the damn glass door just for $5-$10 item.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

At my Walgreens there are usually some people in the pharmacy, one person on the registers and maybe one person in cosmetics. I'm not bugging the only cashier to unlock toothpaste that costs double what it does anywhere else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago

Lock everything up then understaff your stores so there's no one to ask to unlock an item even if you were so inclined to go to the trouble. Great success.

[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (14 children)

My favorite is home depot locking up stuff but not locking up the bolt cutters

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ZeroCool@feddit.org 269 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Yeah turns out people don’t like:

  1. Being treated like criminals
  2. Having their time wasted

Walgreens’ inventory shrinkage is not my problem. Locking everything up rather than paying loss prevention staff is just going to piss everyone off.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, they've been steadily reducing the number of staff in the stores to save money. I'd say look, you have that savings, just accept some shrinkage. Or you can hire more staff, your choice.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 139 points 1 day ago (30 children)

Being treated like criminals

I've been followed around a store. Guess what store I've never bought from and won't be back to.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Buttplugs R Us?

load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 125 points 1 day ago (4 children)

"But it does impact how sales work through the store because when you lock things up," he added, "for example, you don’t sell as many of them. We’ve kind of proven that pretty conclusively."

wow, check out the brains on this guy

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember: You get a business degree because you're not talented enough for the arts and not smart enough for engineering or medicine.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve always heard “what do you call a failed med student? The hospital administrator.”

Know what they call the med student who graduated bottom of his class?

"Doctor."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well in Walgreens: if you see someone shoplifting...

ask how they can help you open up the thing locked up because I pushed that god damn button and it's been 15 minutes and I haven't seen a god damn employee yet Jesus Christ I came here for a quick trip like wtf I could have ordered this online you fucking morons

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it's locked up, I won't buy it. I don't have time for that nonsense and large companies only understand money (or a lack of) before they will make a change.

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't buy locked up stuff because I don't want to talk to people.

we-are-not-the-same.jpg

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 86 points 1 day ago (13 children)

It's really simple: either you accept shrink, or you hire enough people with keys to handle your anti-theft shit.

I don't go to target anymore, CVS, or Walgreens if it's at all avoidable because it's going to take an hour to get in, buy a few things, and leave.

They want to lock shit up, but then only have one employee covering the whole damn store that can unlock shit, meaning if you want some laundry detergent, it's going to take you half an hour.

Of course, the local grocery stores, Walmart, Amazon, and various other retailers don't lock shit up, so yeah, I just go there and don't have to deal with stupid bullshit pushed by morons who haven't gone shopping in one of the stores they run.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] gidostro@lemmy.cafe 78 points 1 day ago

The only thing worse than shaming your customer is inconveniencing them.

load more comments
view more: next ›