this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
706 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19607 readers
3961 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez urged countering the Trump administration’s policies by resisting at every turn, arguing that its incompetence makes it vulnerable.

Her remarks followed chaos caused by a rescinded executive order that temporarily shut down Medicaid portals nationwide.

She encouraged activists to take offline action, citing ongoing mobilization efforts.

Her strategy focuses on making governance difficult for Trump, calling his administration “dangerous and cruel” but also “shockingly dim.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 35 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

It isn't chump and his taintsuckers you gotta worry about.

It's the army of Federalist Society lawyers and policy experts around him. They've spent decades figuring out the removed in the armor of our governmental system. Figuring out how to dismantle it piece by piece.

Edit - wtf is that removed about? Wait....oh. bot thinks I did a racism.

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Fucken hell, that's the correct fucking way to define a gap in armor. Bullshit. I really want to try a bunch of slurs out and see what sets it off.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

Go removed ahead you removed.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Not much since you're on .world. .ml is much more strict.

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Jebus. I still haven't figured out if .ml is government funded or true believers. Very strange to me.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It's the home instance of the founders of Lemmy, who are communists. I don't know their views on authoritarian communism like Stalin or Mao, but people who thought these were good leaders are the "tankies" you may have heard of. There are a lot of them on .ml.

[–] Pazu900@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Are you saying your comment was edited?

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

There are better Lemmy hosts out there, just waiting for you to join.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There was as guy running around with a list of smaller, worthwhile instances.

I ended up on lemmy.zip more recently after starting on kbin, then moving to .world.

lemm.ee seems to be gaining popularity.

sh.itjust.works is also pretty well represented, its users seem normal enough afaik.

lemmy.dbzer0 is an anarchist instance, their admin is super knowledgeable and seems like a cool guy.

lemmy.blåhaj.zone is a radically inclusive, safe instance. They're virulently anti-bigotry and anything perceived as "anti-marginalized" groups will likely be removed/banned.

There are hundreds of instances, 569 as of writing this. Some are niche and focused on specific hobbies or uses and a bunch of others are general purpose. It's worth clicking around and sorting a few different ways to find a server you like. Remember you can export your settings and import them into an account on another instances so moving is relatively painless.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 hours ago

Thank you very much.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

I just signed up with the first one that worked, and it still took a while to actually get it created.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 54 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

"Tyranny is eroded by a sea of small acts. Everything matters."

A lot of Lemmy users really need to understand this. Far too often I see people deride want action that doesn't immediately fix all problems in the world as worthless or meaningless, simply because they lack the imagination needed to see how small actions can add up to big changes.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's true, but it can also be used in reverse as a pacifying mechanism. For example, contributing to making the US the most incarcerated population in the world with ridiculously strict "tough on crime" legislation and then pardoning a small fraction of prisoners. Another example is forcing student loan debt to stick around through bankruptcy, but then forgiving a tiny fraction of loans. It's a move to pretend change is in motion, but it's so small and so slow that it's never going to actually solve the problem. This is especially bad when the other party makes such huge moves in the negative direction while we're supposed to be content with tiny steps toward "progress".

[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 hours ago

Neighbor, you're who they're speaking to...

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

This Lemmy user has the right idea.

[–] dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

finally, a person with a STRATEGY. so sick of the whining.

she needs volunteers for personal escort and safety. i think she is going to be targeted.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 hour ago

She has employees

Donate to her

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If only AOC didn't whip up a battle plan to prevent the union strike when she voted to protect the rail corporation.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Bit late. I appreciate her efforts to resist, and we all need to do that, but it honestly is too late now. The time to resist this was last year. Now we’re in disaster recovery, which requires a whole different kind of resistance, and it feels like even people like her don’t quite understand where we are now.

Because of all the people who haven’t fucking listened to the warnings, we’ve entered actual fascism, and regular resistance won’t work anymore. Thinking it will only makes more of us believe small actions or Strong Words will save us. This isn’t 1930 Germany like we were warning last year, it’s 1939 Germany now, and der führer is beginning to build the camps.

Are you going to keep ignoring us when you’re ruffling the ashes of your compatriots from your hair? I honestly believe you will.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 13 minutes ago (1 children)

You must be fun at resistance parties. I guess it's time to annihilate ourselves through labor then (งツ)ว

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 minutes ago

I’m just saying we need different, more modern strategies. What we’ve been doing doesn’t work.

We can do better. I don’t know the answer, but we can’t keep doing the same things.

[–] SirEDCaLot 0 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

I think both you and her are wrong. Dems lost big in this last election. So it's time to take a fucking step back and ask why. What needs changing? The party is in trouble. And they are in trouble because they are listening to big business and political consultants and not voters and people like AOC and Bernie. Kamala was supposed to be easy 'safe' candidate to defeat Trump. How'd that work? Hillary was supposed to be the 'safe' candidate to beat him the first time. Safer than Bernie and his 'crazy radical platform' of actually making the country work for the fucking people who live in it. How'd that work out?

Maybe having candidates that manipulate the primary process and count on superdelegates doesn't work. Maybe putting someone forward who polled at 2% among Democrats before election season doesn't work. Maybe 'I'm not Trump' isn't fucking good enough to win the White House.

Unfortunately I don't see many Democrats talking about this lesson, let alone taking it to heart. So I am looking forward to four more years of complaining and hopelessly attempting damage control while putting forward no new ideas whatsoever.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 0 points 32 minutes ago

So it's time to take a fucking step back and ask why.

Obviously we should ask why. But any answers we come up with in response to whatever strategy we’ve been using will be horribly outdated already because we’re no longer operating under even a veiled democracy.

That was the biggest answer to ‘why’ this last time. Because this is outright, honest to dog fascism. That’s why nothing worked. Because you cannot fight fascism with normal discourse. Because Dems, the media, and everyone still tried to pretend we were working under the status quo when we absolutely were not, and anyone trying to call that out was treated as some kind of alarmist. And the fascists know this, and take advantage of it in their propaganda. Most of us don’t want to believe there’s a true, real, legitimate fascist movement, and fascists use that against us.

It doesn’t actually matter how good Dem candidates are – Dems could run Jesus himself, seen by all as descending from on high and streamed simultaneously on TikTok, YouTube, and Twitch, and it wouldn’t have mattered. They would easily reject Jesus and get all the centrists to oppose him. We’re in an unprecedented age of propaganda owned exclusively by a handful of sociopaths who know they can buy sentiment, views, and votes. They did, and there’s little we can do about it.

It doesn’t matter what democrats say or do at this point. We’re past that.

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That would be a great plan if the Dems were not spineless at best and complicit at worse

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

People see comments like this and get discouraged to vote or do anything meaningful. Life is choosing the lesser of two evils. By not choosing you have chosen the greater evil thus making you complicit.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 47 minutes ago* (last edited 46 minutes ago) (1 children)

Bullshit. Electoral reform in the blue states must happen. Red states as well but we all know republicans stance on more democracy.

Democrats have lost their "we are the only people resisting the republicans" privilege. They should have lost it long ago but we sure gave em every chance we could. No more chances, no more safe states/seats.

This shouldn't be hard to pass. Alaska already has a Ranked choice voting system. Plus Democrats are huge democracy supporters... right?

Videos on Electoral Reform

First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

Videos on alternative electoral systems we can try out.

STAR voting

Alternative vote

Ranked Choice voting

Range Voting

Single Transferable Vote

Mixed Member Proportional representation

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 13 minutes ago

Judging from the downvotes, there are plenty of liberals who benefit from the status quo and choosing to be tone deaf.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

That lesser evil still don't want Medicare for all, raise the federal minimum wage, and building more affordable housing-- all of which are actually what suffocate many Americans in the ever worsening wealth inequality. That's why people took the chance to vote Trump who promised tax cut, even though most Americans know they it doesn't actually benefit them but the 1%.

Look outside of the American mainstream news bubble and discourse that want you to pick the two lesser evils, instead of thinking outside the box. The only way for ordinary Americans to win basic rights is to organise and mobilise by advocating both ranked choice voting and promoting third parties. It won't happen in federal level so start on the local and state levels, and the changes will go up the chain to federal level. It's not like Americans haven't gone and out mobilised before for a better change. The people simply need to rediscover that they have the power.

[–] sudo42@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Bad Change - Republicans
"Fundamentally nothing will change" - Democrats
Change Americans need - ?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 17 minutes ago

You will be happy with the breadcrumbs we give you or you are getting a bad change from Republicans. - Democrats

Americans want Medicare for all, raising minimum wage and affordable housing, which Democrats are voting down. If you don't recognise that then you benefit from the status quo and refuse to admit it.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Look at the "secret service detail" he picked.

He picked loyalty over skill, actually DEI

Just a few inches to the right

Few More Inches

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 25 points 6 hours ago

He got rid of DEI to make more room for cronyism.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 224 points 11 hours ago (45 children)

Any kind of on the ground movement or mobilization needs political support in the halls of power. It's what made the resistance demonstrated against Trump the first term possible, and the dynamic goes both ways. On the ground resistance gives political actors the space to be resilient. Resilient politicians give in the ground movement space to work.

Basically all other Democrats other than Bernie and AOC shrivelling up and hiding in their shells will have a chilling effect on our ability to organize on the ground.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 33 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I've been bitching about the lack of leadership from the Democrats for a while now - I'm glad to see that others are seeing it too.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 hours ago

They need to dump Wasserman-Schulz. She's a big part of the reason we're in this mess.

[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's all been downhill since JFK...

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 hours ago

LBJ at least pushed for laws, he helped convince white senators to vote for the Civil Rights Act. I think if we had a second LBJ, we'd have something done.

...I'd rather not have a new VIetnam war if that was the case, however.

[–] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 33 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Heinrich from NM has made it clear that he will pushback. Let’s see what that looks like. I suggest folks that can contact your reps, now and frequently.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (43 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›