this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
374 points (99.0% liked)

politics

22294 readers
3640 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary:


The Trump administration’s proposal to vet social media profiles of green card applicants already legally in the U.S. has been condemned in initial public feedback as an attack on free speech.

Visa applicants living abroad already have to share their social media handles with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, but the proposal under President Donald Trump would expand the policy to those already legally in the country who are applying for permanent residency or seeking asylum.

USCIS said the vetting of social media accounts is necessary for “the enhanced identity verification, vetting and national security screening.”

The agency also said it was necessary to comply with Trump’s executive order titled “Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats.”

“In a review of information collected for admission and benefit decisions, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) identified the need to collect social media identifiers (‘handles’) and associated social media platform names from applicants to enable and help inform identity verification, national security and public safety screening, and vetting, and related inspections,” the agency announced on March 5.

President Donald Trump’s administration has proposed vetting the social media handles of immigrants already legally in the U.S. who are applying for green cards or permanent citizenship. The plan has been condemned as a ‘violation of the First Amendment.’


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 79 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So basically he wants to deport legal residents for Luigiposting, making fun of Tesla, or acknowledging that Palestinians and trans people are humans.

Can we please switch to the timeline where Bernie just finished his second term and the Mango Mussolini is in jail for the rest of his miserable life? Pretty please with porn on top?

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

1st Amendment means nothing to these fascists

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

Elon Musk is silent about freedom of speech all of a sudden

[–] biegoditch@lemmy.cafe 11 points 3 days ago

I only have a few lemmy throwaways

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"I don't use social media"

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

ICE: "Hands behind your back. Stop resisting!"

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

"why don't you use social media? What are you hiding?"

[–] astutemural@midwest.social 57 points 4 days ago

Anyone think about what they used to do before we started making indelible records of all our social activity? Probably ask you some questions and that's it. Yet now they think it's 'vital' that they be able to see everything you ever said to your friends? Bullshit it is, they're just powerhungry petty tyrants.

[–] AizawaC47@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago

Visa applicants living abroad already have to share their social media handles with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, but the proposal under President Donald Trump would expand the policy to those already legally in the country who are applying for permanent residency or seeking asylum.

Green card, visa applicants, seeking asylum… and then when does it come to actual us American citizens then? Especially those that were born here? Like when will it come to us all?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Just another reason to avoid the US like a plague. On the other hand, with bird flu and measles running more or less unchecked in a country with a horrible health system and an antivaxxer at the helm for health, avoiding the US is avoiding the plague.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago (4 children)
[–] aramova@infosec.pub 42 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Likely considered not adhering to conditions and having their card cancelled.

Legal or not, that's how these fascists work.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago

I guess they don't get their green card ?

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Prison most likely

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

With each passing day, the Dark Forest theory of social media seems all the more prescient....

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So, to be a greencard holder, you need to run at least one social media account that is active?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

He probably prefers X. His homie has turned it into a hangout for all the other nazi homies.

.......can you tell I don't like the word "homie", and would like to give it a negative vibe?

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Green card = legally a Permanent US Resident, protected by us law.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

From a MAGA perspective:

Green card = foreigner, deport them.

I hate talking to them. Because they outright don't think green card people should have rights

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, this if for the applicants for a green card, so he basically wants people to invade their privacy if they want to become a permanent citizen.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Might as well get them used to lack of privacy from the get-go.

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

This is about people applying to get a green card.

[–] 1984 22 points 4 days ago

People need to stop centralizating on big tech platforms with direct ties to us government.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If/when this gets to citizens, they’re gonna be so mad about my dissing them on the Internet that Elon is gonna try to build an even bigger spaceship to launch me directly into a Kuiper Belt object.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 8 points 4 days ago

Honestly? If there are windows, I'd like to join you.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 days ago

privacy matters, folks.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Start your formal profiles (FB, Insta, LinkedIn, the ones that boomers know about) and post neutral stuff sparingly. Go hog wild on the ones you'll never admit to having. Just use a different email address.

[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do not do this. A different email address will not hide anything about what you do online from Meta or xitter or any data broker that sells all your data to them.

The US is going down the path of social credit score like China at this point, anything you say can and will be used against you.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why have more than account on the older platforms? That's not what I mean at all.

[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Make any account with any email address on any service that shares data with any data broker and use this account for about a week.

They'll have enough data on you to tie the activity to your actual name and physical devices by the end of the week, usually sooner.

[–] shani66@ani.social 1 points 3 days ago

Not if you take steps to prevent that. You'd have to be seriously paranoid to be in the clear, but you can spoof a lot of identifying data and your general activity is almost certainly not enough to pin you down specifically.

[–] Exeous@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What of peoples not in us? He demand see profile to?

You not have account, you not travel to us?

You have account he see all detail of life in eu?

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Looks like you’re not compliant. Off to prison with you.

[–] ubergeek 5 points 3 days ago

He probably got that idea from Kathy Hochul's CCIA, which mandated anyone getting a pistol permit, or semi-auto hunting rifle permit to fork over all social media logins.

That was, of course, knocked down, as a 1A infringement, rightfully so. I'm guessing the SCOTUS will love this version, though.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm not even religious, but I still know about the Whore of Babylon.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I didn't know my mom was Babylonian

[–] GoodLuckToFriends 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'd bet she's a neo-chaldean.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

I'd Hittite that.

load more comments
view more: next ›