this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
726 points (99.1% liked)

politics

22958 readers
4316 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that President Donald Trump is exploring legal pathways to “deport” U.S. citizens to El Salvador, where the administration has already arranged to house deported immigrants in a prison known for its human rights abuses.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 7 points 6 days ago

That's insane.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

I love how they just casually admit that they're "exploring ways" to break the law.

[–] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 167 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Don’t worry guys! He only wants to deport the worst criminals! You know, like the enemies of the people. Now, who was it that he call the enemy of the people, again…?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 134 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

First they came for the students protesting the genocide and to divest from Israel... and we said FUCK THOSE PROTESTORS!

[–] gjoel@programming.dev 81 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Rapists, gang members, democrats, red haired people, wokists... You know. The enemy!

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago

Then finally the non-loyalists

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I keep my wok hidden away in a secret room in the attic where they’ll never find it and make stir fry in a good old fashioned American manufactured skillet like our good lord and orange savior intended. You’ll never brand me a wokist

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Everyone is a enemy combatant in the War on Flavor

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I did not have "The Nazi's will outsource their gulags to El Salvador" on my fascism 2025 bingo card... I need to get more creative, or possibly criminally insane.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 6 days ago

Man, pay attention to terminology:

  • Nazi = Lager

  • Soviet = Gulag

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Its only until our own black site at Guantanamo has completed their new 30,000 prisoner facility. Then we can torture and execute dissidents ourselves, outside if the view of the media and courts.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 111 points 1 week ago (5 children)

So yeah if that's the case then we need to seriously explore ways to remove him from office

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Removal of Trumps entire regime should be the core demand of the protests, instead of that milquetoast "Hands off" BS

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, certainly we can count on the republicans to vote to impeach and convict once they see him disregard the constitution.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would they impeach him for something the Republicans on the Supreme Court will declare perfectly legal?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That time came a long time ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] the_wiz@feddit.org 100 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Of course he does.

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First they came for the socialists ... But the US was coming for the socialists at the time, so that part is left out at the Holocaust museum memorial.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Actually first they came for LGBTQ+ people and scientists studying controversial subject matter, but the guy who wrote the poem was a conservative Catholic priest, so he didn't mind.

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Worse than that, he was part of a group that carved out special exemptions for their churches with Hitler. And was a raging anti-semite until his death bed iirc.

So a traditional conservative who only saw evil when it affected him. And only insofar as HOW it affected him.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Man, can you imagine hating on your deathbed? I'd think of the slightly less shitty times.

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A piece of garbage that has a far better legacy than he deserves.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, his legacy is about regretting a mistake for not standing up for others even if he doesn't like them. I don't think that's a legacy of doing good even if it's a good legacy. I think he has the legacy he deserves; being known for failing to do what's right even when others died doing so.

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

You have a very good point. Not even remotely remorseful for being motivated by blind hatred, but able to at least consider the babies of a basic ethical framework based solely on pragmatism.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 16 points 1 week ago

That makes it a better poem in retrospect, imo. It demonstrates its own moral

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

Actually, first they came for physically and mentally handicapped. The clergy spoke up because they were the first to notice that the families in their church with vulnerable individuals were all receiving letters that their family member had died while getting government-mandated "treatment" in a government hospital.

Hitler was "shocked, " and pledged to end the program. Instead, it went underground, and evolved into the Holocaust.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 93 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Can't wait to find out if I've been vocal enough to be selected as a concentration camp candidate!

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least we'll all have company...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So when is the rest of the world putting sanctions on El Salvador?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 81 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does anyone still think America isn't a dictatorship?

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago (6 children)

TBH its not very obvious. Immigration officials around the world probably still view the US as a democracy. If an American were to apply for political asylum in, say, the EU, for example, it would likely get rejected.

We need something very concrete, like if 2026 elections get cancelled or martial law declared, then they would actually take asylum applications seriously.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (11 children)

2nd amendment doesn't just apply for Nazis.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is really simple. You put a swastika on your flag, blow an important empty building and you say the country is in an emergency, transfering all powers to White House.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

aw man....everyday i go like: sure them muricans cant come up and even do stupider shit today. yesterday was so stupid...seriously no chance for stupider shit.

but then...dang...again they did it. not only the orange guy...most of them. schumer, fetterman, cruz...they all have tapped into the only infinite resource. may idiocracy prevail,right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (12 children)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Well, it didn't take as long as I thought it would to come to this.

load more comments
view more: next ›