this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
155 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13784 readers
920 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 55 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Hot take: There’s no such thing as the Fermi Paradox, the day I learned anything about radio emissions is the day that theory became bunk to me, the radio bubble surrounding earth is only 75-light-years wide, and the furthest signals are weak and undetectable even with sensitive equipment

The theory rests on the assumption that radio is a universal technology and not a short-lived transitional technology, most of this planet already communicates primarily thru microwaves and fiber optics, even if radio is a common “transitional” technology the magnitudes of time implied in trying to find it at the right time in space makes detection nearly impossible

At a certain distance we can’t distinguish between natural and artificial radio signals, the debates over the WOW! Signal and BLC1 show even if you detect “something” it doesn’t mean much to the wider scientific community

We JUST started looking for techno-signatures in an organized fashion during the last four years, and even that method suffers from similar problems to the radio method (debate over Taby’s Star for instance)

We’re a blind, deaf person in the middle of the woods who occasionally whispers Marco Polo every ten years and then wonders where everyone is

[–] Lemister@hexbear.net 24 points 2 days ago

Also thinking that civilization has to conform to human norms. Besides there could be hundreds of alien biospheres relatively close, yet a xeno tree or xeno fish can’t really send back a signal now, could it?

[–] kittin@hexbear.net 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think the Fermi paradox is anthropomorphic.

There’s an assumption built into it that “civilization” is the end point of life, the “highest” or “most advanced” form of life. But biology doesn’t work that way.

I’m absolutely certain that the universe is filled with organic chemistry and life but the idea that civilization is inevitable or stable seems anthropomorphic. Civilization has barely existed on earth for 5 or 10 thousand years, and it has only been doing stuff that would be detectable from far away for maybe 1 or 2 centuries.

From a sample size or 1 we can already see that is an uncommon state for life to exist in, and it already seems like an unstable niche to occupy.

Life has existed on earth for what 4 billion years, complex life for 500 to 1000 million, and civilization for 10,000 at most. There’s every reason to suppose that life is inevitable when the planet permits that kind of chemistry but practically no basis to assume civilization is inevitable when life exists.

[–] gobble_ghoul@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago

Doesn’t detract from your point, but I think you’re meaning “anthropocentric” lol.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago

Yeah, the whole thing assumes that the aliens would be using a communications technology that:

  1. we can actually detect it with our current technology.
  2. would still be identifiable as communications by completely different alien species.
  3. wouldn't just become a garbled mess by the time it reaches its destination.

We've had radio technology for about a century, vs the 10,000 years or so of human societies existing. Even as recently as 200 years ago, we'd probably be expecting the aliens to show up on horseback with a handwritten missive to be read to us. We make a lot of assumptions that they would use radio waves to communicate, and would beam radio waves at us, when we could very well be using technology that these aliens abandoned for more advanced communications technology centuries or even millennia ago.

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago

Yeah, my position as a biologist is that, from everything we know, it looks like proto-life started pretty much as soon as conditions on earth made it possible. The chance that there's no other life in the universe is pretty much just the chance that there are no planets substantially similar to earth (gravity not too crazy, has liquid water, atmosphere, magnetosphere etc) and that's obviously bunk.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 90 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (19 children)

I think people underestimate just how much resources would be required even for our own planet to be fully space faring.

The fuel for our current ships, for example, is in short supply. There is only so much rocket fuel on Earth and each time we send something up requires a LOT. Remember that next time Tesla sends some burger or CEO to space for a PR stunt.

People treat technology and science like it's some magic thing that will keep getting more advanced to the point it can do any magical thing. But sometimes the answer science gives you is "there is literally not enough matter and energy on our planet to ever do this." But of course we have these weird infinite growth brainwarms that see technology like a progression line in a video game instead of the result of observing and studying the material world.

[–] Sulv@hexbear.net 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Don’t listen to this alien propaganda

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 34 points 2 days ago

The absolute idiot. If we don't have enough matter, we will simply create more

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago

Aliens pay me good money to post here you better not fuck up my gig.

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago

Fuck I forgot to consider doge

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

People treat technology and science like it's some magic thing that will keep getting more advanced to the point it can do any magical thing. But sometimes the answer science gives you is "there is literally not enough matter and energy on our planet to ever do this."

I blame the Civilization games

Liberal capitalism too, but also the Civilization games

Incidentally, this is one thing I love about Shadow Empire. It's a 4X game that takes place on a randomly generated planet, all resource deposits are finite, and you have to tailor your economic and military strategy to the planetary conditions and resources available. If the planet's a lifeless rock, it won't have any oil reserves, so your motorized and mechanized forces will have to rely on biodiesel or electric engines. No atmosphere but lots of rare earth metals? Get your power from solar panels. Bone-dry desert world? You will fight all-out wars for an underground lake.

[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago

This mindset existed long before Civ though.

[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A space elevator would fix this.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Imagine getting in the spave elevator and some jerk presses all the buttons 😩😡

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

What do you mean? Is there even enough steel on earth to build something that tall? How would such a structure be possible when we can't even keep our ground level structures properly maintained?

[–] hexthismess@hexbear.net 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The current idea is carbon tubes to make the supports light enough, but material science is nowhere near close enough for a space elevator.

[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

and this is why we must build the space staircase first before we embark on the mysteries of the elevator

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The key idea of a space elevator is that it's being held in tension by a counterweight just past the point of a geosynchronous orbit. The problem of course being that even being in tension like that we don't have anything that could support its own weight let alone the capacity to construct and place such a massive structure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Meltyheartlove@hexbear.net 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Me if they send me to space pika-pickaxe

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Hydro-LOx (read: water) is one of the most efficient conventional fuels, and it's in use in NASA's Space Launch System powering the Artemis program.

Even if you assume somehow all the fresh water has disappeared, there's still solar-powered electrolysis to create hydrolox from sea water.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] newmou@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago

China’s single thorium reactor will take us there

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ComradeSpahija@hexbear.net 50 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Humiliating. Yet another massive W for Earth, the best planet in the universe.

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago

The moment I found out that other planets, even with moons, don't have proper total solar eclipses I felt very privileged to be an Earthling.

[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago

I bet their planet doesnt even have beans beanis How will aliens ever recover

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 37 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Doesn't the Fermi "Paradox" involve plugging in a lot of purely vibes-based values into the Drake Equation?

[–] Sulv@hexbear.net 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I thought it was essentially: the universe is really fucking big so there must be life, so why haven't we seen it yet?

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I think the answer is "The universe is really fucking huge and we haven't explored even a fraction of it yet." And "Alien animals do not want to make themselves known or are incapable of making themselves known." Some alien species that resembles a microscopic sessile sponge colony isn't going to be obvious to us, for example.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The implication is that they can't explore the universe because the gravitational pull of their planet is to big to escape?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 45 points 2 days ago (4 children)

We managed to escape our gravity well with technology from the 20th century.

K2-18bians could be at our technological level and still not escape their gravity well. I think a planet twice as big as ours would require rockets as heavy as the pyramids of Giza just to reach orbit, never-mind exiting their planet's orbit into deeper space.

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

wiki it says the gravity is 12.43 m/s2

Apparently much less dense

[–] Sulv@hexbear.net 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah if Earth’s gravity is 9.8 m/s^2^, I think that would mean a planet twice the mass would have a gravity of ~96m/s^2^. Correct me if I’m wrong physicist hexbears.

Edit: upon cursory reading it seems much more complicated than this. Basically the force needed to leave the gravitational pull doesn’t necessarily directly correlate to the gravity exerted by the object, size and distance are involved too

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CeliacMcCarthy@hexbear.net 38 points 2 days ago (3 children)

it's gravity, yes, but also that this is almost definitely an ocean planet with no land. Good luck developing metallurgy underwater, to say nothing of fossil fuels etc

[–] Sulv@hexbear.net 31 points 2 days ago

Super soaker spaceship

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 25 points 2 days ago

This is something I've been thinking about. My gut feeling is that life or some life equivalent has independently evolved near countless times, but the whole "why have we not detected signs of some advance alien civilization yet" paradox is explained by memes like these. Just because you have life and even intelligent life doesn't mean they would be starfaring. People focus on stuff like the habitable zone, but what about the conditions needed for natural furnaces to form or conditions needed to build an artificial furnace? My guess is that a planet that could support a furnace would need:

  1. Oxygen. Combustion is needed for oxygen.

  2. Organic substance as fuel. This could be in the form of hydrocarbons or things like wood.

  3. Dry land. This is to actually build the furnace. Plus, it's a lot harder to ignite wet things.

  4. Not being cold as fuck. I guess I'm just listing the fire triangle at this point lol

From here, it would then come down to whether the planet has anything worth putting into the furnace to smelt.

[–] Sleve_McDichael@hexbear.net 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What if they just build a really big staircase

I think Led Zeppelin tried this back in the 70s

[–] WizardOfLoneliness@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This doesn't mean there isn't life there, they basically just detected fart gas, at no point were they suggesting intelligent life

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

That's true, but even if it's xeno algae farting, the fact it's a measly 124 light years away basically confirms the Universe is teeming with life

Which gives us an incredibly high numerical value for the f1 factor of the Drake Equation, which then gives us a foundation for the next factor which deals with intelligence emerging

The distance is the most interesting potential aspect of this discovery

[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

I think this is an important point that gets glossed over. Alien life does inlcude stuff such as micro organisms and that is mostly what its going to be when talking about life . Folks just think of stuff like highly advanced civilizations.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago

The meme makes a great point actually. Though I feel it should also be pointed out that there would be many small planets, earth size and smaller, that we struggle to detect. Our detection method works by measuring the dip in starlight as a planet eclipses the star, and it is much easier to detect a large planet with a short orbit. This one orbits in about 30 days, so lots of transits.

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

thick atmosphere makes spaceplanes easy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tamagotchicowboy@hexbear.net 21 points 2 days ago

Why leave a perfect planet when you can create remote devices to explore the cosmos for you and do more important things like summon the volcel-judge aww day and such and spend the time thinking of how you will avoid things like the death of your star, heat death of the universe and other 'threats'.

load more comments
view more: next ›