this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
148 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

567 readers
641 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

"LOOK UPON THE FACE OF YOUR NEW POPE. HIS HAPLOTYPE IS IRRELEVANT. HIS PERUVIAN HERITAGE ASIDE, LOOK INTO THE EYES OF A CHICAGO SPORTS FAN AND KNOW THAT HE HAS SUFFERED LIFETIMES OF ANGUISH. THE FAILURES OF THE HAM SANDWICH RACE PALE IN COMPARISON TO THE 'DOUBLE DOINK', THE BULLS AFTER THE YEAR 2000, AND THE UNSPEAKABLE TRAUMA OF BEING A CUBS FAN. KNOW THAT I DO NOT SPARE HIM THE JUSTIFIED TRUTH ABOUT HIS GENETICS OUT OF CONCERN, BUT MERELY RESTRAINT; THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL MISERY I NEED TO PLACE UPON A CHICAGO FAN, IT WOULD MAKE ME SEEM WEAK AND OPPORTUNISTIC... LIKE YOU, HAM SANDWICH."

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 months ago

Thank you measurehead

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 40 points 2 months ago

I studied at the disney pixar school of phrenology

[–] tripartitegraph@hexbear.net 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wish I could eyeball measurements this bad. Science would be so easy

[–] LodeMike 17 points 2 months ago

I wish I could

Believe in yourself 🤗

[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 30 points 2 months ago

if they accidentally made me the trans pope i would excommunicate every single us amerikkkan catholic and dispatch the swiss guard to kill them for heresy tbh

[–] muirc@hexbear.net 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait until they find out he has Creole heritage.

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Quick, we gotta figure out his blood quantum!

[–] sweet_pecan@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago

people on tic tok are already going through his family census records lol

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

Believe it or not, this is why cracker support quantum physics now

[–] invo_rt@hexbear.net 28 points 2 months ago
[–] Angel@hexbear.net 22 points 2 months ago

Can't even have a good, faithful Catholic church anymore

because of woke 😤😤😤😤

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago

Skull Check only

No more half measures

[–] Owl@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago

Skull Check only

Somebody inform Shaun.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They literally saw this meme and thought it was legit:

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Do archeologists ever use skulls for gender identification in digs? I suspect it's incredibly unreliable to use as a means of identification due to overlapping variations.

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You can, but it's not an exact science. Any responsible anthropologist calls it a sex estimate because it's not a sure thing. Broadly speaking biologically male skeletons tend to be more robust than biologically female skeletons but there are plenty of exceptions to this "rule".

Edit: ideally you'd also be using other methods for sex estimation and comparing all your results. It's still just an estimate if course because there's plenty of room for interpretation of skeletal remains. Plus obviously biological sex ≠ gender but that should go without saying

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Afaik they use pelvis, though other bones are also used when pelvis is unavailable, this is way less reliable though.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Size itself seems particularly unreliable. Men can be small and women can be large just based on nutrition alone.

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

With the pelvis it's not only size but the shape as well, especially for individuals who have given birth. The pelvis is a more reliable source for sex estimation than the skull, though it is still an educated guess. I would be very suspicious of anyone claiming to be able to determine the sex of any skeletal remains with any degree of certainty

[–] WizardOfLoneliness@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago

talkin' out my dude ass doo doo ass here but I feel like they probably use literally whatever clues they have available including skull size and shape but probably within the context of as many other things as possible

like I think they kinda just do what they can when they have like half of a skull and a middle finger and they gotta figure that shit out

Fun fact, when they exhumed general Pulaski remains, they determied he was a trans man.

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago

What's that ghost rider ass skull for a male

[–] Xenomorph@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

I thought up two derangement syndromes today: there's Rachel Zegler Derangement Syndrome and there's also Everyone I Don't Like Is Secretly Trans Derangement Syndrome. Psychologists of hexbear note, these two often take up space in the average reactionary's head.

[–] inTheShadowOf@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

When the pope is clocky :/

[–] buh@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

Conclave reference???

[–] christian@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

Telling the pope he will never be a real man to own the libs.

[–] sfled@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

LOL, MAGA via the Kremlin.

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 25 points 2 months ago

Yeah sure, chuds in amerikkka never hated LGBT people before this