this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
599 points (98.2% liked)

World News

46717 readers
2330 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Chinese factory employee set fire to a textile plant in China’s southwestern Sichuan province in his frustration over unpaid wages of just 800 yuan (or US$111), according to videos posted on social media and eyewitness accounts shared with Radio Free Asia.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago

Should have just given the man his stapler.

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 38 points 21 hours ago

My dear overworked and underpaid fellow Americans please take notes…

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 10 points 18 hours ago

Where's his picture so we can canonized him like St Luigi.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Should have given him his $111

[–] JoeKis@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago

Fight back!

[–] DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Note that RFA is mentioned as a very bad source in other communities.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

RFA is a literal CIA propaganda outlet. Like directly created and funded by the CIA to spread anti China propaganda.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Free_Asia_(Committee_for_a_Free_Asia)

Radio Free Asia (RFA) was a news agency operated from 1951 to 1955 by the Central Intelligence Agency, through the Committee for Free Asia, to broadcast anti-Communist propaganda.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

Well China is more or less state capitalist now so... Based CIA?

I don't know if I'm joking or not, I hate both the CIA and China so whatever.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Meanwhile most Americans who are forced to work full time with no paid vacation or healthcare instead go off and say, "I don't pay attention to politics, it's depressing. I'm just gonna work on myself," as they accept never being able to afford their dream vacation, their own home, or that new truck they desperately need.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago
[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 72 points 1 day ago

Ummm, based?

[–] literallyacat@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago

What a king

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago
[–] walktheplank@lemmy.world 134 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We (the west) often look at the chinese with some amount of arrogance about them being "peasants".
Truth is, Winnie Pooh has to take some care, because they will fuck things up if their situation gets worse instead of better.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I mean, people who think the Chinese people are just 'peasants' tend to be pretty goddamn ignorant.

Systems are difficult to oppose in every society. We're all just trying to get by.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

ignorant is too light, I say racism, say whatever you want about china, if you see Chinese people as peasants you're a racist POS

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] anzo@programming.dev 1 points 22 hours ago

Peasants? In one of the top capitalist countries?? Haha, good one... They certainly have farms, but that's just one end of the production ..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 114 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"just 800 yuan (or US$111)"

"just"

Fuck man, I'd go ballistic over $111 of unpaid wages, and that's probably a bigger chunk of that employee's monthly wages than mine.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Most payments in China are monthy, not weekly/bi-weekly as with in the west.

You'd be mad too if you find out you're not gonna be paid for work done for the past month*.

Edit: *Or if its only partial payment

[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most payments in China are monthy, not weekly/bi-weekly as with in the west.

Where in "the west" do you live? My paychecks (Switzerland) are definitely monthly.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 hours ago

I only ever heard of North Americans getting paid weekly/bi-weekly as standard.

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 49 points 1 day ago

With west you mean usa? Most of Europe gets paid on a monthly basis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] False@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My first reaction was "That's not very much - guess they should have paid him!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 72 points 1 day ago

We should all strive to be more like this man.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 day ago (11 children)

If the CCP's all about championing the humble worker then surely they'll approve of this guy's actions, right?

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

CCP shuts down alternative unions and prevents any left wing demonstrations, it's ironic, you don't have to fall into a party line when you're not a party member yet they're being hunted down as if they just broke the rules of ~~centralised democracy~~ democratic centralism

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

centralised democracy

I think you mean democratic centralism.

"Centralised democracy" I think would make sense when contrasting parliamentarian vs. direct democracy. None of the ML parties ever implemented democratic centralism but bureaucratic centralism (ie. party leaders decide, base follows). It was never intended to be an organisation principle for a whole country, just a party, OTOH it's a neat way to dress up autocracy as democracy so of course it's been done plenty of times.

Lenin described the SPD as democratically centralist and well, yes, maybe back then. The structures are still in place but the whole party is paralysed when it comes to making decisions so in the end the Seeheimer rule, i.e. the neoliberal wing. It's a rather perverse situation: An actually still lefty base, or at least union people, following a neoliberal vanguard with red paintjob.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Yea brain fart, good catch

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A quick peek at the article doesn’t show any fatalities/injuries, so based?

[–] Rivalarrival -1 points 10 hours ago

No fatalities/injuries means the management team hasn't learned a thing. So, cringe.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Idk. On one hand I really appreciate the energy but on the other hand this is kind of fucked up for everyone else that works there, and I assume there were people inside when he did this. Like what are all his coworkers going to do for work now that the factory is burned down? I know that's part of why capitalism sucks but it's not like they can do anything about it as individuals.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

what are all his co-workers going to do

form a union?

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 0 points 12 hours ago

They’re already in a union, this is China. All companies over a certain size are unionized by law.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Usually that works best before you burn the factory down

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 20 hours ago

There's plenty of other factories that might even pay their workers.

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Burn down the executive's houses?

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Cave Johnson made a lemon for that.

[–] Rivalarrival 1 points 10 hours ago

Burn down the executive~~'s houses?~~.

FTFY.

[–] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

Assumption they were getting paid considering he wasn't

Proletariat Uprising

Power to the people!

To quote the CCP (which is ironic, given they are the oppressors): “革命无罪,造反有理!” (Revolution is not a Crime, Rebellion is Just!)

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

800 yuan to this person could be equivalent to the entire factory for the company

[–] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

The Pingshan county police confirmed an incident of arson and said the arsonist had been detained at the scene of the fire.

A better way to do it is to wait a couple of weeks, burn the place down so it looked like a naturally occurring fire, and not get caught.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago

Just $11? Just? If you need that money, then it's a lot of money to you. But capitalists always use double speak. They could have said that the company was trying to stiff him over a mere $111, which would have been 0.000001% of the company's operating costs.

load more comments
view more: next ›