Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/28150055
[Alt-text] Pikachu Ezra Klein asks Slow King Schumer to "Incrementally improve society by deregulate housing."
Slow King Schumer says, "I'll ask the boss."
Spoink Bill Ackman says, "I'll pay you a million dollars to never do that."
Slow King Schumer says, "I'm so aroused."
Slow King Schumer says, "No."
Pikachu Ezra Klein has a surprised pikachu face.
I don't really see how deregulation is supposed to stop investors from turning living spaces into a speculative asset.
Well, you see, shut up, filthy poor.
When has deregulation ever helped working people?
Maybe they meant zoning laws and parking space requirements. Getting rid of those would help working people a lot.
Changing zoning laws to allow housing near commercial stuff would probably help and count as deregulation I think?
Dallas does this. It creates its own set of problems.
(Almost) the rest of the world also does this, it creates a lot less problems than the zoning laws in most of the USA
deregulation in Texas always leads to worse quality of life. Everyone who runs things in this state since the 90's will take things too far, and leave the mess for the public to live with. I'm sure it works great elsewhere, but here you'll have chemical manufacturerers dumping waste into middle school playgrounds and the state government passing laws to protect the business owners from lawsuits.
This one is just one I personally remember reading about, there are many more such cases
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/12/09/southeast-dallas-shingle-mountain-environmental-racism/
tl;dr: roofing company bought a random lot in a neighborhood and used it as a dumping ground for years and it was all perfectly legal because of Dallas's deregulation.
It won't. But even if it would, billionaires would shut it down wherever someone tried it. They have a shared class interest, the class consciousness, and the money to do so.
Regulation is how you prevent all housing projects being luxury properties intended for speculation.
Homes are being built all the time, they just aren't affordable
They aren't affordable because every contractor out there is being paid by investment firms to build glass steel and marble condos that can be rented out for $4000 a month instead of drywall, wood and laminate ones that can be rented out for $2000.
All of the existing drywall, wood, and laminate ones built 30 years ago are falling apart and no new ones are being built
Starter homes do not exist anymore because no one builds them. Only luxury homes for the boomers to downsize to and pocket their fortunes as they move out of the big city.
Doing capitalism harder won't fix the externalities of capitalism. You rent isn't 50% of you income simply because developers feel disincentivized to build residential.
No but see if we just double down on the perversion the jncentives will circle back to being good.
This meme is about Abundance Liberalism. Unlike the article that I’ll link, I would argue that the center-left Democrats are actual leaning right of center neoliberals who are desperately trying to rebrand themselves so they can keep implementing their failed policies.
The new book Abundance by New York Times and Atlantic writers Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson has taken the center-left intelligentsia by storm this week, as it has received backing from outlets ranging from The Economist to Vox while America’s football coach Tim Walz has even endorsed it to a degree. I have not read the book yet, so I will refrain from entering the weeds of the many policy debates it raises, and if you want to read a critique of those weeds, there are thoughtful ones in The Baffler about how “the Abundance authors ask too little of themselves and their readers” and in The American Prospect about the litany of abundance liberalism’s corporate connections that may be informing its market-based policy recommendations.
Pasting this here too.
Abundance is literally just suggesting that we need to capitalism harder to fix capitalism.
Yes. People internalize the flaws of their society as virtues and then iterate on those flaws to make an even worse society.
We need to point all of this out to people now so our choices in the next two elections aren't neoliberals promoting abundance and fascists. Assuming we still have fair and free elections.
I've worked through the neoliberal talking points I wanted to refute with memes. I'll need to think about some news ideas going forward. Definitely let me know if you have ideas you would like to see drawn. I can link to my other posts if you want examples.
What do people think about cross posting? I meant to post this here so I cross posted it. But in general, I assume that's for other people to do, so the post migrates naturally.