248
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 54 points 6 months ago

The US system is a source a bewilderment to the rest of us.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 45 points 6 months ago

Sorry, we accidentally released a beta democracy into production.

Planned changes include:

  • bugfix: remove unneeded electoral college (slows progress down)
  • bugfix: replace current hard-set limit on House with dynamic value that grows with population
  • feat: add protection for voting rights to system firmware/constitution (current piecemeal legislative approach is difficult to optimize)
  • bugfix: set polling location availability by population density, not population wealth
  • feat: implement ranked-choice election system (deprecates first-past-the-post)
  • feat: implement consequences for criminal actions taken by people who are white and conservative

Unfortunately, these changes are not yet available, but these and more will become possible to implement if we fucking vote like our country depends on it at every level.

[-] bitwise@kbin.social 15 points 6 months ago

I appreciate the well formatted commit message. A shame that some of the maintainers aren't interested in accepting fixes.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

The original spec must be interpreted literally by the letter.

[-] bitwise@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

"The founding maintainers were perfect in every way and their vision doesn't need adjustment!"

"Their vision included the need for adjustment? Nah, that's just propaganda from trolls."

[-] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

And the interpreters can be bought if you're wealthy enough.

[-] vortexsurfer@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

There also seems to be open security vulnerabilities, which could potentially make it possible for a malicious actor to take control of the entire system. Consider implementing some safeguards against that.

[-] bitwise@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

"Working as intended" #wontfix
/closed

[-] SilverCode@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Known issues: sometimes race conditions can cause instability in the system

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

And to us in the US.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

Eh, remove the gun violence and it's just garden-variety corruption.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 32 points 6 months ago

The headline reads like satire.

It's not satire.

[-] Alteon@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Lmfao, he's running as a Democrat. He's going to get crucified by liberals.

John apparently didn't read the conservative memo - crooks, criminals, rapists, pedos, and murderers are supposed to run as a Republican. They love that sort of "quality" candidate - he may have actually had a shot over there.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

You apparently don't know much about Chicago Democrats. They're buddy-buddy with the CPD. The article even mentions that soon-to-be Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot let this guy off the hook in a disciplinary case in a former position she held. This guy will do just fine if he wins the election. Hopefully, reporting on him and his crimes will prevent that, but he won't be stopped by Chicago Dems.

I'm from Chicago. It's a great city in many respects, but its quite racist and the CPD is notoriously so. One of the worst police forces in any major U.S. city.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The Chicago Democratic machine is basically Tammany Hall, for the modern era.

Although I will say that Gov. Rod was railroaded in his prosecution.

[-] Alteon@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I didn't realize Chicago Dems were that bad. That really sucks. Is it just the people in power or the voting populace as well?

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Can't speak for the voting populace. Chicago politics are a freakin' travesty and have been for as long as I've been alive. It's a Blue city and pretty decent on many other political issues, but the PD is ridiculously corrupt and racist, and they've had their fingers on political levers for ages.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's not entirely accurate. The entire Illinois political system is a travesty. Well, unless you're a bagman by trade, then it's a permanent boom town.

[-] oehm@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

There are conservative democrats. The progressives in Chicago are socialist

They never closed that "black-site" in Chicago, did they?

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I fucking hope they did. I haven’t lived in Chicago for years, but I balked when I read about that. What a fucking disgrace. This is why I never liked Lori Lightfoot. I don’t know how you can be a Black politician in Chicago and go light on the CPD over a fucking secret prison. Total garbage.

[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_history_of_Chicago

Yeah. The first two sentences are "Democrats" and "corrupt".

Chicago politics.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Long time one party rule is a guaranteed breeding ground of corruption, no matter the party, but goddamn, the Chicago Democrats are something special.

I think there's even a valid case from the left to accuse them of culturally appropriating large aspects La Cosa Nostra heritage and culture, all while keeping a straight face.

Maybe not Capone, but definitely an argument for Stolen Lansky Valor. All the pencil whipping corruption, but none of the swag.

Swagged out

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

ACAB all the way. Please don't let him near the bench.

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
248 points (98.8% liked)

News

21721 readers
3968 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS