this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
197 points (94.6% liked)

politics

18968 readers
3172 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 70 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Doesn't Swatting endanger peoples lives and waste resources? This is criminal. Hope they find and punish who did it.

Also. The right and MAGA don't like you. In their eyes you are not really one of them because of racism.

[–] Sylver@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

And misogyny, don’t forget the misogyny!

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Doesn’t Swatting...waste resources

Yeah, the same taxpayer dollars they claim to care so much about.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 14 points 8 months ago

Oh taxpayer dollars aren't being wasted as long as the correct people are being hurt.

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

Not that they deserve fairness, but it’s probably not one of her supporters swatting her

It should be an automatic attempted murder charge, even if SWAT realizes it's bogus beforehand. If someone dies as a result, 1st degree murder.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

A serial swatter was just convicted and sentenced in Washington, I think.

He swatted hundreds of people, got 4 years.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The system can't admit that police are dangerous, so it can't treat swatting as the act of terrorism it is.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 68 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't like Haley, and I will absolutely not be voting for her, but I don't subscribe to domestic terrorism as a tactic.

Unless it's directed at Donald Trump, because he would do no less to anyone, and I would bet good money the hoax callers are his sycophants.

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I’m voting for her in a month in my state’s primary. She hasn’t earned my vote, but seeing how much it pisses off Trump is just too fucking good. She won’t win the nomination, but she can absorb his blows for a couple months and it extends the Republican in-fighting.

I would urge everyone to vote for her in your state’s primary. She’s not gonna win the primary, and even if she did, she won’t win a general election because all the Trumper’s are gonna write in Trump

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Haley might win. It's conceivable, though unlikely, that the SC will follow the constitution and ban Donnie from office.

As someone pointed out in a different thread, she is the leading eligible Republican.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 13 points 8 months ago

Beyond that, Trump is also fairly old too, it's not impossible for him to suffer a heart attack or something before the election, in which case the result would be similar of her winning the primary by default as the next most popular candidate. Maybe not likely, but again, possible

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

In a controlled experiment that is bound by the confines of logic, sure. She’s the leading eligible Republican. But in the real world where democracy in America is close to shattering, there’s no way she wins a general. All the prominent Republicans except for the ones who make their wealth off of free trade have endorsed Trump. Everyone in her home state has endorsed Trump. The governor, both senators, every congressman. They would likely flip their endorsements, but this is unprecedented. Trump wouldn’t accept the results. He would blame the RNC, and people like Ramaswamy and Kari Lake would echo his grievances. She won’t win the battleground states that way.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago

But in the real world where democracy in America is close to shattering, there’s no way she wins a general.

I think they were talking about winning the primary if Trump is disqualified.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

She has very little chance of beating Biden if she wins the nomination, but I was writing about the nomination.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

I’m actually switching sides in our state primary just to vote for her and not Trump. I’ll accept whoever is on the democratic side as I’ll vote for them in the general election so I want my vote to go to offset any going to Trump in the primary.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Getting her nominated would split the republican vote, guaranteeing a democrat victory.

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

AND guaranteeing the end of the MAGA/Freedom Caucus/Tea Party/Q Anon movement that has been fucking up US politics since Clinton was in office

[–] hsinner@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

Sadly, I don't think it'll really stop that group. They'll just find another person to rally behind.

[–] jayrhacker@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

domestic terrorism as a tactic

Imagine if we had Police who don't terrorize people based on a phone call directing them to what should be a well known address in their area.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 61 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's absolutely amazing how Republicans can watch this kind of shit happen and still fall in line behind him.

You misunderstand them.

They want this to happen. It brings them joy.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I can't wait to see what happens to the first idiot that tries to swat 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in the general. They're going to find out really quick how efficient the NSA is at monitoring communications.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Someone already tried it. I have intimate knowledge of DCs various communications networks and can tell you that the FBI is watching you whoever you are.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Watching? Like, with popcorn? Let's do something...

[–] gullible@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

Popcorn is banned since the Havana incident. But yes, let’s get crazy, fellow dissident. jaja

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You never know. They may be looking for contacts, larger charges, etc.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You dodged the question, is there popcorn or no‽

TELL US IF THEY MICROWAVE OR STOVE POP IT YOU JACK BOOTED STATE THUG!!!!!

[–] Desistance@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

The MAGA crowd is terrified of her. Good.