this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
364 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

1377 readers
78 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

NTSB: Boeing "unable to find the records documenting" repair work on 737 Max 9.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Splatterphace@lemm.ee 89 points 8 months ago

I'll take "Obvious Cover-ups" for $500, Alex.

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 80 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Who had “Boeing leverages their too-big-to-fail status to cover up gross negligence and murder” on their worst timeline bingo card?

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Goddamnit! I had Lockheed for murder and Raytheon for gross negligence

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 21 points 8 months ago
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You should have had those the other way around anyway, since Raytheon does a lot of the US missile work.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

That’s why it wouldn’t be a scandal for them

[–] bibliotectress@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not like I thought Boeing were one of the "good guys," but this is all blowing my mind.

[–] nepenthes@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Pretty terrifying Doc on NF about Boeing called Downfall: The Case Against Boeing

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

We could eliminate 90% of air travel if business people could use zoom and email.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 73 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So if you don't have any records then you can't prove it was done properly and the assumption should be on the fault of Boeing.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's not their way, you must respect local culture.

The way over there is to give big moneys to Boeing, in this case 'for quality assurance', but pretend to forget to attach meaningful strings. Then Boeing must use all of that money for stock buybacks, as custom dictates. Anything other than that would be considered impolite. As a further sign of respect and gratitude Boeing can also fire a few % of their workforce.

[–] thechadwick@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

As is tradition.

[–] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago

Boeing murdered the whistleblower!

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's why they had to kill the whistle blower, he knew where the video was

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He was in the middle of the testimony when he died. That is a more likely reason.

He quit Boeing long before the accident aircraft was built and delivered to the airline, let alone repaired.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Obviously he was saving the really damning info for after they suicided him.

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Woopsie!

South Park “we’re sorry” image goes here

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.ml 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I can’t speak for their specific regulations, but setting that data retention to only 24 hours because you don’t want to have evidence of culpability stored for a long time is a good way to go.

[–] GombeenSysadmin@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

As someone who works in aircraft maintenance, I am actually shocked by this. Forget the video footage, that’s just a cheap-assed commercial camera somewhere in the rafters. But the paperwork?

As a repair station, we have to document every single step of every single task. If a mechanic does it, he signs that he has done it and an inspector checks and countersigns that he has done it correctly. For a single aircraft input, this is upwards of 50,000 signed task steps. We have to hand all that data to the customer when it is complete, and also keep it for a minimum of 7 years for most stuff, some things in perpetuity.

If Boeing couldn’t provide the exact names and dates involved within a 5 minute search, then someone has already found it and destroyed it.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 22 points 8 months ago

When does the FAA start grounding 737's or all Boeing planes?

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Boeing is collapsing from internal rot, really sad to see

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, no, no - its their planes that do that.

The company is considered successful only by this one metric apparently:

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, Boeing does suck compared to the market in their one metric, too Their stock is basically moving sideways since the extreme low at the start of the pandemic and the stock is basically going down since the 737 MAX grounding in March 2019. Boeing is in crisis mode for 5 years now

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Yes, this is true.

But full on crisis management, faulty products, and a major new problem and/or incident every year would make you think its not 100 billion company anymore.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Not sad at all. Fuck the war crime industrial complex.

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

And they'll get away with it because they've got a serious amount of lobbying power.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

CCTV cameras have a surprisingly short recording time before they record over themselves. With cheap disk storage, you'd think they could record for weeks and weeks before overwriting.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

For large corporations, keeping recordings for a long period is common.

I was at Sprint retail back in 2010 when information was leaked by a coworker at my retail store. The internal security team that came to the store less than a week after the leak, had recordings from the cameras 6 months prior that they were referencing when talking to all of us.

A small business may only be keeping camera recordings for maybe a month on a local DVR, but a corporation with their own data centers are going to keep those a lot longer. ESPECIALLY a government contractor where the logging requirements are much more stringent.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 2 points 8 months ago

There is even a line of hard drives specifically made cheap and dense for security footage.

[–] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world -5 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I will never fly again. Never. Fuck flying. We were never meant to be in the air, comment if you are with me!

[–] meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Just fly Airbus. Or Embraer. Or Bombardier. It’s still safer than driving by far.

[–] cryostars@lemmyf.uk 4 points 8 months ago

Dealing with airports and flying is a miserable experience but is unfortunately the best way overall to travel overseas/very long distances (obviously highly dependent on where in the world you are located/where you are traveling to). I avoid flying except for maybe a trip every five years where there really isn't another viable alternative. High ticket costs, crowded aitports, TSA, all the waiting with delays in boarding, taxi'ing, de-boarding etc. really just make the juice not worth the squeeze for me.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

I fully agree with you, you should not fly, since that means there will be one less person to deal with in the airport / on the plane.

[–] Syn_Attck 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Aye, I'm taking my next weekend trip from NY to Cali via car. Or by boat the kmking way around. Fuck planes!