this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
1123 points (99.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26821 readers
2863 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In b4 someone tells me 6 isn't out yet

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 110 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Simplifying the most recent scroll bar feels like a huge step backwards to me. It really is the epitome of modern tech needlessly boiling down to its basic visual aspects to emulate a "clean" environment for the users.

Give me back my scroll bar texture damnit

[–] Switorik@lemmy.zip 59 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This. Holy shit is it frustrating to click a pixel wide scroll bar that is on the edge between two monitors. It's even worse when they disappear.

[–] aksdb@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago

Not just scrollbars. Buttons, input fields, etc.

Dammit I sometimes have to search for elements I can interact with. Back in the day it was self explaining.

[–] axsyse@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I recently had a complaint with a website:

"Users are having trouble scrolling!"

My response:

"Are they using the scroll wheel/directly scrolling with the touchpad, or using the scroll bar?"

They were, of course, using the scroll bar. I am now somehow responsible for design choices made at the level of the browser, because browsers have decided that the scroll bar should be nigh impossible to use. Yippee.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago

What really chuffs my spuds is when the application decides they want to provide their own UI rather than using the system default.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago (3 children)

UIs get worse all the time, very frustrating. Who needs contrast, right? I have good eyes and know exactly where to look. My mother? Holy shit no chance.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Not necessarily for visibility but when i work I NEED FUCKING BORDERS FOR MY FUCKING BRAIN TO KEEP FUCKING STRUCTURE AND NOT EVERYTHING FADING OUT INTO ..yeah thanks i lost the thread again

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seriously fuck Wikipedia's desktop redesign, I regret that I donated before the change

[–] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In case you weren't aware, there are extensions that you can use to restore the older (better) UIs. Here are a couple:

There are probably some for other browsers as well. I don't use them though. I instead wrote myself a tampermonkey script to change it:

if (!window.location.search.contains('useskin')) {
  var new_url = window.location.protocol
      + "//" + window.location.hostname
      + window.location.pathname;
  if (window.location.search == "") {
    new_url = new_url + "?useskin=monobook";
  } else {
    new_url = new_url + window.location.search + "&useskin=monobook";
  }
  new_url = new_url + window.location.hash;
  window.location.replace(new_url);
}

You can compare the available wikipedia styles on this page to see which one you like best: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Skin?useskin=monobook

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

Yeah, and I do that, I just don't think I should have to. I should be able to open the website on a fresh install and not get nauseous using it.

[–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At least on the bright side, people are becoming much more aware of accessibility. I'd argue that old sites were accessible mainly on accident due to most being restricted to fairly straightforward CSS and HTML. The advent of Javascript was a dark time...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's really depressing how often I have to turn off CSS entirely just to view a webpage. I could of course always go into the inspector and turn off the bad CSS, but Gecko-based browsers fortunately have "View -> Page Style -> No Style" which is must easier and faster.

And seriously, whoever invented the font-weight CSS property can burn in hell. Ditto for whoever decided that we should only be allowed to read light grey text on slightly lighter grey background.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Its the epitome of technology that as it improves some things become obsolete.

Pretty much every mouse has a scroll wheel on them now. I very seldom click on a scroll bar now. So the design has changed with that consideration in mind.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago (6 children)

It's a design choice, not a question of obsolescence. If it were, we'd be talking about their decision on removing the scroll bar, not changing it.

At the very least the style change could have been optional.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rayf@lemmy.zip 74 points 8 months ago

The elder scrolls, online

[–] RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee 63 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Anyone else hate the trend of removing arrow buttons?

[–] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 31 points 8 months ago

I hated the trend of flat buttons. Then they removed the buttons. Then they basically removed the entire scrollbar altogether.

At this point, I'd happily go back to the age of flat buttons. That's how bad things have gotten....

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

I am not a fan of the general trend of de-buttoning.

Like... isn't the entire point to make things consistent and intuitive? Make a clickable button visually distinct!

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 24 points 8 months ago (4 children)

What I hate is how in Firefox in Linux I only have these tiny "slim" scrollbars that hide when not in use.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm sure you can disable that behaviour

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aasikki@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Someone actually uses those?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago (1 children)

2024, scrollbars? What scrollbars? We decided that you don't need them. Sorry but your adblocker and script blocking, broke our own shitty implementation of scrolling. Please enable all scripts for our large ad family to feast on your data.

[–] Waffelson@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I really hate sites that change scrolling It always looks weird and uncomfortable. Who thinks this is a good idea?

[–] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Search engine optimizers.
If you spend more time on a site, it looks higher value, so they do everything to increase the time you need to find the info you came for.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 50 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I like 1998 the most. Easy on the eyes and doesn't distract from the content that would appear on the side, but has enough pop to indicate that it can be interacted with.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For me it's the XP scrollbars that do it for me, cause I was sick and tired of the BSoDs I got during the Win9x era (especially in WinMe). I couldn't wait to get a PC with the newer OS as a teen. It was considerably more stable for me (especially after SP2).

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I yearn to return to 1998.

[–] vampire@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Just install linux and change your gtk/qt theme. It's that easy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

It's easily the best option on this image. Nothing else even comes close in terms of visual clarity and simple aesthetics.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 31 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm not a huge fan of the flat button aesthetic. Give me the 3D-esque buttons and the translucent Aero window frames of Windows Vista.

Our GPUs, even the integrated ones, are powerful enough for it now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] joe_cool@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago

And disappears and reappears without rhyme or reason like it's possessed.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I miss visible, usable scroll bars. Now they're replaced with… nothing, because we want everything to be invisible while keeping a lot of empty space in modern designs, it seems.

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 7 points 8 months ago

My favorite is that you can't see if content is actually off screen sometimes. No scrolbar to indicate and often those clean lines just look like the end of the content. Horrible

[–] nom_nom@lemmy.ml 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Combining 2006 and 2009 would be ideal. High contrast etc.

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I actually prefer 1988, the haven't managed to improve it at all

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 15 points 8 months ago

It worked well in 1988, but in a world of dark mode UIs you can’t tell which is the highlighted area without contour shading.

[–] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Did anyone ever rock Windows Longhorn when they were developing vista?

[–] Raptor_007@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Yep, I sure did. For quite a while too, as I recall. I think I was too scared to move to it permanently and dual-booted with WinXP. First time I saw the status bar of a copy or install processing and seeing it do the …rolling colors in the filled in portion I thought something was wrong. I was used to a static status bar where it just filled in and didn’t do anything fancy.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

I remember Windows XP coming out and we all mocked it as Windows but with an interface by Crayola. But I'd gladly have that Crayola interface back rather than the flat modern crap we have now.

[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

It's definitely the superior scroll bar.

[–] Flashback956@feddit.nl 11 points 8 months ago

I used all of them, I'm feeling old now.

[–] slingstone@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And now I'm blind. Thanks!

[–] mossy_@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

You should've known better, the moth priests have to train for years to use these

[–] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

In 2012, Tiber Septim achieved Chim and erased the scrollbar textures.

load more comments
view more: next ›