684
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 34 points 5 months ago

"Best generals available" might be a bit of a stretch. That's a bit of the Lost Cause mythology still wrattling about the internet.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 26 points 5 months ago
[-] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Lee almost took it too, he didn't want to secede but he felt like he was betraying his fellow statesmen in Virginia. People forget that before the civil war people didn't think of themselves as Americans, they thought of themselves as citizens of whatever state they were from.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

From what I've read, before the War people said "...the United States are..." and after they changed it to "...the United States IS..."

Also, I like the stories that the British had agents who privately encouraged the South to fight the North in order to keep America weak. Putin didn't invent anything new

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

From what you've read in.. the script of National Treasure?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

On the contrary, I think your comment is a bit of a stretch in the other direction. Leaving variances in talent among individuals aside, the officers on both sides were broadly comparable because they had all gone through the same West Point training and were colleagues in the same chain of command, with the same strategy and doctrine, until the Southern ones turned traitor.

[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I haven't seen that part disputed? To my knowledge there was a very good reason Lee was the superintendent at the US Military Academy and was even offered a Union command before Virginia seceded, and this pattern holds with his underlings too. A lot of Confederate victories were beating odd against bigger Union armies.

[-] DangedIfYouDid@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

When the upper threshold for greatness available to you is a 3/10, a 2.5 looks pretty good.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I understood that pro-union misinformation and propaganda and poor understanding of history is orders of magnitude less harmful than pro-confederate, but it still bothers me. Lee was an incredible general. Jackson, Longstreet, even Early were excellent tacticians. The union could not field anyone who was a match for them until Grant and Sherman.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I love "wrattling". kind of a wrestling-meets-defective-machinery.

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Wasn't their general first helping to lead the Union army before Virginia turned against the Union and he turned with them?

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Lee was offered comman of the union army by Lincoln.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

That part of the mythos is fairly accurate.

[-] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Well it doesn't help it any that "lost cause" is 100% what some of our elected officials are spouting currently

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Cause_of_the_Confederacy#:~:text=The%20Lost%20Cause%20of%20the,and%20not%20centered%20on%20slavery.

this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
684 points (97.0% liked)

politics

18075 readers
2685 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS