this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
567 points (98.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26812 readers
2848 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 137 points 5 months ago
[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 5 months ago

“This will teach people to stop holding me accountable for what I support!”

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 58 points 5 months ago

I bet the change is due to the fact that despite his bot armies he's getting ratioed lately.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Idk why people wouldn't just make anonymous accounts. Then you can say whatever

[–] Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With every Elon article about him making changes to Twitter, I'm shocked there are any users left.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Real Empty Internet Theory hours, given how much of that site is flooded with bots.

Like, even when there is an active community, its punctuated with so many ads and spam account posts that real interactions are the exception rather than the rule.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The people that they are likely changing this policy for are high enough up in the social hierarchy that they can't be arsed to have more than one account, that's too much work for them and those same people are also likely the ones that are giving them money which means that he has a direct incentive to do this

[–] LazyBane@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

My conspiracy theory on this is that Twitter Blue isn't doing well so they're doubling down on ad revenue.

Public likes disincentvise interactions, which is one metric that could be used to measure engagement, so hiding likes, along side their recent policy changes about NSFW stuff, is a way to encourage more engagement towards attention grabbing content that users were otherwise not inclined to interact with.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

On the flip side of that coin, being able to see what other people like Embraces interaction because you can look at a like list see who else liked that post and then by doing so you're interacting with that post as well, where with the new system there's no longer an incentive to interact with a post unless you find it entertaining. Which I fully agree with I just think it's going to lower their overall engagement metrics

[–] FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What were the recent NSFW policy changes?

[–] LazyBane@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Basically it's allowed but they must properly mark it as NSFW, so it can be filtered out for minors and people who are actively trying to avoid it. More or less they're making the sharing of adult material a more legitimate thing for twitter, which is kinda hard to tell because twitter has always been filled with porn but I guess it's just more official.

Wherever or not people will actually mark their content as NSFW or if Twitter will enforce it is in the air. I've seen Twitter content sensitivity setting used more for video game spoilers than it's actual intended use.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So, it'll be harder to tell when someone is buying likes from bots? Because that sounds like what muskrat intends to do in order to boost his shit ego

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Why even bother with bots? Since the like list will no longer be public they can just literally code it to artificially inflate the system to boost propaganda in the way that they want to make. Or you were able to see who was liking it so you could verify those an actual person behind it, now you can't.

With this new system there's nothing stopping a comment from being sent to the Moon likewise with only one person actually liking it ex. Musks social posts can have 80,000 likes where as only 10,000 actually liked it.

Who needs to spend money on engagement on the platform when you can fake the engagement and get the same results because members will be like oh there's a lot of people interacting with this and will interact with it as well when in reality there isn't actually much interaction with it

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

I don't think they can alter the number of likes received willy-nilly without attributing 1 like to 1 account, and I'm basing this thought on how a normal system would behave, as I suspect xitter still uses the equivalent of a select count(has_liked) from user_post_reaction where id_post = {whatever}; -- Changing how a normal count of likes work, without attributing them to accounts, would easily fuck up xitter real hard.

Sure, melon himself wants to believe his own delusions, but there's a lot of people that aren't him and that don't have access to the code, or the coders, and definitely want to find ways to abuse this.

[–] ViscloReader@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (3 children)

So what's the point of liking anymore? Like at some point it's gonna be a single player platform requiring online data gathering

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 5 months ago

Probably just for the algorithm, but then again I don't know much about how Twitter actually works.

I never cared for the idea of telling the world when I'm going to take a shit or some other completely pointless thing nor do I care to see when Major Company takes a shit either.

[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I am assuming that likes will be visible on a tweet but you can't look through a specific user's likes unless they allow it? Seems like a decent change tbh

[–] pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 months ago

Back in the day there were only re-tweets and bookmarks. Then Facebook likes became popular and Twitter changed bookmarks which could be private or public into fully public likes. So annoying. Likes should have never existed on Twitter.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

At this point, if you're still posting on Twitter then you're suspect. That site's subtag might as well be "PUSSY IN BIO", we all know why you're there.

[–] RandomGuy79@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I assume this is so we can all publicly like porn

[–] TurdMongler@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Wonder when he will announce X becoming a bank

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Someone set a timer, how long will it be before they reverse that change. VISA has been very open about not wanting to be involved with anything that is NSFW, and about time Visa reaches out and says yo we're pulling the plug on your usage of our services it's going to reverse