this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
196 points (96.7% liked)

News

23311 readers
3610 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The FDA said it had concluded that BVO was not safe for use after the results of studies, it conducted in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health, found the potential for adverse effects in humans.

The agency had first proposed to revoke the regulation in November 2023. According to the Center for Science in the Public Interest, BVO was banned in the UK in 1970, followed by India in 1990, the EU in 2008 and Japan in 2010.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 38 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The Food and Drug Administration said on Tuesday it would revoke the regulation that authorized the use of brominated vegetable oil in food items, effective Aug. 2, as it was no longer safe.

BVO is a chemical ingredient containing bromine, which is found in fire retardants. Small quantities of BVO are used legally in some citrus-flavored drinks in the United States to keep the flavor evenly distributed.

The FDA said it had concluded that BVO was not safe for use after the results of studies, it conducted in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health, found the potential for adverse effects in humans.

The agency had first proposed to revoke the regulation in November 2023. According to the Center for Science in the Public Interest, BVO was banned in the UK in 1970, followed by India in 1990, the EU in 2008 and Japan in 2010.

In 1970, the FDA had concluded that its use in food was not generally recognized as safe because of toxicity concerns. After this, the agency began regulating BVO as a food additive, while simultaneously conducting safety studies.

“The FDA’s new regulation to not allow BVO as a food additive is a terrific positive in the right direction,” said Michael Ashley Schulman, chief investment officer at Running Point Capital Advisors.

As per FDA rules, whenever a company was using the ingredient in any product, it was necessary to list it on the label.

Over time, many beverage makers have replaced BVO with an alternative ingredient, according to the FDA. “Today, few beverages in the U.S. contain BVO,” it said.

PepsiCo and Coca-Cola have removed BVO from their drinks such as Gatorade and Fanta, respectively.

“Sun Drop, manufactured by Keurig Dr Pepper, still uses BVO ... This is probably the biggest national brand that still uses it,” said CFRA Research’s Arun Sundaram.

Keurig Dr Pepper did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 31 points 4 months ago

followed by India in 1990

India, a country considerably more blasé about safety standards than the US, had already banned it a generation ago. Terrifying negligence on behalf of the FDA. How much money could this have possibly saved the megacorps?

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

no longer safe

It used to be safe?

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Considered safe. Considerations are influenced by adequate research, ideally.

Lead used to be considered safe in paint, asbestos used to be considered safe for napkins, cigarettes used to be considered safe to smoke, cocaine used to be considered safe to drink, etc.

I am just waiting for the next "asbestos" to come to light in home construction. I am betting on drywall sooner or later being considered hazmat to disturb. Plastics are emerging as a bigger problem, so we will see how that all pans out.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Lead used to be considered safe in paint

It's worse than that. Ancient Romans knew that lead could poison you and no one ever forgot. They all kept using it anyway because lead was cheap.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Romans even knew about asbestos, there were recommendations to not buy slaves from the asbestos mines because of the poor health associated.

Oddly enough, they still wiped their faces with the stuff because those napkins and towels could be cleaned by throwing them in fire.

[–] Sidhean@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Okay but that is a very cool way to clean napkins

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 months ago

Lead is still used as a gasoline additive for some applications. It was only banned for sale for on road vehicles in the 90s. Prior to 1975 just about every car on the road was spewing it from the tail pipe.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Then we put it in gasoline knowing damn well that the poisionous lead would spew out the exhaust, it took us decades to reverse that decison as well and it only really happened when engine knocking had been resolved.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Even now, it's legal in aviation fuel.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

At least its not idling in the school parking lot anymore where children are closer to the exhausts and less aware of the risks.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the article left out the word, “considered”

or the FDA did

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Everything that the FDA doesn't declare as "known" or "proven" safe within defined limits are "considered" safe or may be allowable to a defined limit. It is their cute little scapegoat should a substance they allow be proven unsafe and then they would face a greater risk of lawsuit had they determined it was known or proven safe.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AceCephalon@pawb.social 1 points 4 months ago

Citrine red text flashbacks

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Again, the FDA was late to the game. Even India has banned this stuff decades ago.

[–] Qkall@lemmy.ml 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I always find this a little funny... Like I always hear complaints how the FDA is overbearing and stuff... And I'm like, they're barely doing their job. They're so woefully backed that even if they make a ruling, they act super slow or are unable to enforce. That said... Lots of moves happening from them after the baby formula stuff. It'll be interesting how the next year or two goes

[–] Laser@feddit.org 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I always find this a little funny... Like I always hear complaints how the FDA is overbearing and stuff

It's big corpos who'd love to continue using these additives that launch these claims via proxy into the public. Similar to how McDonald's made sure people think the US is a country of frivolous lawsuits because they were ordered to cover a woman's medical costs after a jury found them guilty. Purposeful misrepresentation of facts

[–] Qkall@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

While I don't doubt nor deny this happens (looking at you 3M), but I will say from experience, a lot of the bigger corps push themselves to exceed food safety standards. Well at least, in my experience in the food biz ... Granted I'm more in the luxurious sector. But yeah, since 2008 we've been well beyond what is being asked... Mostly for perception, but overall for financial reasons. In general a food safety incident costs about 10 mil (average anyway). Like we've been testing for heavy metals well before I started ... And now that's a big thing being tested for and such. The FDA sets a pretty low bar... Most of their actions tend to be reactionary.

Again, not saying I disagree, just stating my one point of data from my anecdotal experience.

[–] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

a lot of the bigger corps

The problem is we as the public don't know which ones do and which ones don't. And even if we did, it's nigh impossible to keep track of which products are from which company.

[–] Qkall@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trying to keep myself out of trouble... But I have in one way or another have dealt with most big corps. The ones that scare me the most are the mom and pop shops that lack the infrastructure for a regulatory group. Like a team dedicated on keeping up with all the various changes both locally and globally since... As you mentioned products do ship and it's hard to track where things come from. And I think that's why I tend to trust these larger entities (now anyway). They have to deal with global regulations and not just the FDA stuff. That said, the FDA just ruled out a mandate on traceability standards for 2026. But to your point, I'm not sure how public this will be as it seems like it would lay out a companies supply chain and customer base...which are considered trade secrets.

I guess time will tell.

I wanna be clear, I'm not really a fanboi, it's just something I'm surrounded by with my current role and wanted to share my experiences while not sharing anything that would get me in trouble.... I need that check y'all 🥺

No no, I mean, I get your point about how most corps do try to keep up with regulations. But some bad apples certainly spoil the batch. Even within corps I'm sure there are differences from one dept to another.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

India doesn’t have the Robert’s court.

The FDA means nothing. Agencies are pointless now. The whole thing is a joke.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Cue the lawsuit to be able to continue using it.

[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, weren't the implications from the Chevron case that the FDA wouldn't be able to ban ingredients anymore? I thought the government departments were all basically stripped of powers and could only make recommendations to Congress.

Got to go read, now, and figure out what I misunderstood...

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

They can continue operating until the courts stop them. Chevron deference is in reference to court cases, not specific regulatory authority. So the Chevron doctrine was that courts should defer to the regulatory agency in most cases. With it gone, courts can generally rule against specific regulations without fear of being over turned on appeal.

The real danger is SCOTUS in another case in the last few days completely removed something called standing in relation to these regulations. It used to be that you could only challenge a new rule or regulation right after it was made. Now you can challenge it when the damage occurs. That sounds better but in reality it's worse. Because corporations can act as people in court, all you have to do is incorporate a new corporation in a friendly court district. For example, the second you create a "alcohol distribution" corporation you are subject to those regulations. Some of them are a hundred years old. You can now claim damage has occurred and sue to block the enforcement of those regulations.

Before Chevron was removed though the courts would have most likely ruled against you because the agency was deferred to in most cases. Now the court can take this shell company's case and rule however it wants.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Mountain Dew used to be made with this... I wonder what it does to you

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The FDA knew it wasn't safe in 1970.

Okay new rule. If it's not naturally grown and simply processed, (squeezing an orange) it has to go to the FDA for FDA led testing and cannot be distributed until then.

If that's already the case then we need to see some criminal prosecutions. I'm getting really fucking tired of these captured regulators.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

Oranges aren't squeezed anyway. They're separated into tanks of raw components and then mixed so OJ always tastes the same.

[–] Rinna@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Great, now lets ban teflon next.

[–] thecookie94@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just banning PTFE outright isn't gonna go well, it just has way too many useful applications. As a lubricant for example (tho fully enclosed uses there are def preferred obviously), or for uses where the fact that it's practically non-reactive is very much important. Phasing out PTFE coatings for non stick pans&things like that? Sure, that we can do. Basically.... reduce it's use to applications where it actually makes sense to do so&where there is no such thing as a practical "just use something else that doesn't share the same environmental issues!"

[–] Rinna@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I'm aware there are legitimate uses for it, I meant around foodstuff since it's not something that should be anywhere near it. I probably should've specified better. 😅

[–] thecookie94@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago
[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I feel the same way about diamonds. They are fantastic for tools and abrasives, but everyone wearing it should be hit over the head with a teflon pan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] codeddji@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I could find these drinks two after digging in to 2 differnet articles :

  1. Sun Drop, made by Keurig Dr Pepper  2. Great Value Orangette orange soda ( Walmart brand )
[–] Svengarlic@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Half asleep, read that as "Great Value Orange Vinaigrette Soda". Was shocked at the depth of Walmart's depravity.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 2 points 4 months ago

I remember it being in Mountain Dew Live Wire as well.

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Surprised it took this long, frankly.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wait, does this mean Sunny D will have to be made from real oranges from now on?!

[–] Steve@communick.news 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Small quantities of BVO are used legally in some citrus-flavored drinks in the United States to keep the flavor evenly distributed.

No, you'll just have to shake it before drinking.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Whew. I can't imagine any Sunny D consumer being satisfied with a real orange flavor.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Now where am I gonna get my bromine

[–] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

You're going to have to drink indoor pool water like the rest of us. It has all the bromine you'll need, and more!

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 months ago

Also annoying that articles like these never list the full list of affected beverages. We can't have a negative taint against our dear corporations!

load more comments
view more: next ›