this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
-57 points (13.9% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2561 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Really stretching to find something that people support him over, aren't you, Newsweek.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Instead of ending taxes on tips, expand the lowest tax bracket, pay a living wage, and get rid of tips entirely.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Or do both. Can't really think of a good reason why tips should be taxed. They're a major source of income for some of the lowest income workers. Which makes me incredibly doubtful we'd ever see such a measure passed by Republicans as it doesn't benefit billionaires in any way.

In a perfect world we wouldn't have tips as a significant source of income for anybody, but until we achieve that this actually sounds like a decent idea. Would be fucking hilarious if Kamala said "You know, that's not a bad idea, I'll pledge to do the same", really take the last bit of wind out of Trump's sails.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Can't really think of a good reason why tips should be taxed.

If you can't think of how not taxing tips could be abused by people to get out of paying taxes, you don't have a good imagination.

Raising the lowest tax bracket has the effect of removing the tax on the poorest while also not opening up a loophole that would be abused to avoid taxes.

In a perfect world we wouldn't have tips as a significant source of income for anybody, but until we achieve that this actually sounds like a decent idea.

Except it would further cement tipping into the culture by giving tipped earners additional incentives to keep tips around. Raising the bracket doesn't do that, and would help more people that need help than just tipped earners

[–] echo@lemmings.world 1 points 3 months ago

Ask Ronald Reagan... that is his legacy.

[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sounds great, but probably not gonna happen so why not have the next best thing and let people keep more of the money they make

[–] echo@lemmings.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It won't actually make much difference... some huge percentage of tips never get reported and taxed in any case. It also treats the symptom instead of the problem. I have no problem with incremental improvements, but this really doesn't improve anything. You'll also find rich people now 'tipping' huge sums, so it will be a net negative.

[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Most of my gf's money comes from tips and it's setup to make it very hard to not report tips without getting fired and she would bring in quite a bit more money without being taxed on it

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 3 points 3 months ago

Wouldn't it be great if the corporate loophole that forces your gf to take and report tips was closed and she earned a livable wage directly from her employer instead of relying on people's kindness to meet her needs financially?

Or do you just really want trump to have a single opinion that seems approachable at face value?

[–] wildflower@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Or... (novel idea I know) you could pay your workers so they wont have to rely on handouts

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Beyond that. It's just mental that we treat tipped jobs like that in the first place. No other jobs are expected to be paid at starvation wages and only be able to make in with me through the kindness of strangers. Generally the people in that situation are homeless or unemployed. Not working full time.

A tip for a gratuity is supposed to be for treatment above and beyond the standard. If you're a restaurant relying on people to pay 10% extra than the cost of a meal or more to their server in order to actually pay for them. You just need to charge that much more for the cost of a meal and pay the employee. I would gladly pay 10% more if I knew that it meant the employee would have security. And that I would not worry or question whether or not the tip I left was enough.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The US President can’t change tax law though - weird that Newsweek doesn’t even mention that.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

That would reduce copypasta sales.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Weird how Republicans celebrate when a Republican does something progressive. It's almost as if Americans like progressive policies. The right has just convinced a large portion of Americans that it's Socialism or a "hand-out". Usually the right is talking about flat taxes for the rich and the working class alike OR switching to sales tax only that way the poor are taxed on every penny they spend (which is most of it) and the rich who stockpile their wealth get taxed on almost none of it. This is only notable because he's on the right.

As usual, the right is judged on their best and the left is judged on their worst.

If you like this and want progressive taxes that work for the working class instead of against them, vote blue. Or better yet, vote progressive.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Oppress your working class, but make sure to tip them well.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com -5 points 3 months ago

What's the lie? You don't think people back the idea of keeping more of their tip money?

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don’t. I’d like to see us moving away from tipping culture in general, and this would make it harder.

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Of course Republicans agree with it: they don't tip and they steal their tipped-workers' tips. Now they'd like their theft to also not be taxed.

[–] signalsayge@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would agree with this except that I don't have faith that it won't be leveraged as a way to get out of a whole crapload of taxes. I'm pretty sure that unemployment insurance, and a lot of the federal taxes, are based on wages and not tips. Also what is the limit? Can I pay my friend $50 to mow my lawn and tip him an extra $25,000, just so I can get around the limit for a gift tax? I wouldn't trust a Republican administration to implement this without making it easier for Rick people to avoid paying taxes.

[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com -5 points 3 months ago

Mowing a lawn for 25k? Sounds like you need better friends bud

[–] echo@lemmings.world 1 points 3 months ago
[–] echo@lemmings.world 1 points 3 months ago

Maybe we should talk about the history behind taxing tips...and Social Security checks. Hint: it was Ronald Reagan and he raised them to pay for cutting taxes for the wealthy and corporations

https://www.upi.com/Archives/1983/02/05/New-Internal-Revenue-Service-rules-for-reporting-tips-have/9750413269200/?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago

Newsweek - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Newsweek:

MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.newsweek.com/americans-back-donald-trump-tips-tax-1933665
~Media~ ~Bias~ ~Fact~ ~Check~ ~|~ ~bot~ ~support~