this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
1003 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18821 readers
4888 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 232 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Funny but 400 posts with #TrumpIsACoward and 16500 with #Trump2024 . It really just shows how unpopular truth social is more than anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 152 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He is indeed a coward. He is also far too old.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 99 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And apparently he smells weird too

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's from all the poopy diapers. And I wish I was making that up.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not only does Trump wear poopy diapers, but when that fact was revealed in court his ~~supporters~~ cult members started wearing diapers too:

Donald Trump supporters wore diapers at rallies in spring 2024, holding signs that said "Real men wear diapers."

Edit: typo

[–] vistencluse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

reality is far more absurd than any parody could even manage at this point

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 117 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When danger reared its ugly head, he bravely turned his tail and fled

[–] Jeanschyso@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That reads like a Terry Pratchett joke

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Or like a Monty Python sketch.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Was that a swallow flying over their head?

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The brave Sir Robin!

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And there was much rejoicing. Yay!

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago

A strategic full speed ahead in the opposite direction

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 115 points 1 month ago (3 children)

He ran away from a debate and tried to start a new one. What a wimp.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What a ~~wimp~~.

What a baby!

he clearly hates being called a baby so we should use that more often ;)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChaoticCookie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

What a weirdo

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Whatta weird loser

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 82 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I sense ketchup splattered walls and a wildly swinging ban-hammer in the near future.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'll be happy when that "man" can't afford ketchup at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 71 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Trump must be calling Elon to check what to do

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

"Flush Truth down the Xitter"

[–] paf0@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They both call Peter Thiel

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah but his only advice is to harvest the blood of your children to prevent aging.

Stock market advice? Invest in blood transfusions

Dating advice? Blood transfusions make you look young and sexy

High cholesterol? More blood

Low potassium? More blood

Too much blood? Weirdly enough, also blood transfusion.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Maybe the billionaires are finally figuring out that having the Dynamite Monkey for president is bad for business.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He doesn't want to get fact checked.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago

He couldn't care less about that, he doesn't want to look weak getting manhandled by a woman because then his bullshit strongman thing dissolves.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago (1 children)

FTFY: ~~Truth~~ Weird Social

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Always has been.

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So, is it trolls or are his followers starting to drop?

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most of the internet's organized troll groups are already the ones pushing right wing narratives (even when those right wing narratives come with a thin coat of red paint.) Truth social is definitely infested with trolls, but they are the kind trying to get Trump elected. A mutiny on his own platform would almost certainly have to be organic.

[–] RootAccess@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not to be "that guy" who doesn't trust everything he reads on the internet, but... what credible sources are saying that "most of the internet troll groups are ... pushing right wing narratives? I wonder how they would track such a thing.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You'll get the hang of detecting paid trolls (or peoplec onvinced by them), there are lots of signs like Never back down, change the narrative (die hard people do not often do that), has lots of info that is somewhere in betweed what you are discussing and line USAbad/Russia_china-not-bad, Always lean onto one side, even if it's subtle... sometimes not.

And dude are they 99% pro dictators/trump/anti-demicracy/... you get the idea.

For example, people calling out Biden for the Israeli war crimes, but conveniently forgetting Trump. And also because it was a pro Trump thing, now when Biden stepped down for reelection (shouldn't change anything, right? A warcrime or genocide is still there) they all vanished...

[–] Yggnar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's equally possible you're just assuming everyone who doesn't share your opinion is a paid troll. I got called a Russian troll multiple times for saying Biden had no business being in this election and that we could do better. Imo it's far more likely you're talking to a child than a "paid troll" if their opinions don't make sense and they dig their heels in. Assuming everything is some grand conspiracy instead of accepting that some people have different beliefs and opinions, or might just be that stupid, simply isn't healthy. Trolls and such exist, sure, but I don't think they are anywhere near as common as you're implying.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] joenforcer@midwest.social 13 points 1 month ago

There's a difference?

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

Maybe trolls. In the article there is a picture of trending phrases, all of which have 1000s of posts except for Trump is a coward, which has less than 500, but I assume they were all made within a short time span so that's how they made the trending list

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Minarble@aussie.zone 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump is a scaredy cat man

[–] Blubber28@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

And very weird too!

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are we sure they aren’t just responding to the hashtag from Twitter? I don’t plan to check but just a thought…

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 21 points 1 month ago

Yeah, it's pretty obviously not what it sounds like. This would be a pretty big headline if the story behind it was true but no other media outlet has reported it except Raw Story, which is considered to have a Strong Left bias. If I were to guess I would say the hashtag is being used to mock progressives now that the Harris campaign is being reported by right-leaning media as having "declined" the Fox debate.

load more comments
view more: next ›