this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
290 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3987 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 175 points 2 months ago (13 children)

If you had told me during the Bush years that there would be a Republican so evil even Dick Cheney wouldn't vote for them I may have jumped off a bridge.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Maybe Cheney got an ethics transplant along with the heart transplant

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah, the GOP are trying to future proof themselves from criticism. They're banking on rose colored glasses being on for pre-Trump republicans.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yup

Everyone sees how romney and liz cheney (and mccain before them) was praised as "the one sane republican" and want to set themselves up to be that when trump finally croaks and they can run "moderate republicans" again.

All these fucks vote more or less in lockstep with trump and the magats outside of MAYBE one or two issues. But they just don't like that they have no power in the party anymore and that trump has repeatedly demonstrated he can't get any down ballot candidates elected.

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

X Doubt.

I'd guess something like he hates that Trump and MAGA in general keep getting cozy with Russia. And they've displaced inner circle NeoCon pals along the way.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

His kid is gay and he's read project 2025.

Note the only time they care is when it affects one of their own or themselves.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

A literal change of heart.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

Nah, they just don't want to be associated with losers

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

like, I would have assumed said evil would be Cheney's padawan or whatever the jr sith is called lol

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

The apprentice?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 50 points 2 months ago (2 children)

WTF? He's still alive? Why am I so cold all of a sudden?

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

They give him a break from patrolling Azkaban every 4 years to vote.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why am I so cold all of a sudden?

Better check if you’ve been shot in the face

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago

If you were shit then you might have to apologize to him.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do it, Donald.

Call Richard Bruce Cheney a RINO.

I need the laugh today.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

You know he'd do it. With a straight face even.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Too little too late Dick. This is the culture war road you set us upon. There are thousands upon thousands dead for your outright lies. Voting against Trump doesn't wash the blood from your hands.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, renowned torture activist

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 14 points 2 months ago

Just one of the many wealthy torture enthusiasts disgusted by the state of the modern republican party that they were 100% responsible for creating.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

The correct answer.

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

This guy wouldn't even vote for his own daughter's best interests. That says alot. Both about his fucked up priorities and the state of the republican party.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This really is the weirdest timeline.

First the bell riots don't happen and now dick Cheney supports a progressive

What the ever loving fuck

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Were clearly in the mirror universe

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At least there's a small chance I'll see warp drive happen within my lifetime either way.

[–] 0000011110110111i@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

I’m scouring the internet for a birth notice of any Zephram Cochrane.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He needs to crawl back into his hole. Who the hell was waiting for Dick Cheney’s endorsement to make a decision?

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I dunno, in almost all circumstances I agree that he should just keep his mouth shut and thankful no one is pursuing him for warcrimes .... But in this instance, he's not going to sway anyone to vote Trump by endorsing Kamala and he might influence some Republicans to cross lines or abstain. Really hard to see this specific act as anything other than a potential good (not altruistic, but still, in balance for the world, neutral to good).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

George W. Bush?

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the alternative is Trump, so it makes sense.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Blows my mind that there is someone capable of making the heartless evil shit stain that is Darth-Cheney, actually vote off party line.

Is this horseshoe theory? Where hippies and the heartless engineer of the Iraq invasion unite to stop the vagina necked swamp terror of monolago?

[–] finley@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

are cyborgs allowed to vote? how does one mail in a ballot from the 3rd ring of hell, anyway?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hey now, my wife is a cyborg.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Fair enough. It’s mostly the remote mail in ballot from hell thing that bothers me anyway.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I doubt they'll be public about it, but I doubt Bush is voting for Trump. I can't for the life of me remember how many other living republican ex presidents there are, but if any are still kicking, I doubt any of them (being old school conservatives) would vote trump.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

W didn't vote for Trump in 2020 and said his dad voted against Trump before he died as well so you're definitely correct. W is now the only living GOP president other than Trump.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Goodness. I wish my 2006 self could see this... he'd think this was The Onion

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

endorsement of mass destruction

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

If the idea is to help Harris win maybe they should keep this endorsement on the DL.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Does... Does this mean Harris actually isn't the lesser of two evils? Now I don't know who to vote for.

load more comments
view more: next ›